Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

Posts tagged rhodopsin

120 notes

Researchers Design Variant of Main Painkiller Receptor 
Opioids, such as morphine, are still the most effective class of painkillers, but they come with unwanted side effects and can also be addictive and deadly at high doses. Designing new pain-killing drugs of this type involves testing them on their corresponding receptors, but access to meaningful quantities of these receptors that can work in experimental conditions has always been a limiting factor. 
Now, an interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers at the University of Pennsylvania has developed a variant of the mu opioid receptor that has several advantages when it comes to experimentation. This variant can be grown in large quantities in bacteria and is also water-soluble, enabling experiments and applications that had previously been very challenging or impossible.  
The study was led by Renyu Liu, an assistant professor in the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine, and Jeffery Saven, an associate professor in the Department of Chemistry in the School of Arts and Sciences. Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar, then a graduate student in the Department of Chemistry, and Jin Xi, Felipe Matsunaga and Xu Cui, lab members in the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, along with Bernard Selling of Impact Biologicals Inc., contributed significantly to this study.
Their research was published in the Journal PLOS ONE.
The mu opioid receptor belongs to a class of cellular membrane proteins called G protein-coupled receptors, or GPCRs. Involved in wide range of biological processes, these receptors bind to molecules in the environment, initiating cellular signaling pathways. In the case of this receptor, binding to opioid molecules leads to a profound reduction of pain but also to a variety of unpleasant and potentially fatal side-effects, a problem that researchers from multiple disciplines are attempting to address.
“There are two directions for solving this problem in basic science, either working on the opioid molecule or working on the receptor,” Liu said. “We’re doing the latter.”
Experimenting on the mu opioid receptor has been challenging for several reasons. The human receptor itself is relatively scarce, appearing in small quantities on only a few types of cells, making harvesting appreciable amounts impractical. Researchers have also been unable to grow it recombinantly — genetically engineering bacteria to express the protein en masse — as some parts of the protein are toxic to E.coli. Hydrophobic, or water-hating, amino acid groups on the exterior of the receptor that help it sit in the cell’s membrane also make it insoluble in water when isolated.
The researchers set out to address these challenges by computationally designing variants of the mu opioid receptor. This task had challenges of its own; their research was conducted long before the crystal structure of receptor was known.         
“The problem with this receptor is that the native structure has only very recently been solved and only a significant re-engineered mouse model at that,” Liu said. “When we started this project, we were blind.”
Starting with only the gene sequence for the human version of the receptor, the researchers knew the order of the protein’s amino acids but not how they were folded together. The structures for other GPCRs, such as rhodopsin and the beta-2 adrenergic receptor, were known at the time, however.
“Based on the comparison of our sequence to the sequences of those GPCRs, we built a computer model of the protein,” Saven said. “When the structure of the mouse version of this receptor appeared, we were able to compare our model to that structure, and they matched up really well.”
From that comparison, the researchers were able to identify the hydrophobic amino acids on the exterior of the structure, as well as some of those that were potentially toxic to E. coli.
“The objective then was to redesign those exterior amino acids,” Saven said. “Based on the physical and chemical interactions these amino acids have with each other and with water, we were able to identify sequence combinations that are consistent with the model — where atoms don’t overlap in space — and preferentially occupy the exterior surface with ones that are water soluble.”
Replacing 53 of the protein’s 288 amino acids, the research team introduced the new gene sequence into E. coli, which were able to produce large quantities of the variant. Beyond looking like the now-available mouse mu opioid receptor, the researchers were able to show its value to future studies by performing functional tests.  
“We showed that this water-soluble form of the protein can compete with the native, membrane-based form when binding with antagonists that are fluorescently labeled,” Saven said. “You can watch the fluorescence shift as more of these water-soluble variants are floating around in the solution.”   
The team’s computational approach enables further iterations of the variant to be more easily designed, meaning it can be tweaked alongside experimental conditions. 
“This is a great product that can do a lot of things,” Liu said. “You can use this variant to look at the structure-function relationship for the receptor, or even potentially use it as a screening tool.”

Researchers Design Variant of Main Painkiller Receptor

Opioids, such as morphine, are still the most effective class of painkillers, but they come with unwanted side effects and can also be addictive and deadly at high doses. Designing new pain-killing drugs of this type involves testing them on their corresponding receptors, but access to meaningful quantities of these receptors that can work in experimental conditions has always been a limiting factor. 

Now, an interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers at the University of Pennsylvania has developed a variant of the mu opioid receptor that has several advantages when it comes to experimentation. This variant can be grown in large quantities in bacteria and is also water-soluble, enabling experiments and applications that had previously been very challenging or impossible.  

The study was led by Renyu Liu, an assistant professor in the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine, and Jeffery Saven, an associate professor in the Department of Chemistry in the School of Arts and Sciences. Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar, then a graduate student in the Department of Chemistry, and Jin Xi, Felipe Matsunaga and Xu Cui, lab members in the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, along with Bernard Selling of Impact Biologicals Inc., contributed significantly to this study.

Their research was published in the Journal PLOS ONE.

The mu opioid receptor belongs to a class of cellular membrane proteins called G protein-coupled receptors, or GPCRs. Involved in wide range of biological processes, these receptors bind to molecules in the environment, initiating cellular signaling pathways. In the case of this receptor, binding to opioid molecules leads to a profound reduction of pain but also to a variety of unpleasant and potentially fatal side-effects, a problem that researchers from multiple disciplines are attempting to address.

“There are two directions for solving this problem in basic science, either working on the opioid molecule or working on the receptor,” Liu said. “We’re doing the latter.”

Experimenting on the mu opioid receptor has been challenging for several reasons. The human receptor itself is relatively scarce, appearing in small quantities on only a few types of cells, making harvesting appreciable amounts impractical. Researchers have also been unable to grow it recombinantly — genetically engineering bacteria to express the protein en masse — as some parts of the protein are toxic to E.coli. Hydrophobic, or water-hating, amino acid groups on the exterior of the receptor that help it sit in the cell’s membrane also make it insoluble in water when isolated.

The researchers set out to address these challenges by computationally designing variants of the mu opioid receptor. This task had challenges of its own; their research was conducted long before the crystal structure of receptor was known.         

“The problem with this receptor is that the native structure has only very recently been solved and only a significant re-engineered mouse model at that,” Liu said. “When we started this project, we were blind.”

Starting with only the gene sequence for the human version of the receptor, the researchers knew the order of the protein’s amino acids but not how they were folded together. The structures for other GPCRs, such as rhodopsin and the beta-2 adrenergic receptor, were known at the time, however.

“Based on the comparison of our sequence to the sequences of those GPCRs, we built a computer model of the protein,” Saven said. “When the structure of the mouse version of this receptor appeared, we were able to compare our model to that structure, and they matched up really well.”

From that comparison, the researchers were able to identify the hydrophobic amino acids on the exterior of the structure, as well as some of those that were potentially toxic to E. coli.

“The objective then was to redesign those exterior amino acids,” Saven said. “Based on the physical and chemical interactions these amino acids have with each other and with water, we were able to identify sequence combinations that are consistent with the model — where atoms don’t overlap in space — and preferentially occupy the exterior surface with ones that are water soluble.”

Replacing 53 of the protein’s 288 amino acids, the research team introduced the new gene sequence into E. coli, which were able to produce large quantities of the variant. Beyond looking like the now-available mouse mu opioid receptor, the researchers were able to show its value to future studies by performing functional tests.  

“We showed that this water-soluble form of the protein can compete with the native, membrane-based form when binding with antagonists that are fluorescently labeled,” Saven said. “You can watch the fluorescence shift as more of these water-soluble variants are floating around in the solution.”   

The team’s computational approach enables further iterations of the variant to be more easily designed, meaning it can be tweaked alongside experimental conditions. 

“This is a great product that can do a lot of things,” Liu said. “You can use this variant to look at the structure-function relationship for the receptor, or even potentially use it as a screening tool.”

Filed under opioids opioid receptors G protein-coupled receptors E.coli rhodopsin amino acids neuroscience science

164 notes

New understanding of how we see colors

Scientists have until now not fully understood how animals see in color, since visual pigments in eyes contain exactly the same chromophore (light absorbing segment of the molecule) and yet can absorb different wavelengths of light.

image

The chromophore retinal (Vitamin A aldehyde or retinaldehyde) is used by all animals but, depending on the photoreceptor proteins (opsins) associated with it, the same molecule can absorb a spectrum of colors from blues or even ultraviolet to reds. How a single molecule can do this has until now been uncertain.

Now researchers, led by Prof. Babak Borhan of Michigan State University at East Lansing, set out to try to understand the mechanism by which the opsins change the light absorption spectrum of the chromophore retinal. They concentrated their efforts on a pigment found in human retinal photoreceptor cells, rhodopsin, which consists of opsin and chromophore components.

One of the major theories about how retinal works is that because it is strongly positively charged at one end it could distribute this electrostatic charge across the chromophore molecule, and this would enable it to absorb the longer wavelengths at the red end of the spectrum. Another theory held that a change in shape of the chromophore-opsin complex could alter the absorption capabilities.

The problem with testing the theories, Borhan said, is that the visual pigments have proved difficult to work with. So instead, Borhan and colleagues used human cellular retinol binding protein II, (hCRBPII), a gut protein that binds retinol, which is closely related to retinal but which tolerates mutations more readily.

The team first created a mutation of hCRPBII that could bind retinal. They then changed the distribution of the electrostatic charge on the retinal molecule by replacing amino acids at the binding site retinal uses on hCRPBII in various ways, and in so doing created a range of pigment proteins.

The team then used spectrophotometry to compare the light entering and leaving the proteins to determine which wavelengths were being absorbed. Using this approach they were able to prove the charge distribution theory was correct and that no change in shape was necessary.

A by-product of the new research is the production of the 11 new artificial pigments, which could be used in tracking proteins or cell types being studied, as well as other possible applications such as in food dyes. One of the new pigments could absorb a red wavelength of 644 nanometers (nm), which is above the theoretical maximum wavelength retinal can absorb (560 nm) and is close to infrared (750 nm +).

The paper was published in the journal Science.

(Source: medicalxpress.com)

Filed under color vision visual pigments retinal photoreceptor cells rhodopsin neuroscience science

67 notes


Study clarifies process controlling night vision
New research reveals the key chemical process that corrects for potential visual errors in low-light conditions. Understanding this fundamental step could lead to new treatments for visual deficits, or might one day boost normal night vision to new levels.
Like the mirror of a telescope pointed toward the night sky, the eye’s rod cells capture the energy of photons - the individual particles that make up light. The interaction triggers a series of chemical signals that ultimately translate the photons into the light we see.
The key light receptor in rod cells is a protein called rhodopsin. Each rod cell has about 100 million rhodopsin receptors, and each one can detect a single photon at a time.
Scientists had thought that the strength of rhodopsin’s signal determines how well we see in dim light. But UC Davis scientists have found instead that a second step acts as a gatekeeper to correct for rhodopsin errors. The result is a more accurate reading of light under dim conditions.
A report on their research appears in the October issue of the journal Neuron in a study entitled “Calcium feedback to cGMP synthesis strongly attenuates single photon responses driven by long rhodopsin lifetimes.”

Study clarifies process controlling night vision

New research reveals the key chemical process that corrects for potential visual errors in low-light conditions. Understanding this fundamental step could lead to new treatments for visual deficits, or might one day boost normal night vision to new levels.

Like the mirror of a telescope pointed toward the night sky, the eye’s rod cells capture the energy of photons - the individual particles that make up light. The interaction triggers a series of chemical signals that ultimately translate the photons into the light we see.

The key light receptor in rod cells is a protein called rhodopsin. Each rod cell has about 100 million rhodopsin receptors, and each one can detect a single photon at a time.

Scientists had thought that the strength of rhodopsin’s signal determines how well we see in dim light. But UC Davis scientists have found instead that a second step acts as a gatekeeper to correct for rhodopsin errors. The result is a more accurate reading of light under dim conditions.

A report on their research appears in the October issue of the journal Neuron in a study entitled “Calcium feedback to cGMP synthesis strongly attenuates single photon responses driven by long rhodopsin lifetimes.

Filed under vision night vision rhodopsin neuron receptors perception neuroscience psychology science

free counters