Bad learning

University of Iowa researchers have discovered a new form of neurotransmission that influences the long-lasting memory created by addictive drugs, like cocaine and opioids, and the subsequent craving for these drugs of abuse. Loss of this type of neurotransmission creates changes in brains cells that resemble the changes caused by drug addiction.

The findings, published June 22 in the journal Nature Neuroscience, suggest that targeting this type of neurotransmission might lead to new therapies for treating drug addiction.

“Molecular therapies for drug addiction are pretty much non-existent,” says Collin Kreple, UI graduate student and co-first author of the study. “I think this finding at least provides the possibility of a new molecular target.”

The new form of neurotransmission involves proteins called acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), which have previously been shown to promote learning and memory, and which are abundant in a part of the brain that is involved in drug addiction. The researchers, led by John Wemmie, professor of psychiatry in the UI Carver College of Medicine, reasoned that disrupting ASIC activity in this brain region (the nucleus accumbens) should reduce learned addiction-related behaviors. However, their experiments showed that loss of ASIC signaling actually increases learned drug-seeking in mice.

When mice learned to associate one side of a chamber with receiving cocaine, animals that lacked the ASIC protein developed an even stronger preference for the “cocaine side” than control mice, suggesting that loss of ASIC had increased addiction behavior. The same result was seen for morphine, another drug of abuse, which has a different mechanism of action than cocaine.

"Always before, the data suggested that when you get rid of ASICs, learning and memory are impaired," Wemmie says. "So we expected the same trend when we studied reward-related learning and behavior and we were surprised to find the opposite."

In a second experiment, rats learned to press a lever to self-administer cocaine. Blocking or removing ASIC in the rat brains caused the animals to self-administer more cocaine than control animals. Conversely, increasing the amount of ASIC by over-expressing the protein seemed to decrease the animals’ craving for cocaine.

"There are many forms of addiction," says Wemmie, who also holds appointments in the UI Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics and Neurosurgery, and with the Iowa City VA Medical Center. "We’d like to see if these mechanisms also apply to other addictions besides cocaine and morphine. And, we want to move forward to see if this pathway can be used to target addiction."

Novel neurotransmission

As the name suggests, acid-sensing ion channels are activated by acid, in the form of protons. This research and a second UI study recently published in PNAS show that protons and ASICs form a previously unrecognized neurotransmitter pair that helps neurons communicate in a novel way; and appear to influence several forms of learning and memory, including fear, as well as addiction.

Manipulating the activity of ASICs or the level of protons (acidity) may provide a new way to treat addiction.

"We are still a long way from using these findings to create a therapy," notes Yuan Lu, co-first author and UI postdoctoral scholar. "The key significance of this study is that we have found new, different targets [that might allow us to inhibit the addiction behavior].”

Drugs change the brain

Previous research has shown that drug abuse and addiction physically alter the connections between neurons (synapses) that are important for the creation and storage of memories. Although normal learning requires synapses to be dynamic and plastic, exposure to addictive drugs abnormally increases synaptic plasticity in a way that is thought to underlie drug-related learning and addiction behaviors. The UI study found that absence of ASIC-proton mediated neurotransmission also increased synaptic plasticity in a way that resembled the changes created by addiction and drug withdrawal.

"It seemed like everything we looked at (physiology and structural changes) really paralleled what you would see in an animal undergoing drug withdrawal, even though these animals missing ASIC had never been exposed to drugs," Kreple says.

Overall the study findings suggest that ASIC-related neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens may play a role in reducing synaptic plasticity and appropriately stabilizing synapses.

Research shows why ketamine is an effective antidepressant but memantine is not

Ketamine is a fast-acting antidepressant. However, it can create symptoms that mimic psychosis. Therefore, doctors don’t give it to depressed patients. Memantine, a similar drug, does not have psychotomimetic effects, but it also does not appear to alleviate depression. Lisa M. Monteggia of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and her colleagues have determined that these drugs have different effects on neurotransmitter pathways. In particular, ketamine promotes the expression of neurotrophic factors but memantine doesn’t. The research appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Read more

How Cone Snail Venom Minimizes Pain

The venom from marine cone snails, used to immobilize prey, contains numerous peptides called conotoxins, some of which can act as painkillers in mammals. A recent study in The Journal of General Physiology provides new insight into the mechanisms by which one conotoxin, Vc1.1, inhibits pain. The findings help explain the analgesic powers of this naturally occurring toxin and could eventually lead to the development of synthetic forms of Vc1.1 to treat certain types of neuropathic pain in humans.

Neuropathic pain, a form of chronic pain that occurs in conjunction with injury to—or dysfunction of—the nervous system, can be debilitating and difficult to treat, and the medical community is eager to find better methods to minimize what can be a serious condition. Neuropathic pain is associated with changes in the transmission of signals between neurons, a process that depends on several types of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). However, given the importance of these VGCCs in mediating normal neurotransmission, using them as a pharmacological target against neuropathic pain could potentially lead to undesirable side effects.

In previous studies, David Adams and colleagues from RMIT University in Melbourne showed that Vc1.1 acted against neuropathic pain in mice; they found that, rather than acting directly to block VGCCs, Vc1.1 acts through GABA type B (GABA_B) receptors to inhibit N-type (Ca_v2.2) channels.

Now, Adams and colleagues show that Vc1.1 also acts through GABA_B receptors to inhibit a second, mysterious class of neuronal VGCCs that have been implicated in pain signaling but have not been well understood—R-type (Ca_v2.3) channels. Their new findings not only help solve the mystery of Ca_v2.3 function, but identify them as targets for analgesic conotoxins.

Brain Noise Found to Nurture Synapses

A study has shown that a long-overlooked form of neuron-to-neuron communication called miniature neurotransmission plays an essential role in the development of synapses, the regions where nerve impulses are transmitted and received. The findings, made in fruit flies, raise the possibility that abnormalities in miniature neurotransmission may contribute to neurodevelopmental diseases. The findings, by researchers at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), were published today in the online edition of the journal Neuron.

The primary way in which neurons communicate with each another is through “evoked neurotransmission.” This process begins when an electrical signal, or action potential, is transmitted along a long, cable-like extension of the neuron called an axon. Upon reaching the axon’s terminus, the signal triggers the release of chemicals called neurotransmitters across the synapse. Finally, the neurotransmitters bind to and activate receptors of the neuron on the other side of the synapse. Neurotransmitters are packaged together into vesicles, which are released by the hundreds, if not thousands, with each action potential. Evoked neurotransmission was first characterized in the 1950s by Sir Bernard Katz and two other researchers, who were awarded the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their efforts.

“Dr. Katz also found that even without action potentials, lone vesicles are released now and then at the synapse,” said study leader Brian D. McCabe, PhD, assistant professor of pathology and cell biology and of neuroscience in the Motor Neuron Center. “These miniature events — or minis — have been found at every type of synapse that has been studied. However, since minis don’t induce neurons to fire, people assumed they were inconsequential, just background noise.”

Recent cell-culture studies, however, have suggested that minis do have some function and even their own regulatory mechanisms. “This led us to wonder why there would be such complicated mechanisms for regulating something that was just noise,” said Dr. McCabe.

To learn more about minis, the CUMC team devised new genetic tools to selectively up- or down-regulate evoked and miniature neurotransmission in fruit flies (a commonly used model organism for neuronal function and development). This was the first study to identify a unique role for minis in an animal model.

The researchers found that when both types of neurotransmission were blocked, synapse development was abnormal. However, inhibiting or stimulating evoked neurotransmission alone had no effect on synaptic development. “But when we blocked minis, synapses failed to develop,” said Dr. McCabe, “and when we stimulated the release of more minis, synapses got bigger.”

The study also showed that minis regulate synapse development by activating a signaling pathway in neurons involving Trio and Rac1 proteins in presynaptic neurons. These proteins are also found in humans.

It remains to be seen exactly how minis are exerting their effects. “Parallel communication occurs in computer networks,” Dr. McCabe said. “Computers communicate primarily by sending bursts of data bundled into packets. But individual computers also send out pings, or tiny electronic queries, to determine if there is a connection to other computers. Similarly, neurons may be using minis to ping connected neurons, saying in effect, ‘We are connected and I am ready to communicate.’”

The researchers are currently looking into whether minis have a functional role in the mature nervous system. If so, it’s possible that defects in minis could contribute to neurodegenerative disease.

Sensing Gravity with Acid: Scientists Discover a Role for Protons in Neurotransmission

While probing how organisms sense gravity and acceleration, scientists at the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) and the University of Utah uncovered evidence that acid (proton concentration) plays a key role in communication between neurons. The surprising discovery is reported this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The team, led by the late MBL senior scientist Stephen M. Highstein, discovered that sensory cells in the inner ear continuously transmit information on orientation of the head relative to gravity and low-frequency motion to the brain using protons as the key synaptic signaling molecule. (The synapse is the structure that allows one neuron to communicate with another by passing a chemical or electrical signal between them.)

“This addresses how we sense gravity and other low-frequency inertial stimuli, like acceleration of an automobile or roll of an airplane,” says co-author Richard Rabbitt, a professor at University of Utah and adjunct faculty member in the MBL’s Program in Sensory Physiology and Behavior. “These are very long-lasting signals requiring a a synapse that does not fatigue or lose sensitivity over time. Use of protons to acidify the space between cells and transmit information from one cell to another could explain how the inner ear is able to sense tonic signals, such as gravity, in a robust and energy efficient way.”

The team found that this novel mode of neurotransmission between the sensory cells (type 1 vestibular hair cells) and their target afferent neurons (calyx nerve terminals), which send signals to the brain, is continuous or nonquantal. This nonquantal transmission is unusual and, for low-frequency stimuli like gravity, is more energy efficient than traditional synapses in which chemical neurotransmitters are packaged in vesicles and released quantally.

The calyx nerve terminal has a ball-in-socket shape that envelopes the sensory hair cell and helps to capture protons exiting the cell. “The inner-ear vestibular system is the only place where this particular type of synapse is present,” Rabbitt says. “But the fact that protons are playing a key role here suggests they are likely to act as important signaling molecules in other synapses as well.”

Previously, Erik Jorgensen of University of Utah (who recently received a Lillie Research Innovation Award from the MBL and the University of Chicago) and colleagues discovered that protons act as signaling molecules between muscle cells in the worm C. elegans and play an important role in muscle contraction. The present paper is the first to demonstrate that protons also act directly as a nonquantal chemical neurotransmitter in concert with classical neurotransmission mechanisms. The discovery suggests that similar intercellular proton signaling mechanisms might be at play in the central nervous system.

How Our Nerves Keep Firing

University of Utah and German biologists discovered how nerve cells recycle tiny bubbles or “vesicles” that send chemical nerve signals from one cell to the next. The process is much faster and different than two previously proposed mechanisms for recycling the bubbles.

Researchers photographed mouse brain cells using an electron microscope after flash-freezing the cells in the act of firing nerve signals. That showed the tiny vesicles are recycled to form new bubbles only one-tenth of a second after they dump their cargo of neurotransmitters into the gap or “synapse” between two nerve cells or neurons.

“Without recycling these containers or ‘synaptic vesicles’ filled with neurotransmitters, you could move once and stop, think one thought and stop, take one step and stop, and speak one word and stop,” says University of Utah biologist Erik Jorgensen, senior author of the study in the Dec. 4 issue of the journal Nature.

“A fast nervous system allows you to think and move. Recycling synaptic vesicles allows your brain and muscles to keep working longer than a couple of seconds,” says Jorgensen, a distinguished professor of biology. “This process also may protect neurons from neurodegenerative diseases like Lou Gehrig’s disease and Alzheimer’s. So understanding the process may give us insights into treatments someday.”

A brain cell maintains a supply of 300 to 400 vesicles to send chemical nerve signals, using up to several hundred per second to release neurotransmitters, says the study’s first author, postdoctoral fellow Shigeki Watanabe.

Recycling vesicles is called “endocytosis.” Jorgensen and Watanabe named the process they observed “ultrafast endocytosis.” They showed it takes one-tenth of a second for a vesicle to be recycled, and such recycling occurs on the edge of “active zone” – the place on the end of the nerve cell where the vesicles first unload neurotransmitters into the synapse between brain cells.

“It’s like Whac-A-Mole: one vesicle goes down (fuses and unloads) and another pops up someplace else,” Jorgensen says.

Jorgensen believes ultrafast endocytosis is the most common way of recycling vesicles, but says the study doesn’t disprove two other, long-debated hypotheses:

– “Kiss-and-run endocytosis,” which supposedly takes one second, with a vesicle just “kissing” the inside of its nerve cell, dumping its neurotransmitters outside and “running” by detaching to reform a recycled vesicle in the same part of the active zone.

– Clathrin-mediated endocytosis,” which purportedly takes 20 seconds and occurs away from the active zone, at a point where a protein named clathrin assembles itself into a soccer-ball-shaped scaffold that forms a new vesicle or bubble.

Earlier this year, Jorgensen, Watanabe and colleagues published a related study in the journal eLife revealing that ultrafast endocytosis occurs in nematode worms. The new study of hippocampal brain cells from mice “tells us that mammals – and thus humans – do it the same way,” Jorgensen says. “The two papers together identify a process never previously seen – much faster than has been measured before.”

Jorgensen and Watanabe conducted the study with M. Wayne Davis, a University of Utah research assistant professor of biology; and technician Berit Söhl-Kielczynski and neuroscientists Christian Rosenmund, Benjamin Rost and Marcial Camacho-Pérez, all of Germany’s Charity University Medicine Berlin.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the European Research Council and the German Research Council. Jorgensen also is funded by his status as a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and an Alexander von Humboldt Scholar.

Machine Gun Analogy for Vesicle Recycling

The process of a vesicle fusing to the nerve cell’s wall from the inside, then releasing neurotransmitters into the synapse is known as “exocytosis.” An analogy might be a bubble rising from boiling soup and releasing steam. The liquid part of the bubble fuses with the liquid in the soup, sooner or later to arise in another bubble.

The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to three scientists who discovered key aspects of vesicle transport of cargo and exocytosis in nerve and other cells: which genes are required for vesicle transport, how vesicles deliver cargo to the correct locations, and how vesicles in brain cells release neurotransmitters to send a signal to the next brain neuron.

Jorgensen, Shigeki and colleagues studied the next step, endocytosis: how the membrane that forms vesicles (and nerve cell walls) is recycled to form new vesicles.

To illustrate the three possible mechanisms for recycling vesicles, Jorgensen compares vesicles with machine gun shells.

“You are fusing vesicles to the nerve cell membrane and expelling the neurotransmitter contents at extremely high rates,” he says. “The synapse will use up its ‘ammo’ very quickly at these rates, so the cell needs to refill the empty shells.”

Clathrin-mediated vesicle recycling is like “remaking the shell from scratch,” he says, while kiss-and-run endocytosis is like picking up every empty shell casing and refilling them one at a time.

“Ultrafast endocytosis allows the synapse to whip up all of the empty shells by the handful, fill them, and put them back in line at incredibly fast rates so the machine gun never runs out of ammo,” Jorgensen says.

Flash and Freeze for Nerve Cells in Action

Shigeki, Jorgensen and colleagues developed a method to photograph the tiny vesicles inside a nerve cell as the bubbles moved to the end of the cell, fused with the cell membrane, dumped their load of neurotransmitters into the gap or “synapse” between nerve cells, and then were recycled to reappear as new bubbles inside the nerve cell.

“We found a way to look at this process on a timescale that no one ever looked at before,” Watanabe says.

First, the researchers grew hundreds of brain cells from the mouse hippocampus – the often-studied part of the brain required for memory formation – on quarter-inch-wide sapphire disks placed in petri dishes with growth medium.

They added an algae gene to mouse brain cells that made the neurons produce an “ion channel” – basically a switch – that is stimulated by light instead of electricity. Then the brain cells were placed in a super-cold, high-pressure chamber, at 310 degrees below zero Fahrenheit and pressure 2,000 times greater than Earth’s atmosphere at sea level.

A wire cannot be routed into the chamber, which is why the cells were genetically programmed to be stimulated by light. The researchers flashed blue light on the mouse brain cells, making them “fire” neurotransmitter nerve signals. At the same time, the firing neurons were frozen with a blast of liquid nitrogen. To catch neurons in all stages of firing, the nerve cells were frozen at various times after the flash of blue light: 15, 30 and 100 milliseconds and one, three and 10 seconds.

“We built a new device to capture neurons performing fast behaviors,” Jorgensen says. “It stops all motion in the cell – even membranes in the act of fusing.

“We call it flash and freeze,” Watanabe says.

Next, the sapphire disks with neurons were put into liquid epoxy, which hardened and then were thin-sliced so the neurons could be photographed under an electron microscope. The ultrafast formation of recycled vesicles was visible.

“You see the outline of the membrane,” Jorgensen says. “You see the bubbles or vesicles in different stages of formation.”

Watanabe says about 3,000 mouse brain cell synapses were flashed, frozen and analyzed during the study. About 20 percent of the nerve cells had been fired and showed signs that nerve vesicles were being recycled.

Ultrasensitive Calcium Sensors Shine New Light on Neuron Activity

A new protein engineered by scientists at the Janelia Farm Research Campus fluoresces brightly each time it senses calcium, giving the scientists a way to visualize neuronal activity. The new protein is the most sensitive calcium sensor ever developed and the first to allow the detection of every neural impulse.

Every time you say a word, take a step, or read a sentence, a collection of neurons sends a speedy relay of messages throughout your brain to process the information. Now, researchers have a new way of watching those messages in action, by watching each cell in the chain light up when it fires.

When a neuron receives a signal from one of its neighbors, the impulse sets off a sudden series of electrochemical events geared toward passing the message along. Among the first events: calcium ions rush into the neurons when a set of channels opens. Scientists at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Farm Research Campus have engineered a new protein that brightly fluoresces each time it senses these calcium waves, giving the scientists a way to visualize the activity of every neuron throughout the brain. The new protein is the most sensitive calcium sensor ever developed and the first to allow the detection of every neural impulse, rather than just a portion. The results are reported in the July 18, 2013 issue of the journal Nature.

“You can think of the brain as an orchestra with each different neuron type playing a different part,” says Janelia lab head Karel Svoboda, a neurobiologist and member of the team that developed the new sensor. “Previous methods only let us hear a tiny fraction of the melodies. Now we can hear more of the symphony at once. Improving the molecule and imaging methods in the future could allow us to hear the entire symphony.”

Detecting which neurons in the brain are firing, and when, is a key step in learning which areas of the brain are linked to particular activities or disorders, how memories are formed, how behaviors are learned, and basic questions about how the brain organizes neurons and stores information in this organization.

Two decades ago, scientists who wanted to use calcium to pinpoint neural activity relied on synthetic calcium-indicator dyes, first developed by HHMI Investigator Roger Tsien. The dyes lit up when neurons fired, but were difficult to inject and highly toxic—an animal’s brain could only be imaged once using the dyes.

In 1997, researchers led by Tsien developed the first genetically encoded calcium indicator (GECI). GECIs were made by combining a gene for a calcium sensor with the gene for a fluorescent protein in a way that made the calcium sensor fluoresce when it bound calcium. The GECI genes could be integrated into the genomes of model organisms like mice or flies so that no dye injection was necessary. The animals’ own brain cells would produce the proteins throughout their lives, and brain activity could be studied again and again in any one animal, allowing long-term studies of processes like learning and development. But GECIs weren’t as accurate as the cumbersome dyes had been, and improving them was a slow process.

“New versions were developed in a very piecemeal way,” says Svoboda, explaining that after chemists developed the sensors, it might be years before biologists had an opportunity to test them in the brains of living animals. “It was a very slow process of getting feedback.”

Svoboda, along with Janelia lab heads Loren Looger, Vivek Jayaraman and Rex Kerr formed the Genetically Encoded Neural Indicator and Effector (GENIE) project at Janelia to speed up the innovation. The GENIE project, led by Douglas Kim, an HHMI program scientist, is one of several collaborative team projects online at Janelia. The project developed a higher-throughput and more accurate way of testing new variants of the best-working GECI, called GCaMP. Steps included simple tests that could easily be performed on many proteins at once, like measuring how much fluorescence the protein gave off when exposed to calcium in a cuvette, as well as early tests of function in different types of neurons and final experiments in genetically engineered mice, flies, and zebrafish.

“When people developed previous GECIs, they would test somewhere between ten and twenty variants very carefully. We were able to screen a thousand in a highly quantitative neuronal assay,” Looger says. “And when you can look at that many constructs, you’re going to make better and more interesting observations on what makes the ideal sensor.”

The team made successive rounds of tweaks to the structure of the GCaMP so that it accurately sensed calcium, shone brightly in response, and worked in model organisms. After that work they settled upon a version of the sensor that performed better in all aspects than previous GECIs. Their new sensor, dubbed GCaMP6, produced signals seven times stronger than past versions. Surprisingly, its sensitivity even outperformed synthetic dyes.

“People had assumed that the synthetic dyes were letting us see every event in neurons,” says Looger. “But we’ve now shown that not only are these dyes hard to load and quite toxic, but they weren’t even recording every event.”

GCaMP6 will be a boon to researchers at Janelia, and around the world, who want to get a full picture of the activity of every neuron in the brain. Meanwhile, the team plans to continue to continue to improve it, developing entirely new versions for specific uses. For example, they hope to make a GECI that gives off red fluorescence rather than green, because red is easier to see in deeper tissues.

“One of the stated goals of Janelia Farm is to develop an atlas of every neuron in the Drosophila brain,” says Looger. “The most practical way I can think of to assign functions to such an atlas is with calcium sensors. With this new sensor, I think people will feel much more comfortable that they’re really getting all the information they can.”