Posts tagged sensory neurons
Articles and news from the latest research reports.
With their whiskers rats can detect the texture of objects in the same way as humans do using their fingertips. A study, in which some scientists of SISSA have taken part, shows that it is possible to understand what specific object has been touched by a rat by observing the activation of brain neurons. A further step towards understanding how the brain, also in humans, represents the outside world.
We know the world through the sensory representations within our brain. Such “reconstruction” is performed through the electrical activation of neural cells, the code that contains the information that is constantly processed by the brain. If we wish to understand what are the rules followed by the representation of the world inside the brain we have to comprehend how electrical activation is linked to the sensory experience. For this reason, a team of researchers including Mathew Diamond, Houman Safaai and Moritz von Heimendahl of the International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA) of Trieste have analyzed the behavior and the activation of neural networks in rats while they were carrying out tactile object recognition tests.
During the experiments researchers observed the performance of rats – the animals were discriminating one texture from another – along with the activation of a group of sensory neurons. “For the first time the study has monitored the activity of multiple neurons, while until now, due to technical limitations, researchers had examined only individual neurons,” explains Diamond, who heads up the Tactile Perception and Learning Lab at SISSA. “The activity of such groups of neurons is represented in our model as multi-dimensional clouds, comprising as many dimensions as the number of cells under examination (up to ten). We have observed a different cloud for the contact with each different texture.”
By analyzing the “clouds”, Diamond and his colleagues were able to successfully decode the object contacted by the rodent. “Our method is so accurate that when the rat would mistake one object for another, the decoding would also indicate a different object from the one actually touched. And this happened because the representation made by the brain – and, as a consequence, our decoding – appeared like that of a different object. Hence the error.”
Diamond’s team has no intention of stopping here. “In real life, we generally recognize objects using more senses all together, in an integrated manner. We use touch and sight at the same time, for instance,” explains Diamond. “For this reason we are now working on new experiments employing more neurons, with more complicated stimuli, and more senses, to build ‘multimodal’ representations of objects.”
More in detail…
This kind of “mind reading” carried out on rats’ brain by Diamond and his colleagues is important to understand how the brain forms a representation of the world. “Each one of us perceives a physical world outside ourselves, yet actually all we have at our disposal to create an experience of the world is the representation that our brain makes of it through the input of sensory organs” says Diamond.
To understand that such a representation is at the very least partial it is enough to think of all the information about the world that escapes us all the time: for instance, we are blind to infrared and ultraviolet rays, we are unable to hear certain sound frequencies or smell some chemical substances or others. Some details pertaining to the physical world are completely invisible or, to put it better, imperceptible (others are interpreted incorrectly, like visual illusions, for example.)
This is a further demonstration that what we perceive is not the physical world in itself, but the neuronal activation the world evokes inside our brain.
Getting a grip on hand function: Discovering key spinal cord circuits
Professor and neurosurgeon Dr. Rob Brownstone and postdoctoral fellow Dr. Tuan Bui have identified the spinal cord circuit that controls the hands’ ability to grasp.
The world’s leading neuroscience journal, Neuron, published the breakthrough finding in its latest issue.
The researchers have found that a certain population of neurons in the spinal cord — called the dI3 interneurons — assess information from sensory neurons in the hands and then send the appropriate signals to motor neurons in the spinal cord, and hence to the muscles, to control the hands’ grip.
Importance of hand-grip control
“This circuit allows us to subtly and unconsciously adjust our grasp so we apply the right amount of force to whatever we’re holding,” says Dr. Brownstone, a professor in the Department of Medical Neurosciences and the Division of Neurosurgery. “This mechanism is disrupted in spinal cord injuries, which can completely eliminate the ability to grasp, and in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease, which can lead to an uncontrollable reflexive grasp such that people grab and can’t let go of what they touch.”
Impaired hand function has a devastating effect on people’s independence and ability to function in daily life. As Dr. Brownstone points out, people with quadriplegia ranked hand function as their number-one priority, when asked in a 2004 survey which function they would most want to recover if they could. They rated hand function well above trunk stability, walking, sexual function, bladder and bowel control, and normal sensation.
An unexpected finding
Drs. Brownstone and Bui were testing a spinal cord circuit for its role in the rhythmic pattern of walking, when they found it controlled hand grip instead. “The mice with this circuit disrupted were walking just fine, but I found it was unusually easy to remove them from their cages,” recounts Dr. Bui. “Mice will usually grab onto the cage wires when you go take them out, so this really got us thinking.”
While Dr. Bui was pondering the meaning of this unexpected observation in the lab, Dr. Brownstone was in his neurosurgery clinic, assessing a patient who was unable to control her grasp. “When she took my hand, she was unable to let go,” he recalls. “I had to peel her fingers off one by one to release my hand.”
As they compared notes, Drs. Brownstone and Dr. Bui quickly realized they had come across the circuit that controls hand grasp. Struck by the implications of their observations, they embarked on a series of experiments — with collaborators, including Dr. Tom Jessell at Columbia University in New York City — which validated the finding.
A path to future treatments
Now that the researchers have identified the specific spinal cord circuit that controls hand grip, they can go on to find targets for potential treatments for impaired hand function. “It’s possible that a neurotransmitter or other agent could be delivered to the spinal cord to correct the faulty circuit,” notes Dr. Brownstone. “It could be a complex strategy, but understanding is always the first step.”
Dr. Brownstone is a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in spinal cord circuits. His research is also supported through grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr. Bui is a key member of Dr. Brownstone’s research team in the Motor Control Lab at Dalhousie University, where they are identifying the neural circuits that control our ability to walk and move in coordinated ways. Their ultimate goal is to identify targets for therapies to restore lost motor function and control in people with spinal cord injuries and other neurological diseases.
Stopping cold: USC scientists turn off the ability to feel cold
USC neuroscientists have isolated chills at a cellular level, identifying the sensory network of neurons in the skin that relays the sensation of cold.
David McKemy, associate professor of neurobiology in the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, and his team managed to selectively shut off the ability to sense cold in mice while still leaving them able to sense heat and touch.
In prior work, McKemy discovered a link between the experience of cold and a protein known as TRPM8 (pronounced trip-em-ate), which a sensor of cold temperatures in neurons in the skin, as well as a receptor for menthol, the cooling component of mint. Now, in a paper appearing in the Journal of Neuroscience on February 13, McKemy and his co-investigators have isolated and ablated the neurons that express TRPM8, giving them the ability to test the function of these cells specifically.
Using mouse-tracking software program developed by one of McKemy’s students, the researchers tested control mice and mice without TRPM8 neurons on a multi-temperature surface. The surface temperature ranged from 0 degrees to 50 degrees Celsius (32 to 122 degrees Farenheit), and mice were allowed to move freely among the regions.
The researchers found that mice depleted of TRPM8 neurons could not feel cold, but still responded to heat. Control mice tended to stick to an area around 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) and avoided both colder and hotter areas. But mice without TRPM8 neurons avoided only hotter plates and not cold — even when the cold should have been painful or was potentially dangerous.
In tests of grip strength, responses to touch, or coordinated movements, such as balancing onto a rod while it rotated, there was no difference between the control mice and the mice without TRPM8-expressing neurons.
By better understanding the specific ways in which we feel sensations, scientists hope to one day develop better pain treatments without knocking out all ability to feel for suffering patients.
"The problem with pain drugs now is that they typically just reduce inflammation, which is just one potential cause of pain, or they knock out all sensation, which often is not desirable," McKemy said. "One of our goals is to pave the way for medications that address the pain directly, in a way that does not leave patients completely numb."
The skin is a human being’s largest sensory organ, helping to distinguish between a pleasant contact, like a caress, and a negative sensation, like a pinch or a burn. Previous studies have shown that these sensations are carried to the brain by different types of sensory neurons that have nerve endings in the skin. Only a few of those neuron types have been identified, however, and most of those detect painful stimuli. Now biologists at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) have identified in mice a specific class of skin sensory neurons that reacts to an apparently pleasurable stimulus.
More specifically, the team, led by David J. Anderson, Seymour Benzer Professor of Biology at Caltech, was able to pinpoint individual neurons that were activated by massage-like stroking of the skin. The team’s results are outlined in the January 31 issue of the journal Nature.
Whether in society or nature, decisions are often the result of complex interactions between many factors. Because of this it is usually difficult to determine how much weight the different factors have in making a final decision. Neuroscientists face a similar problem since decisions made by the brain always involve many neurons. Working in collaboration, the University of Tübingen and the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, supported within the framework of the Bernstein Network, researchers lead by CIN professor Matthias Bethge have now shown how the weight of individual neurons in the decision-making process can be reconstructed despite interdependencies between the neurons.
When we see a person on the other side of the street who looks like an old friend, the informational input enters the brain via many sensory neurons. But which of these neurons are crucial in passing on the relevant information to higher brain areas, which will decide who the person is and whether to wave and say ‘hello’? A research group lead by Matthias Bethge has now developed an equation that allows them to calculate to what degree a given individual sensory neuron is involved in the decision process.
To approach this question, researchers have so far considered the information about the final decision that an individual sensory neuron carries. Just as an individual is considered suspicious if he or she is found to have insider information about a crime, those sensory neurons whose activity contains information about the eventual decision are presumed to have played a role in reaching the final decision. The problem with this approach is that neurons – much like people – are constantly communicating with each other. A neuron which itself is not involved in the decision may simply have received this information from a neighboring neuron and “joined in” the conversation. Actually, the neighboring cell sends out the crucial signal transmitted to the higher decision areas in the brain.
The new formula that has been developed by scientists addresses this by accounting not just for the information in the activity of any one neuron but also for the communication that takes place between them. This formula will now be used to determine whether only a few neurons that carry a lot of information are involved in the brain’s decision process, or whether the information contained in very many neurons gets combined. In particular, it will be possible to address the more fundamental question: In which decisions does the brain use information in an optimal way, and for which decisions is its processing suboptimal?
Sensory Neurons Identified as Critical to Sense of Touch
While studying the sense of touch, scientists at Duke Medicine have pinpointed specific neurons that appear to regulate perception. The sensory neurons are characterized by thin spikes, and based on their volume, these protrusions determine the cells’ sensitivity to force.
The findings in fruit fly larvae, which appear in online Oct. 25, 2012, in the journal Current Biology, demonstrate the first known function for the sensory neurons and provide insights that could broaden the understanding of chronic pain syndromes in humans.
"On a molecular level, touch is the most poorly understood of the senses," said W. Daniel Tracey, PhD, associate professor of anesthesiology at Duke University Medical Center and study author. "While there are many types of touch sensor neurons, we still don’t know how these neurons respond to force."