Fruit fly research may reveal what happens in female brains during courtship and mating

What are the complex processes in the brain involved with choosing a mate, and are these processes different in females versus males? It’s difficult to study such questions in people, but researchers are finding clues in fruit flies that might be relevant to humans and other animals. Three different studies on the topic are being published in the Cell Press journals Neuron (1, 2) and Current Biology.

Work over the past 100 years has largely focused on the overt courtship behaviors that male flies direct toward females. However, the female ultimately decides whether to reject the male or copulate with him. How does the female make this decision? In one Neuron paper, researchers report that they have identified two small groups of neurons in the female brain that function to modulate whether she will mate or not with a male based on his distinct pheromones and courtship song. In this paper, a team led by Dr. Bruce Baker of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Farm Research Campus in Virginia also reports that these neurons are genetically distinct from the previously identified neurons that function to drive the elaborate courtship ritual with which a male woos a female. “An understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying how sensory information elicits appropriate sexual behaviors can be used as a point of comparison for how similar sexual behavior circuits are structured and function in other species,” says Dr. Baker.

In the Current Biology study, Dr. Leslie Vosshall of The Rockefeller University in New York City and her team found that a small group of neurons in the abdominal nerve cord and reproductive tract—called Abdominal-B neurons—is necessary for the female to pause her movement and interact with a courting male. When the neurons are inactivated, the female ignores the male and keeps moving, but when the neurons are activated, the female spontaneously pauses. “Sexual courtship is a duet—the male and female send signals back and forth until they reach the point that copulation proceeds,” says Dr. Jennifer Bussell, the lead author of the study. “Pausing to interact with a male, rather than avoiding him, is a crucial step in any female’s behavior leading to copulation. Tying a group of neurons to this particular response to males will allow us to dissect in detail how female mating circuitry functions.”

In another Neuron paper, researchers studied the effects of a small protein called sex peptide that is transferred along with sperm from males to females and is detected by sensory neurons in the uterus. Sex peptide changes the female’s behavior so that she is reluctant to mate again for about10 days. The investigators traced the neuronal pathway that is modulated when the uterus’s sensory neurons detect sex peptide. “Thanks to our work, we think the sex peptide signal goes to a region of the fly’s brain that is the homolog of the hypothalamus, which has been know for many years to be central in controlling sexual receptivity in vertebrates,” explains co-lead author Dr. Mark Palfreyman of the Research Institute of Molecular Pathology in Vienna, Austria. This region of the brain links the nervous system to the endocrine, or hormonal, system. “Of course, these models will still need to be tested and our work only provides an initial glimpse, but our study opens the possibility that analogous neuroendocrine systems control sexual receptivity from flies to vertebrates,” adds senior author Dr. Barry Dickson, who was also a co-author on the Current Biology paper published by Dr. Vosshall.

(Image caption: This ribbon diagram shows three ankyrin repeats, a common structure found in receptor proteins that sense either cold or hot temperatures. A Duke team has identified three single-point mutations that can invert temperature-sensitivity, turning a cold-sensor into a heat-sensor. All three of these mutations are located in on a single ankyrin repeat. Credit: Grandl Lab, Duke University)

Small Mutation Changes Brain Freeze to Hot Foot

Ice cream lovers and hot tea drinkers with sensitive teeth could one day have a reason to celebrate a new finding from Duke University researchers. The scientists have found a very small change in a single protein that turns a cold-sensitive receptor into one that senses heat.

Understanding sensation and pain at this level could lead to more specific pain relievers that wouldn’t affect the central nervous system, likely producing less severe side effects than existing medications, said Jorg Grandl, Ph.D., an assistant professor of neurobiology in Duke’s School of Medicine who led the research team.

Temperature-induced pain, also called thermal pain, occurs when the body’s sensory neurons come in contact with temperatures above or below a certain threshold, such as plunging a limb into freezing water.

"We want to understand how either hot or cold temperatures can activate the sensors of hot and cold temperatures in the body," Grandl said.

Previous research has identified transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels as being highly sensitive to either cold or hot temperatures. TRP ion channels are porous proteins that play a role in initiating electrical signals by controlling the flow of charged ions across the cell membrane.

It’s still unclear how temperatures make this happen, but the Grandl team’s research reveals that single-letter changes in DNA, called point mutations, are sufficient to make cold-sensitive TRP ion channels become sensitive to hot temperatures instead.

"There is strong interest in understanding temperature-sensitive molecules from a functional perspective because they are promising targets for developing analgesic compounds to treat chronic pain," said Grandl, who is also a member of the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences. "It is something we currently do not treat well. So, one promising strategy is to stop pain where it is initially sensed — at that first molecule that functions as a sensor of pain."

In a study appearing online early May 8 in the journal Neuron, Grandl’s team focused on TRPA1, an ion channel best known as a sensor for pain caused by environmental irritants and pungent chemicals, such as mustard oil, the active compound found in wasabi.

Grandl’s colleagues, postdoctoral fellow Sairam Jabba and research technician Raman Goyal, investigated whether single-point mutations could change cold-activated mouse TRPA1 into heat-activated. They formed this hypothesis because, in some other animals, including Drosophila fruit-flies and rattlesnakes, TRPA1 is naturally heat-activated.

To identify these structures, the team created a library of 12,000 mutant clones of the cold-activated mouse TRPA1 ion channel and randomly inserted one or two point mutations into each clone. After placing single clones into the individual slots of a 384-well plate and heating it from 25 degrees Celsius to 45 C in a matter of seconds, they were able to measure the thermal sensitivity of each mutant protein.

This screening pinpointed seven clones that showed strong activation when exposed to heat. Gene sequencing of these clones revealed 12 mutations that could potentially be responsible for changing the mouse TRPA1 from cold-activated to heat-activated. Out of these 12 mutations, Jabba and Goyal identified three mutations powerful enough to individually make that switch in TRPA1.

The mutations all turned out to be located within a single small domain of the ion channel protein known as ankyrin repeat six, indicating this domain plays a role in determining cold or heat activation. Ankyrin repeats are often responsible for managing protein-to-protein interactions, but their precise function in TRPA1 had not been previously known.

Interestingly, these single-point mutations didn’t change the ion channels’ responses to chemicals, such as mustard oil.

"This was very surprising and it demonstrates that making a single-point mutation produced a profound change in the temperature sensitivity of the protein, but it did not affect the chemical sensitivity," Grandl said. "It shows these mechanisms are to some degree distinct."

Grandl said that taken together, the findings also suggest that the effectiveness of such a small mutation might have been key to a single ancestral ion channel evolving into the wide diversity of temperature-activated ion channels we see today.

Dynorphin Acts as a Neuromodulator to Inhibit Itch in the Dorsal Horn of the Spinal Cord

Menthol and other counterstimuli relieve itch, resulting in an antipruritic state that persists for minutes to hours. However, the neural basis for this effect is unclear, and the underlying neuromodulatory mechanisms are unknown. Previous studies revealed that Bhlhb5−/− mice, which lack a specific population of spinal inhibitory interneurons (B5-I neurons), develop pathological itch. Here we characterize B5-I neurons and show that they belong to a neurochemically distinct subset. We provide cause-and-effect evidence that B5-I neurons inhibit itch and show that dynorphin, which is released from B5-I neurons, is a key neuromodulator of pruritus. Finally, we show that B5-I neurons are innervated by menthol-, capsaicin-, and mustard oil-responsive sensory neurons and are required for the inhibition of itch by menthol. These findings provide a cellular basis for the inhibition of itch by chemical counterstimuli and suggest that kappa opioids may be a broadly effective therapy for pathological itch.

Full Article

(Image caption: Olfactory sensory neurons (green and magenta) located in the olfactory epithelium. Credit: Image courtesy of Limei Ma, Ph.D., Stowers Institute for Medical Research)

Finding the target: how timing is critical in establishing an olfactory wiring map

The human nose expresses nearly 400 odorant receptors, which allow us to distinguish a large number of scents. In mice the number of odor receptors is closer to 1000. Each olfactory neuron displays only a single type of receptor and all neurons with the same receptors are connected to the same spot, a glomerulus, in the brain. This convergence, or wiring pattern, is often described as an olfactory map. The map is important because it serves as a code book for odorants that allows the brain to distinguish between food odors and the scent of a predator, among others.

Unlike photoreceptors in the retina or hair cells in the inner ear, which cannot be replaced once damaged, olfactory neurons have the unique capacity to regenerate throughout the life. More remarkably, the regenerated neurons must dispatch their axons on a path through the nasal epithelium to the brain through a distance a thousand times the length of the cell, where they make the proper connections. If regenerating neurons are mis-wired to different glomeruli, odor perception would be altered.

In the April 11, 2014 issue of Science, Associate Investigator C. Ron Yu, Ph.D. and colleagues at the Stowers Institute of Medical Research identify a developmental window during which olfactory neurons of newborn mice can form a proper wiring map. They show that if incorrect neuronal connections are maintained after this period, renewing cells will also be mis-wired.

Their results also hint at how the olfactory neurons connect to their targets. Although scientists can induce stem cells to become neurons, they know little about how to precisely steer them to make the proper connections. This work suggests additional targeting skills that stem cell-generated neurons need to acquire to repair the brain or spinal cord.

Previously, researchers thought that since olfactory neurons exhibited lifelong regeneration, they likewise retained the ability to re-establish correct connections. “We show that this is not the case,” says Yu. In the report, his team uses a number of transgenic mouse lines to demonstrate that the first week after birth is a critical window of time during which incorrect projections can be restored to normal. “If mis-targeting does not get corrected within this period, cells still regenerate but many get locked onto the wrong tracks.” Yu adds.

Neuronal wiring has intrigued Yu since he was a post-doc in the lab of Richard Axel, M.D., at Columbia University. Back then Yu created a genetically engineered mouse in which he could temporarily muffle the firing of olfactory neurons. He found that inactivating neurons caused them to connect to the wrong glomeruli. After joining the Stowers Institute in 2005, Yu began to wonder whether an incorrectly wired olfactory map could be restored in mice.

In this new work, Yu’s team, led by first author Limei Ma, Ph.D., reports that if the silenced sensory neurons are reactivated within a week of a mouse’s birth, erroneous olfactory neuron connections are restored. Beyond that critical period, however, neurons appeared to lose the capacity to make the right connections and in fact maintained connections to the wrong glomeruli.

“After the first week, we believe that newly generated neurons follow pre-existing tracks to their target,” says Ma, Senior Research Specialist in the Yu lab. A key finding in the report supports this idea. The team provoked a temporary identity crisis in olfactory neurons by broadly mis-expressing an odorant receptor called M71 in cells where it would not normally be displayed. Surprisingly, only the neurons that normally express the M71 receptor targeted the “wrong” glomeruli, not the neurons that express different odorant receptors. 

An interpretation of this experiment is that late-born olfactory neurons expressing a particular receptor recognize and follow a track laid down earlier by neurons expressing the very same receptor—even if the latter expressed that receptor due to experimental manipulation. “These olfactory neurons have identity tags,” says Ma, referring to the receptors. “And they like to follow others displaying the same tag.”

As yet, investigators have not identified the molecular basis for the targeting switch occurring at the end of one-week period. “We don’t know what keeps these late stage cells from re-establishing the right connections,” explains Ma. “Either the cues that guide them disappear or their axons encounter a physical barrier to the target.”

Yu envisions the studies in the olfactory system will provide clues on how a regenerated neuron, either through a natural process in the case of the olfactory neuron, or by stem technology, find their target and make the right connection. “To repair a damaged spinal cord, you will need to ensure that newly generated motor neurons target the right muscle,” says Yu. “The next goal is to identify the molecular cues that enable correct projections to be established.”

(Image caption: A window of plasticity. Native neurons (green) that express the odorant receptor MOR28 attach to known glomeruli (above). Neurons expressing engineered MOR28 (red) may attach to other glomeruli. Growing side-by-side, the red neurons could redirect some of the green, but only in the perinatal period. Neuron wiring established early remained stable in adults. Credit: Barnea lab/Brown University)

Early neural wiring for smell persists

A new study in Science reveals that the fundamental wiring of the olfactory system in mice sets up shortly after birth and then remains stable but adaptable. The research highlights how important early development can be throughout life and provides insights that may be important in devising regenerative medical therapies in the nervous system.

To accommodate a lifetime of scents and aromas, mammals have hundreds of genes that each produce a different odorant receptor. The complex and diverse olfactory system they build remains adaptable, but a new study in the journal Science shows that the system’s flexibility, or plasticity, has its limits. Working in mice, Brown University scientists found that the fundamental neural wiring map between the nose and the brain becomes established in a critical period of early development and then regenerates the same map thereafter.

The findings not only reveal a key moment with lifelong consequences in the development of a vital sensory system, but also may provide a “heads up” for bioengineers and doctors looking to develop regenerative therapies for the central nervous system. As flexible as the brain is, it also has mechanisms — at least in the olfactory system — to ensure that the connections established early will be maintained for life.

“Our experiments enabled us to reveal that the system has some ‘memory’,” said Gilad Barnea, the Robert and Nancy Carney Assistant Professor of Neuroscience and corresponding author of the study.

Tracking connections

Lead author Lulu Tsai, now a postdoctoral fellow at Drexel University, conducted the experiments under Barnea’s supervision while she was a graduate student at Brown. Tsai and Barnea are the paper’s only authors.

“Lulu really sweated for this,” Barnea said. “These experiments were very complicated.”

Tsai and Barnea sought to track the development of sensory neurons that express an odorant receptor, MOR28, through space and time in the mouse olfactory system. They did so by engineering a version of the receptor that could be expressed or suppressed at key developmental times. Neurons that express the engineered version of MOR28 would glow red under the microscope. In addition, the researchers tweaked the native version of the receptor gene such that neurons that express it would glow green.

In a typical mammalian olfactory system, neurons expressing a receptor gene like MOR28 will be found randomly sprinkled around the lining of the nose, but their long, wiry axons will all connect to just two symmetrical pairs of structures called glomeruli within the brain’s olfactory bulb. The glomeruli relay odor signals to the rest of the brain.

Barnea and Tsai’s mice developed similarly, with most native MOR28-expressing neurons connecting their axons into the typical glomeruli during early development. But when the researchers let the engineered MOR28 become expressed, those connected into other nearby glomeruli. Significantly, native MOR28 axons sometimes ended up becoming rerouted to these alternate glomeruli with their engineered brethren. Under the microscope, green mixed with red.

It’s a novel finding that some engineered MOR28-expressing neurons could reroute native MOR28-expressing neurons to join them outside the standard four MOR28 glomeruli. It suggests that olfactory neurons influence each other during early development as they find their way to glomeruli and don’t, as current neurodevelopmental models suggest, do so autonomously.

Timing is everything

But the main finding of a critical period where wiring becomes locked in came about as Tsai controlled the timing of engineered MOR28 receptor expression. She induced that on the day some mice were born, a week later in other mice, and two weeks later in still others. In mice where engineered MOR28 expression was allowed at birth, one in nine mice showed rerouting of native MOR28 axons to glomeruli with engineered MOR28. A week out only one in 17 mice showed any rerouting. After two weeks it never happened.

“We conclude that there is a critical period for the formation of rerouted-MOR28 glomeruli that ends at birth or shortly thereafter,” Tsai and Barnea wrote in Science.

The researchers also looked at this in other ways. In one experiment, they found that they didn’t need to maintain expression of the engineered MOR28 for the rerouted connections to persist into adulthood. Once established, they remained.

They also tested whether the rerouting seen in developing mice could occur in adults. They let native MOR28-expressing axons grow alone, and then wiped them out. Then they let native and engineered MOR28-expressing neurons regrow fresh connections to the olfactory bulb together when the mice were adults. They never saw rerouting in the adult mice as connections regrew, suggesting that the ability to reroute is lost in adulthood.

In yet another experiment, they found that if they let rerouted glomeruli become established and then wiped out olfactory neurons, the regrowing connections would return to the rerouted glomeruli even when the engineered receptor was no longer expressed. So although adults can’t create new rerouted glomeruli, they will restore existing ones.

All of the experiments together showed that the fundamental wiring diagram of the olfactory system is laid out and implemented early in life. Whatever pattern is established then stays there for life.

These observations suggest that the course of early development has lifelong consequences, Barnea said, providing insight into understanding of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.

These observations may also have implications for regenerative medicine, Barnea said. Once neural circuits are established, it may be difficult to induce subsequent fundamental alterations to them. On the other hand, learning more about the differences between early development and the adult system may help to devise better regenerative strategies.

“It is clear that there is much more for us to learn about the development of neural circuits,” he said.

Insulin plays a role in mediating worms’ perceptions and behaviors

Using salt-sniffing roundworms, Salk scientists help explain how the nervous system processes sensory information

In the past few years, as imaging tools and techniques have improved, scientists have been working tirelessly to build a detailed map of neural connections in the human brain—with the ultimate hope of understanding how the mind works.

But determining how cells in the brain are physically connected is only the first clue for decoding our perceptions and behaviors. We also need to know the precise routes that information takes in the brain in a given context. Now, publishing their results September 8, 2013, in the journal Nature Neuroscience, researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies have shown a striking example of the flexibility in neural circuitry and its influence on behaviors in worms, depending on the animals’ environment.

The roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans has exactly 302 neurons—far less than the estimated 100 billion neurons a person has—and we already know how each of them is connected. That, in addition to how easily the tiny creature’s cells can be manipulated, allows researchers to ask what sort of information passes through the circuits—in molecular-and circuit-level detail—and what are the behavioral consequences of this information flow.

Even with a comprehensive map of the worm’s neuronal connections in hand, however, scientists still don’t know how the animal can interact with its environment in thousands of different ways. That’s one big question that Sreekanth Chalasani, an assistant professor in Salk’s Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory and Sarah Leinwand, a doctoral student at the University of California, San Diego, sought to answer.

In C. elegans, thanks to studies performed more than 20 years ago, many sensory neurons were identified to have distinct roles such as sensing temperature, pheromones, salt and odors. To know what these cells did, scientists had zapped them one-by-one with a laser and measured the worms’ behaviors. These studies implicated one neuron in the detection of increased salt in the worm’s surroundings.

In the new study, rather than ablating individual sensory neurons, Leinwand and Chalasani imaged worms that expressed genetically encoded calcium indicators in their neurons, which caused the cells to light up when active. Surprisingly, after exposure to an attractive but high concentration of salt, the worms’ olfactory sensory neuron lit up.

"We were extremely surprised to see that with these new tools, these new calcium sensors, we could discover that there was more than one type of neuron involved in processing sensory cues that people had thought were only sensed by single neurons," says Leinwand.

Using additional genetic manipulations and behavioral assays, the researchers showed that the olfactory neuron—while still important for sensing odorants—was crucial for the worm’s movement toward salt within a certain concentration range. Unexpectedly, this neuron’s response to salt also required the previously identified salt-sensing neuron. In fact, the olfactory neuron was not directly sensing salt but instead was being activated by the salt sensory neuron, they found.

What information was the salt-sensing neuron sending to the olfactory neuron? Neurons communicate with each other by sending chemical and electrical signals through close contacts with their neighbors. By testing worms whose signaling molecules had been genetically knocked out, Chalasani and Leinwand could see which were playing a role in transmission when the worm was stimulated by higher salt. From these experiments, they saw that a neuropeptide, a small protein present in neurons, was being released by the salt-sensing neuron to shape the animal’s behavior.

Identifying the neuropeptide (or neuropeptides) responsible for the context-dependent signaling was the most challenging part of the study, because the worm has 115 genes that code for some 250 neuropeptides, Chalasani says. Luckily, there are only four different molecular machines that process all of these peptides; by using genetic knockouts of each of the four, Leinwand and Chalasani were quickly able to narrow the list down to about 40 genes which coded for insulin neuropeptides.

One by one, the team tracked olfactory neuron responses to high salt in worms missing each gene, finding that worms lacking the gene for an insulin neuropeptide known as INS-6 did not respond to increases in salt. Putting this peptide back restored the animal’s normal responses to high salt.

"It was rewarding to see that, while there might be more than one peptide signal, the contributions from INS-6 are certainly significant," Leinwand says. She and Chalasani also found the specific receptor on the receiving end of the olfactory neurons.

That insulin was the main signaling molecule recruiting the olfactory neuron into a salt-sensing circuit was a big surprise.

"Traditionally, neuropeptides have been thought to modulate neuronal function over many seconds to many minutes," Chalasani says. "But in this particular instance, it looks like the insulin is acting in less than a second to transfer information from the salt-sensing neuron to the neuron which normally responds to odor."

Similar neuropeptide communication may also create flexible neural circuits that mediate the diverse behaviors that other animals and people perform in their environments. Insulin has many roles in people—it has been implicated in aging and metabolism, for example—but so far it has only been shown to function on a slower, minute time-scale.

Chalasani and Leinwand plan to investigate whether there are other fast neural circuit switches in worms—and if so, whether those switches act through neuropeptide signaling or some other mechanism. They’re also interested in how the circuit switch changes as the animal ages. “You would expect that as the animal is aging, some of this communication becomes less efficient,” Chalasani says.

Hope for Spinal Cord Injuries

Laura Wong has coaxed damaged nerve cells to grow and send messages to the brain again

“An ailment not to be treated,” read the prescription for a spinal cord injury on an Egyptian papyrus in 1,700 B.C. Not much has changed in the intervening millennia. Despite decades of research, modern medicine has made little headway in its quest to reverse damage to the central nervous system.

That is not to say, however, that there isn’t a glimmer of hope. Laura Wong, an M.D./Ph.D. student in Professor Eric Frank’s molecular physiology lab at the Sackler School, has been able to coax damaged nerve cells known as sensory neurons to regenerate, growing as much as 10 times longer than previously documented. What’s more, the new neurons make organized connections with their counterparts inside the spinal cord and brain stem, ensuring information from the outside world paints an accurate picture inside the brain.

“All the regeneration in the world isn’t going to make any difference if they don’t reconnect. You’re still not going to get any function,” says Wong, who has worked since 2010 in Frank’s lab, which is trying to develop therapies for spinal cord injuries.

Her findings, which she presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in 2011 and 2012, shed light on the complex processes behind nerve cell growth and regeneration. If those results can be replicated in patients, it could prevent certain types of nerve damage and improve quality of life for some.

Going the Distance

Unlike tissues such as skin and bone, the cells of the central nervous system in an adult are notoriously resistant to healing. Not only does the supply of natural growth stimulants decline as we age, but the body also produces chemicals that discourage nerve cells from regenerating. Worse, the scar tissue that starts to form immediately after a spinal cord injury also contains compounds that hinder nerve cell growth.

Researchers in Frank’s lab have been seeking ways to either stimulate growth or block the mechanisms that inhibit nerve cell growth—or both—since 2005. Wong’s predecessor in the lab, Pamela Harvey, a 2009 graduate of the Sackler School, tested a synthetic version of a nerve cell growth factor, called artemin, on crushed sensory neurons that relay information from the hands, arms and shoulders to the brain.

The damage mimics a common injury called Erb’s palsy, which can occur when a baby’s shoulder gets caught behind the mother’s pelvis during labor and delivery, creating undue strain on nerves in the newborn’s neck. Riders thrown head first off a motorcycle or snowmobile can suffer similar injuries.

“Anytime the shoulder goes one way and the head and neck go the other, that’s when you see these injuries,” Wong says.

In earlier experiments, Harvey and Frank found that treating with artemin did indeed stimulate the sensory nerve fibers to regenerate and grow back into the spinal cord over the course of about six weeks. In her follow-up experiments, Wong showed that artemin could induce those nerve fibers to grow the 3- to 4-centimeter distance from there up to the brainstem, where the brain and the spinal cord meet. That’s a little more than an inch—or roughly 10 times longer than any other researchers have been able to demonstrate with artemin or any other growth factor.

“A lot of other researchers just haven’t seen this length,” notes Wong, who saw the artemin-induced growth occur over a period of three to six months.

That’s important, because while axons only have to grow across microscopic distances in a developing embryo, they would have to bridge much wider gaps—depending on the site of the injury—to heal a neural injury in an adult, Wong says. Nerves that extend from the spine to the foot or toe can reach lengths of about 60 centimeters, she adds.

But Wong’s artemin-treated nerve fibers achieved more than unprecedented growth. They also reestablished connections with correct regions in the brain stem, just as Harvey had seen the nerve cells do in the spinal cord. That is, the axons essentially plugged themselves back in just as they were prior to the injury, and, like an old-fashioned telephone switchboard, they sent the right messages to the right parts of the brain.

That’s crucial because should the sensory nerves that relay pain signals become crossed, for example, it could result in a patient feeling phantom pain or the sensation of pain from something that shouldn’t cause discomfort at all.

“With some other growth-promoting compounds you get regeneration, but you see those axons growing kind of willy-nilly,” says Wong. “You can see where it would be just as detrimental to have things wired incorrectly as it would be to have things not wired at all.”

Just a Start

Artemin isn’t a panacea for spinal cord injuries, Wong and Frank stress. To work its cellular magic, the compound must be administered within a day or two, and the sooner the better. Also, artemin promotes growth only in sensory neurons—and so far, only in rats—which means such growth wouldn’t improve motor function for someone who had been paralyzed by a spinal cord injury, for example.

But if the findings, which Wong presented at the Society for Neuroscience meetings in 2011 and 2012, prove applicable to humans, restoring sensation alone could still improve quality of life, even for those living with paralysis. Giving these people the ability to sense heat, cold and pain could help them avoid other accidental injuries, says Frank.

Wong hopes her work with sensory neurons will help unlock the secrets to promoting regeneration of other, more obstinate types of neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. While she demonstrated that the sensory nerves plugged themselves back into the spinal cord precisely where they should have, it’s not clear how they did that.

Frank speculates that chemical cues guided the cells back into place. Should researchers be able to identify those cues, they potentially could use that knowledge to spark regeneration of other classes of neurons, such as motor neurons.

“There is hope—not proof—that even in humans these guidance molecules will persist into adulthood,” says Frank. “That means if we are able to get neurons to regenerate in patients, we might be able to make them go back to the right place. These experiments suggest we have some reason to believe it may work.”

These scientists are ‘itching’ to help you stop scratching