Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

Posts tagged nerve damage

166 notes

How Neurons Get Wired
Two different versions of the same signaling protein tell a nerve cell which end is which, UA researchers have discovered. The findings could help improve therapies for spinal injuries and neurodegenerative diseases.
University of Arizona scientists have discovered an unknown mechanism that establishes polarity in developing nerve cells. Understanding how nerve cells make connections is an important step in developing cures for nerve damage resulting from spinal cord injuries or neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
In a study published on Aug. 12 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, UA doctoral student Sara Parker and her adviser, assistant professor of cellular and molecular medicine Sourav Ghosh, report that the decision which will be the “plus” and the “minus” end in a newborn nerve cell is made by a long and a short version of the same signaling molecule.
Nerve cells – or neurons – differ from many other cells by their highly asymmetric shape: Vaguely resembling a tree, a neuron has one long, trunk-like extension ending in a tuft of root-like bristles. This is called the axon. From the opposite end of the cell body sprout branch-like structures known as dendrites. By connecting the “branches” of their dendrites to the “root tips” of other neurons’ axons, nerve cells form networks, which can be as simple as the few connections involved in the knee-jerk reflex or as complex as those in the human brain.
Parker and her team found that embryonic nerve cells manufacture a well-known signaling enzyme called Atypical Protein Kinase C (aPKC) in two varieties: a full-length one and a truncated one. Both varieties compete to bind the same molecular partner, a protein called Par3. If the short form of aPKC pairs up with Par3, it tells the cell to grow a dendrite, and if the long one pairs up with Par3, it will make an axon instead.
When the researchers blocked the production of the short form, the nerve cell grew multiple axons and no dendrites. When they created an artificial abundance of the short form, dendrites formed at the expense of axons. UA undergraduate student Sophie Hapak performed many of the experiments revealing how the two isoforms compete for Par3.
"We show that wiring a neuronal circuit is much more complex than previously thought," said Ghosh. "The process has a built-in robustness that explicitly defines which part of the cell is ‘positive’ and which is ‘negative.’"
"In order to have a functioning neuronal circuit, you have to have receiving and sending ends," Parker said. "Initially, when a neuron is formed, it lacks the polarity it needs once it develops into a part of a circuit. The mechanism we discovered establishes that polarity."
"How the various brain regions are wired is the basis of emotion, memory and all cognitive functions," said Ghosh, who is a member of the UA’s BIO5 Institute. "Establishing neuronal polarity in single neurons is absolutely essential for neuronal circuits to form."
"If we understand this mechanism, we could think about methods to spur new axons after the original ones were severed in a traumatic spinal cord injury, for example," Ghosh said.
The findings defy conventional wisdom, which maintains that a developing neuron will make dendrites by default unless instructed by the long form of aPKC to make an axon instead. By cultivating and studying neurons just after they formed, Parker and her group found that both forms of aPKC, long and short, are initially distributed equally throughout the cell. These forms subsequently segregate into different parts of the cell as the neuron matures and establishes polarity.
Because the cells were isolated from rat brains and kept in culture, the researchers could demonstrate that no external clues from other cells are needed to instruct a developing neuron. Whether the establishment of polarity is a random process or whether other signals yet to be identified play a role in regulating the abundance of the two aPKC varieties is not known.

How Neurons Get Wired

Two different versions of the same signaling protein tell a nerve cell which end is which, UA researchers have discovered. The findings could help improve therapies for spinal injuries and neurodegenerative diseases.

University of Arizona scientists have discovered an unknown mechanism that establishes polarity in developing nerve cells. Understanding how nerve cells make connections is an important step in developing cures for nerve damage resulting from spinal cord injuries or neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

In a study published on Aug. 12 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, UA doctoral student Sara Parker and her adviser, assistant professor of cellular and molecular medicine Sourav Ghosh, report that the decision which will be the “plus” and the “minus” end in a newborn nerve cell is made by a long and a short version of the same signaling molecule.

Nerve cells – or neurons – differ from many other cells by their highly asymmetric shape: Vaguely resembling a tree, a neuron has one long, trunk-like extension ending in a tuft of root-like bristles. This is called the axon. From the opposite end of the cell body sprout branch-like structures known as dendrites. By connecting the “branches” of their dendrites to the “root tips” of other neurons’ axons, nerve cells form networks, which can be as simple as the few connections involved in the knee-jerk reflex or as complex as those in the human brain.

Parker and her team found that embryonic nerve cells manufacture a well-known signaling enzyme called Atypical Protein Kinase C (aPKC) in two varieties: a full-length one and a truncated one. Both varieties compete to bind the same molecular partner, a protein called Par3. If the short form of aPKC pairs up with Par3, it tells the cell to grow a dendrite, and if the long one pairs up with Par3, it will make an axon instead.

When the researchers blocked the production of the short form, the nerve cell grew multiple axons and no dendrites. When they created an artificial abundance of the short form, dendrites formed at the expense of axons. UA undergraduate student Sophie Hapak performed many of the experiments revealing how the two isoforms compete for Par3.

"We show that wiring a neuronal circuit is much more complex than previously thought," said Ghosh. "The process has a built-in robustness that explicitly defines which part of the cell is ‘positive’ and which is ‘negative.’"

"In order to have a functioning neuronal circuit, you have to have receiving and sending ends," Parker said. "Initially, when a neuron is formed, it lacks the polarity it needs once it develops into a part of a circuit. The mechanism we discovered establishes that polarity."

"How the various brain regions are wired is the basis of emotion, memory and all cognitive functions," said Ghosh, who is a member of the UA’s BIO5 Institute. "Establishing neuronal polarity in single neurons is absolutely essential for neuronal circuits to form."

"If we understand this mechanism, we could think about methods to spur new axons after the original ones were severed in a traumatic spinal cord injury, for example," Ghosh said.

The findings defy conventional wisdom, which maintains that a developing neuron will make dendrites by default unless instructed by the long form of aPKC to make an axon instead. By cultivating and studying neurons just after they formed, Parker and her group found that both forms of aPKC, long and short, are initially distributed equally throughout the cell. These forms subsequently segregate into different parts of the cell as the neuron matures and establishes polarity.

Because the cells were isolated from rat brains and kept in culture, the researchers could demonstrate that no external clues from other cells are needed to instruct a developing neuron. Whether the establishment of polarity is a random process or whether other signals yet to be identified play a role in regulating the abundance of the two aPKC varieties is not known.

Filed under axons dendrites nerve damage neurons neuronal circuit neurodegenerative diseases neuroscience science

132 notes

Study finds evidence of nerve damage in around half of fibromyalgia patients

Small study could lead to identification of treatable diseases for some with chronic pain syndrome

About half of a small group of patients with fibromyalgia – a common syndrome that causes chronic pain and other symptoms – was found to have damage to nerve fibers in their skin and other evidence of a disease called small-fiber polyneuropathy (SFPN). Unlike fibromyalgia, which has had no known causes and few effective treatments, SFPN has a clear pathology and is known to be caused by specific medical conditions, some of which can be treated and sometimes cured. The study from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) researchers will appear in the journal PAIN and has been released online.

"This provides some of the first objective evidence of a mechanism behind some cases of fibromyalgia, and identifying an underlying cause is the first step towards finding better treatments," says Anne Louise Oaklander, MD, PhD, director of the Nerve Injury Unit in the MGH Department of Neurology and corresponding author of the Pain paper.

The term fibromyalgia describes a set of symptoms – including chronic widespread pain, increased sensitivity to pressure, and fatigue – that is believed to affect 1 to 5 percent of individuals in Western countries, more frequently women. While a diagnosis of fibromyalgia has been recognized by the National Institutes of Health and the American College of Rheumatology, its biologic basis has remained unknown. Fibromyalgia shares many symptoms with SFPN, a recognized cause of chronic widespread pain for which there are accepted, objective tests.

Designed to investigate possible connections between the two conditions, the current study enrolled 27 adult patients with fibromyalgia diagnoses and 30 healthy volunteers. Participants went through a battery of tests used to diagnose SFPN, including assessments of neuropathy based on a physical examination and responses to a questionnaire, skin biopsies to evaluate the number of nerve fibers in their lower legs, and tests of autonomic functions such as heart rate, blood pressure and sweating.

The questionnaires, exam assessments, and skin biopsies all found significant levels of neuropathy in the fibromyalgia patients but not in the control group. Of the 27 fibromyalgia patients, 13 had a marked reduction in nerve fiber density, abnormal autonomic function tests or both, indicating the presence of SFPN. Participants who met criteria for SFPN also underwent blood tests for known causes of the disorder, and while none of them had results suggestive of diabetes, a common cause of SFPN, two were found to have hepatitis C virus infection, which can be successfully treated, and more than half had evidence of some type of immune system dysfunction.

"Until now, there has been no good idea about what causes fibromyalgia, but now we have evidence for some but not all patients. Fibromyalgia is too complex for a ‘one size fits all’ explanation," says Oaklander, an associate professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School. "The next step of independent confirmation of our findings from other laboratories is already happening, and we also need to follow those patients who didn’t meet SFPN criteria to see if we can find other causes. Helping any of these people receive definitive diagnoses and better treatment would be a great accomplishment."

(Source: massgeneral.org)

Filed under fibromyalgia nerve damage immune system neuropathy neurology neuroscience science

156 notes

Hope for Spinal Cord Injuries
Laura Wong has coaxed damaged nerve cells to grow and send messages to the brain again
“An ailment not to be treated,” read the prescription for a spinal cord injury on an Egyptian papyrus in 1,700 B.C. Not much has changed in the intervening millennia. Despite decades of research, modern medicine has made little headway in its quest to reverse damage to the central nervous system.
That is not to say, however, that there isn’t a glimmer of hope. Laura Wong, an M.D./Ph.D. student in Professor Eric Frank’s molecular physiology lab at the Sackler School, has been able to coax damaged nerve cells known as sensory neurons to regenerate, growing as much as 10 times longer than previously documented. What’s more, the new neurons make organized connections with their counterparts inside the spinal cord and brain stem, ensuring information from the outside world paints an accurate picture inside the brain.
“All the regeneration in the world isn’t going to make any difference if they don’t reconnect. You’re still not going to get any function,” says Wong, who has worked since 2010 in Frank’s lab, which is trying to develop therapies for spinal cord injuries.
Her findings, which she presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in 2011 and 2012, shed light on the complex processes behind nerve cell growth and regeneration. If those results can be replicated in patients, it could prevent certain types of nerve damage and improve quality of life for some.
Going the Distance
Unlike tissues such as skin and bone, the cells of the central nervous system in an adult are notoriously resistant to healing. Not only does the supply of natural growth stimulants decline as we age, but the body also produces chemicals that discourage nerve cells from regenerating. Worse, the scar tissue that starts to form immediately after a spinal cord injury also contains compounds that hinder nerve cell growth.
Researchers in Frank’s lab have been seeking ways to either stimulate growth or block the mechanisms that inhibit nerve cell growth—or both—since 2005. Wong’s predecessor in the lab, Pamela Harvey, a 2009 graduate of the Sackler School, tested a synthetic version of a nerve cell growth factor, called artemin, on crushed sensory neurons that relay information from the hands, arms and shoulders to the brain.
The damage mimics a common injury called Erb’s palsy, which can occur when a baby’s shoulder gets caught behind the mother’s pelvis during labor and delivery, creating undue strain on nerves in the newborn’s neck. Riders thrown head first off a motorcycle or snowmobile can suffer similar injuries.
“Anytime the shoulder goes one way and the head and neck go the other, that’s when you see these injuries,” Wong says.
In earlier experiments, Harvey and Frank found that treating with artemin did indeed stimulate the sensory nerve fibers to regenerate and grow back into the spinal cord over the course of about six weeks. In her follow-up experiments, Wong showed that artemin could induce those nerve fibers to grow the 3- to 4-centimeter distance from there up to the brainstem, where the brain and the spinal cord meet. That’s a little more than an inch—or roughly 10 times longer than any other researchers have been able to demonstrate with artemin or any other growth factor.
“A lot of other researchers just haven’t seen this length,” notes Wong, who saw the artemin-induced growth occur over a period of three to six months.
That’s important, because while axons only have to grow across microscopic distances in a developing embryo, they would have to bridge much wider gaps—depending on the site of the injury—to heal a neural injury in an adult, Wong says. Nerves that extend from the spine to the foot or toe can reach lengths of about 60 centimeters, she adds.
But Wong’s artemin-treated nerve fibers achieved more than unprecedented growth. They also reestablished connections with correct regions in the brain stem, just as Harvey had seen the nerve cells do in the spinal cord. That is, the axons essentially plugged themselves back in just as they were prior to the injury, and, like an old-fashioned telephone switchboard, they sent the right messages to the right parts of the brain.
That’s crucial because should the sensory nerves that relay pain signals become crossed, for example, it could result in a patient feeling phantom pain or the sensation of pain from something that shouldn’t cause discomfort at all.
“With some other growth-promoting compounds you get regeneration, but you see those axons growing kind of willy-nilly,” says Wong. “You can see where it would be just as detrimental to have things wired incorrectly as it would be to have things not wired at all.”
Just a Start
Artemin isn’t a panacea for spinal cord injuries, Wong and Frank stress. To work its cellular magic, the compound must be administered within a day or two, and the sooner the better. Also, artemin promotes growth only in sensory neurons—and so far, only in rats—which means such growth wouldn’t improve motor function for someone who had been paralyzed by a spinal cord injury, for example.
But if the findings, which Wong presented at the Society for Neuroscience meetings in 2011 and 2012, prove applicable to humans, restoring sensation alone could still improve quality of life, even for those living with paralysis. Giving these people the ability to sense heat, cold and pain could help them avoid other accidental injuries, says Frank.
Wong hopes her work with sensory neurons will help unlock the secrets to promoting regeneration of other, more obstinate types of neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. While she demonstrated that the sensory nerves plugged themselves back into the spinal cord precisely where they should have, it’s not clear how they did that.
Frank speculates that chemical cues guided the cells back into place. Should researchers be able to identify those cues, they potentially could use that knowledge to spark regeneration of other classes of neurons, such as motor neurons.
“There is hope—not proof—that even in humans these guidance molecules will persist into adulthood,” says Frank. “That means if we are able to get neurons to regenerate in patients, we might be able to make them go back to the right place. These experiments suggest we have some reason to believe it may work.”

Hope for Spinal Cord Injuries

Laura Wong has coaxed damaged nerve cells to grow and send messages to the brain again

“An ailment not to be treated,” read the prescription for a spinal cord injury on an Egyptian papyrus in 1,700 B.C. Not much has changed in the intervening millennia. Despite decades of research, modern medicine has made little headway in its quest to reverse damage to the central nervous system.

That is not to say, however, that there isn’t a glimmer of hope. Laura Wong, an M.D./Ph.D. student in Professor Eric Frank’s molecular physiology lab at the Sackler School, has been able to coax damaged nerve cells known as sensory neurons to regenerate, growing as much as 10 times longer than previously documented. What’s more, the new neurons make organized connections with their counterparts inside the spinal cord and brain stem, ensuring information from the outside world paints an accurate picture inside the brain.

“All the regeneration in the world isn’t going to make any difference if they don’t reconnect. You’re still not going to get any function,” says Wong, who has worked since 2010 in Frank’s lab, which is trying to develop therapies for spinal cord injuries.

Her findings, which she presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in 2011 and 2012, shed light on the complex processes behind nerve cell growth and regeneration. If those results can be replicated in patients, it could prevent certain types of nerve damage and improve quality of life for some.

Going the Distance

Unlike tissues such as skin and bone, the cells of the central nervous system in an adult are notoriously resistant to healing. Not only does the supply of natural growth stimulants decline as we age, but the body also produces chemicals that discourage nerve cells from regenerating. Worse, the scar tissue that starts to form immediately after a spinal cord injury also contains compounds that hinder nerve cell growth.

Researchers in Frank’s lab have been seeking ways to either stimulate growth or block the mechanisms that inhibit nerve cell growth—or both—since 2005. Wong’s predecessor in the lab, Pamela Harvey, a 2009 graduate of the Sackler School, tested a synthetic version of a nerve cell growth factor, called artemin, on crushed sensory neurons that relay information from the hands, arms and shoulders to the brain.

The damage mimics a common injury called Erb’s palsy, which can occur when a baby’s shoulder gets caught behind the mother’s pelvis during labor and delivery, creating undue strain on nerves in the newborn’s neck. Riders thrown head first off a motorcycle or snowmobile can suffer similar injuries.

“Anytime the shoulder goes one way and the head and neck go the other, that’s when you see these injuries,” Wong says.

In earlier experiments, Harvey and Frank found that treating with artemin did indeed stimulate the sensory nerve fibers to regenerate and grow back into the spinal cord over the course of about six weeks. In her follow-up experiments, Wong showed that artemin could induce those nerve fibers to grow the 3- to 4-centimeter distance from there up to the brainstem, where the brain and the spinal cord meet. That’s a little more than an inch—or roughly 10 times longer than any other researchers have been able to demonstrate with artemin or any other growth factor.

“A lot of other researchers just haven’t seen this length,” notes Wong, who saw the artemin-induced growth occur over a period of three to six months.

That’s important, because while axons only have to grow across microscopic distances in a developing embryo, they would have to bridge much wider gaps—depending on the site of the injury—to heal a neural injury in an adult, Wong says. Nerves that extend from the spine to the foot or toe can reach lengths of about 60 centimeters, she adds.

But Wong’s artemin-treated nerve fibers achieved more than unprecedented growth. They also reestablished connections with correct regions in the brain stem, just as Harvey had seen the nerve cells do in the spinal cord. That is, the axons essentially plugged themselves back in just as they were prior to the injury, and, like an old-fashioned telephone switchboard, they sent the right messages to the right parts of the brain.

That’s crucial because should the sensory nerves that relay pain signals become crossed, for example, it could result in a patient feeling phantom pain or the sensation of pain from something that shouldn’t cause discomfort at all.

“With some other growth-promoting compounds you get regeneration, but you see those axons growing kind of willy-nilly,” says Wong. “You can see where it would be just as detrimental to have things wired incorrectly as it would be to have things not wired at all.”

Just a Start

Artemin isn’t a panacea for spinal cord injuries, Wong and Frank stress. To work its cellular magic, the compound must be administered within a day or two, and the sooner the better. Also, artemin promotes growth only in sensory neurons—and so far, only in rats—which means such growth wouldn’t improve motor function for someone who had been paralyzed by a spinal cord injury, for example.

But if the findings, which Wong presented at the Society for Neuroscience meetings in 2011 and 2012, prove applicable to humans, restoring sensation alone could still improve quality of life, even for those living with paralysis. Giving these people the ability to sense heat, cold and pain could help them avoid other accidental injuries, says Frank.

Wong hopes her work with sensory neurons will help unlock the secrets to promoting regeneration of other, more obstinate types of neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. While she demonstrated that the sensory nerves plugged themselves back into the spinal cord precisely where they should have, it’s not clear how they did that.

Frank speculates that chemical cues guided the cells back into place. Should researchers be able to identify those cues, they potentially could use that knowledge to spark regeneration of other classes of neurons, such as motor neurons.

“There is hope—not proof—that even in humans these guidance molecules will persist into adulthood,” says Frank. “That means if we are able to get neurons to regenerate in patients, we might be able to make them go back to the right place. These experiments suggest we have some reason to believe it may work.”

Filed under spinal cord injuries sensory neurons nerve cells CNS nerve damage neuroscience science

131 notes

Reversing Paralysis with a Restorative Gel
Some parts of the body, like the liver, can regenerate themselves after damage. But others, such as our nervous system, are considered either irreparable or slow to recover, leaving thousands with a lifetime of pain, limited mobility, or even paralysis.
Now a team of Tel Aviv University researchers, including Dr. Shimon Rochkind of TAU’s Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Prof. Zvi Nevo of TAU’s Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, has invented a method for repairing damaged peripheral nerves. Through a biodegradable implant in combination with a newly-developed Guiding Regeneration Gel (GRG) that increases nerve growth and healing, the functionality of a torn or damaged nerve could ultimately be restored.
This innovative project is now gaining international recognition. Its initial successes were reported recently at several renowned scientific congresses, including the World Federation of Neurological Societies and the European Neurological Society. And the therapy, already tested in animal models, is only a few years away from clinical use, says Dr. Rochkind.
Like healing in the womb
A nerve is like an electrical cable. When severed or otherwise damaged, power can no longer be transferred and the cable loses its functionality. Similarly, a damaged nerve loses the ability to transfer signals for movement and feeling through the nervous system.
But Dr. Rochkind and Prof. Nevo found a way to breach the gap. In their method, two severed ends of a damaged nerve are reconnected by implanting a soft, biodegradable tube, which serves as a bridge to help the nerve ends connect. The innovative gel which lines the inside of the tube nurtures nerve fibers’ growth, encouraging the nerve to reconnect the severed ends through the tube, even in cases with massive nerve damage, Dr. Rochkind says.
The key lies in the composition of the gel, the researchers say, which has three main components: anti-oxidants, which exhibit high anti-inflammatory activities; synthetic laminin peptides, which act as a railway or track for the nerve fibers to grow along; and hyaluronic acid, commonly found in the human fetus, which serves as a buffer against drying, a major danger for most implants. These components allow the nerve to heal the way a fetus does in the womb — quickly and smoothly.
Keeping cells safe for transplant
The implant has already been tested in animal models, and the gel by itself can be used as a stand-alone product, acting as an aid to cell therapy. GRG is not only able to preserve cells, it can support their survival while being used for therapy and transplantation, says Dr. Rochkind. When grown in the gel, cells show excellent development, as well as intensive fiber growth. This could have implications for the treatment of diseases such as Parkinson’s, for which researchers are actively exploring cell therapy as a potential solution.

Reversing Paralysis with a Restorative Gel

Some parts of the body, like the liver, can regenerate themselves after damage. But others, such as our nervous system, are considered either irreparable or slow to recover, leaving thousands with a lifetime of pain, limited mobility, or even paralysis.

Now a team of Tel Aviv University researchers, including Dr. Shimon Rochkind of TAU’s Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Prof. Zvi Nevo of TAU’s Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, has invented a method for repairing damaged peripheral nerves. Through a biodegradable implant in combination with a newly-developed Guiding Regeneration Gel (GRG) that increases nerve growth and healing, the functionality of a torn or damaged nerve could ultimately be restored.

This innovative project is now gaining international recognition. Its initial successes were reported recently at several renowned scientific congresses, including the World Federation of Neurological Societies and the European Neurological Society. And the therapy, already tested in animal models, is only a few years away from clinical use, says Dr. Rochkind.

Like healing in the womb

A nerve is like an electrical cable. When severed or otherwise damaged, power can no longer be transferred and the cable loses its functionality. Similarly, a damaged nerve loses the ability to transfer signals for movement and feeling through the nervous system.

But Dr. Rochkind and Prof. Nevo found a way to breach the gap. In their method, two severed ends of a damaged nerve are reconnected by implanting a soft, biodegradable tube, which serves as a bridge to help the nerve ends connect. The innovative gel which lines the inside of the tube nurtures nerve fibers’ growth, encouraging the nerve to reconnect the severed ends through the tube, even in cases with massive nerve damage, Dr. Rochkind says.

The key lies in the composition of the gel, the researchers say, which has three main components: anti-oxidants, which exhibit high anti-inflammatory activities; synthetic laminin peptides, which act as a railway or track for the nerve fibers to grow along; and hyaluronic acid, commonly found in the human fetus, which serves as a buffer against drying, a major danger for most implants. These components allow the nerve to heal the way a fetus does in the womb — quickly and smoothly.

Keeping cells safe for transplant

The implant has already been tested in animal models, and the gel by itself can be used as a stand-alone product, acting as an aid to cell therapy. GRG is not only able to preserve cells, it can support their survival while being used for therapy and transplantation, says Dr. Rochkind. When grown in the gel, cells show excellent development, as well as intensive fiber growth. This could have implications for the treatment of diseases such as Parkinson’s, for which researchers are actively exploring cell therapy as a potential solution.

Filed under nerve damage paralysis peripheral nerves regeneration gel implants neuroscience science

35 notes

For some, deep brain stimulation brings lasting improvement in neuropathic pain

For many patients with difficult-to-treat neuropathic pain, deep brain stimulation (DBS) can lead to long-term improvement in pain scores and other outcomes, according to a study in the February issue of Neurosurgery, official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health.

About two-thirds of eligible patients who undergo DBS achieve significant and lasting benefits in terms of pain, quality of life, and overall health, according to the report by Sandra G.J. Boccard, PhD, and colleagues of University of Oxford, led by Tipu Aziz FMedSci and Alex Green, MD. Some outcomes show continued improvement after the first year, according to the new report, which is one of the largest studies of DBS for neuropathic pain performed to date.

Most Patients Benefit from DBS for Neuropathic Pain

The authors reviewed their 12-year experience with DBS for neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain is a common and difficult-to-treat type of pain caused by nerve damage, seen in patients with trauma, diabetes, and other conditions. Phantom limb pain after amputation is an example of neuropathic pain.

In DBS, a small electrode is surgically placed in a precise location in the brain. A mild electrical current is delivered to stimulate that area of the brain, with the goal of interrupting abnormal activity. Deep brain stimulation has become a standard and effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Although DBS has also been used to treat various types of chronic pain, its role in patients with neuropathic pain remains unclear.

Between 1999 and 2011, that authors’ program evaluated 197 patients with chronic neuropathic pain for eligibility for DBS. Of these, 85 patients proceeded to DBS treatment. The remaining patients did not receive DBS—most commonly because they were unable to secure funding from the U.K. National Health Service or decided not to undergo electrode placement surgery.

The patients who underwent DBS were 60 men and 25 women, average age 52 years. Stroke was the most common cause of neuropathic pain, followed by head and face pain, spinal disease, amputation, and injury to nerves from the upper spinal cord (brachial plexus).

In 74 patients, a trial of DBS produced sufficient pain relief to proceed with implantation of an electrical pulse generator. Of 59 patients with sufficient follow-up data, 39 had significant improvement in their overall health status up to four years later. Thus, 66 percent of patients “gained benefit and efficacy” by undergoing DBS.

Benefits Vary by Cause; Some Outcomes Improve with Time

The benefits of DBS varied for patients with different causes of neuropathic pain. Treatment was beneficial for 89 percent for patients with amputation and 70 percent of those with stroke, compared to 50 percent of those with brachial plexus injury.

On average, scores on a 10-point pain scale (with 10 indicating the most severe pain) decreased from about 8 to 4 within the first three months, remaining about the same with longer follow-up. Continued follow-up in a small number of patients suggested further improvement in other outcomes, including quality-of-life scores.

Deep brain stimulation has long been regarded as potentially useful for patients with severe neuropathic pain that is not relieved by other treatments. However, because of the difficulties of performing studies of this highly specialized treatment, there has been relatively little research to confirm its benefits; only about 1,500 patients have been treated worldwide. The new study—accounting for about five percent of all reported patients—used up-to-date DBS technologies, imaging, and surgical techniques.

Dr. Boccard and coauthors acknowledge some important limitations of their study—especially the lack of complete patient follow-up. However, they believe their experience is sufficiently encouraging to warrant additional studies, especially with continued advances in stimulation approaches and technology. The researchers conclude, “Clinical trials retaining patients in long-term follow-up are desirable to confirm findings from prospectively assessed case series.”

(Source: eurekalert.org)

Filed under deep brain stimulation phantom limb pain chronic pain neuropathic pain nerve damage neuroscience science

88 notes

Glial cells assist in the repair of injured nerves
Unlike the brain and spinal cord, the peripheral nervous system has an astonishing capacity for regeneration following injury. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine in Göttingen have discovered that, following nerve damage, peripheral glial cells produce the growth factor neuregulin1, which makes an important contribution to the regeneration of damaged nerves.
From their cell bodies to their terminals in muscle or skin, neuronal extensions or axons in the peripheral nervous system are surrounded along their entire length by glial cells. These cells, which are known as Schwann cells, envelop the axons with an insulating sheath called myelin, which enables the rapid transmission of electrical impulses. Following injury to a peripheral nerve, the damaged axons degenerate. After a few weeks, however, they regenerate and are then recovered with myelin by the Schwann cells. For thus far unexplained reasons, however, the Schwann cells do not manage to regenerate the myelin sheaths completely. Thus the function of damaged nerves often remains permanently impaired and certain muscles remain paralysed in affected patients.
In a current research study, the scientists have succeeded in showing that the growth factor neuregulin1 supports nerve repair and the redevelopment of the myelin layer. This protein is usually produced by neurons and is localised on axons where it acts as an important signal for the maturation of Schwann cells and myelin formation. Because the axons rapidly degenerate after injury, the remaining Schwann cells lose their contact with the axons. They thus lack the neuregulin1 signal of the nervous fibres. “In the phase following nerve damage, in which the axons are missing, the Schwann cells must carry out many tasks without the help of axonal signals. If the Schwann cells cannot overcome this first major obstacle in the aftermath of nerve injury, the nerve cannot be adequately repaired,” explains Ruth Stassart, one of the study authors.
To prevent this, the Schwann cells themselves take over the production of the actual neuronal signal molecule. After nerve damage, they synthesise the neuregulin1 protein until the axons have grown again. With the help of genetically modified mice, the researchers working on this study were able to show that the neuregulin1 produced in Schwann cells is necessary for the new maturation of the Schwann cells and the regeneration of the myelin sheath after injury. “In mice that lack the neuregulin1 gene in their Schwann cells, the already incomplete nerve regeneration process is extensively impaired,” explains co-author Robert Fledrich.
The researchers would now like to examine in greater detail how the Schwann cells contribute to the complete repair of myelinated axons after nerve damage, so that this information can also be used for therapeutic purposes.

Glial cells assist in the repair of injured nerves

Unlike the brain and spinal cord, the peripheral nervous system has an astonishing capacity for regeneration following injury. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine in Göttingen have discovered that, following nerve damage, peripheral glial cells produce the growth factor neuregulin1, which makes an important contribution to the regeneration of damaged nerves.

From their cell bodies to their terminals in muscle or skin, neuronal extensions or axons in the peripheral nervous system are surrounded along their entire length by glial cells. These cells, which are known as Schwann cells, envelop the axons with an insulating sheath called myelin, which enables the rapid transmission of electrical impulses. Following injury to a peripheral nerve, the damaged axons degenerate. After a few weeks, however, they regenerate and are then recovered with myelin by the Schwann cells. For thus far unexplained reasons, however, the Schwann cells do not manage to regenerate the myelin sheaths completely. Thus the function of damaged nerves often remains permanently impaired and certain muscles remain paralysed in affected patients.

In a current research study, the scientists have succeeded in showing that the growth factor neuregulin1 supports nerve repair and the redevelopment of the myelin layer. This protein is usually produced by neurons and is localised on axons where it acts as an important signal for the maturation of Schwann cells and myelin formation. Because the axons rapidly degenerate after injury, the remaining Schwann cells lose their contact with the axons. They thus lack the neuregulin1 signal of the nervous fibres. “In the phase following nerve damage, in which the axons are missing, the Schwann cells must carry out many tasks without the help of axonal signals. If the Schwann cells cannot overcome this first major obstacle in the aftermath of nerve injury, the nerve cannot be adequately repaired,” explains Ruth Stassart, one of the study authors.

To prevent this, the Schwann cells themselves take over the production of the actual neuronal signal molecule. After nerve damage, they synthesise the neuregulin1 protein until the axons have grown again. With the help of genetically modified mice, the researchers working on this study were able to show that the neuregulin1 produced in Schwann cells is necessary for the new maturation of the Schwann cells and the regeneration of the myelin sheath after injury. “In mice that lack the neuregulin1 gene in their Schwann cells, the already incomplete nerve regeneration process is extensively impaired,” explains co-author Robert Fledrich.

The researchers would now like to examine in greater detail how the Schwann cells contribute to the complete repair of myelinated axons after nerve damage, so that this information can also be used for therapeutic purposes.

Filed under schwann cells nerve damage nerve tissue neuron cells myelin sheath neuroscience science

56 notes

Nerve signal discovery backs Nobel winner’s theory

Scientists have proved a 60-year-old theory about how nerve signals are sent around the body at varying speeds as electrical impulses.

Researchers tested how these signals are transmitted through nerve fibres, which enables us to move and recognise sensations such as touch and smell.

The findings from the University of Edinburgh have validated an idea first proposed by Nobel laureate Sir Andrew Huxley.

It has been known for many years that an insulating layer – known as myelin – which surrounds nerve fibres is crucial in determining how quickly these signals are sent.

This insulating myelin is interrupted at regular intervals along the nerve by gaps called nodes.

Scientists, whose work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, have now proved that the longer the distance between nodes, the quicker the nerve fibres send signals down the nerves.

The theory that the distance between these gaps might affect the speed of electrical signals was first proposed by Sir Andrew Huxley, who won the Nobel Prize in 1963 for his work on electrical signalling in the nervous system, and who died earlier this year.

The study, published in the journal Current Biology, will help provide insight into what happens in people with nerve damage. It will also shed light on how nerves develop before and after birth.

Professor Peter Brophy, Director of the University of Edinburgh’s Centre for Neuroregeneration, said: “The study gives us greater insight into how the central and peripheral nervous systems work and what happens after nerves become injured. We know that peripheral nerves have the capacity to repair, but shorter lengths of insulation around the nerve fibres after repair affect the speed with which impulses are sent around the body.”

The researchers found that when the myelin reached a certain length, the speed with which nerves impulses were conducted reached a peak.

The study, carried out in mice, also confirmed that a protein – periaxin – plays a key role in regulating the length of myelin layers around nerve fibres.

(Source: eurekalert.org)

Filed under nerve signals electrical signals periheral nerves nerve damage neuroscience biology science

free counters