Posts tagged microbes
Articles and news from the latest research reports.
New studies reveal connections between animals’ microbial communities and behavior
New research is revealing surprising connections between animal microbiomes—the communities of microbes that live inside animals’ bodies—and animal behavior, according to a paper by University of Georgia ecologist Vanessa O. Ezenwa and her colleagues. The article, just published in the Perspectives section of the journal Science, reviews recent developments in this emerging research area and offers questions for future investigation.
The paper grew out of a National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop on new ways to approach the study of animal behavior. Ezenwa, an associate professor in the UGA Odum School of Ecology and College of Veterinary Medicine department of infectious diseases, and her coauthors were interested in the relationship between animal behavior and beneficial microbes.
Most research on the interactions between microbes and their animal hosts has focused on pathogens, Ezenwa said. Less is known about beneficial microbes or animal microbiomes, but several recent studies have begun to explore these connections.
"We know that animal behavior plays a critical role in establishing microbiomes," she said. "Once they’re established, the microbiomes then influence animal behavior in lots of ways that have far-reaching consequences. That’s what we were trying to highlight in this article."
(Image credit: sankax)
'Genomic CSI' Helps Contain a Killer
22 August 2012
In June of last year, a 43-year old woman was admitted to the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, for a lung disease. Doctors knew she was carrying a highly resistant form of a deadly bacterium known as Klebsiella pneumoniae—although it didn’t make her sick—and they placed her in isolation. When the woman was discharged, no one else appeared to have become infected. A few weeks later, however, another patient was found to be carrying the bacterium, and over the next 3 months, 12 more intensive care patients contracted it. Six died as a direct result of the infection.
Doctors could not make sense of the outbreak with the usual methods: A survey of bed locations showed that the first patient had had no direct contact with any of the others and, in theory, Klebsiella might have been introduced into the hospital multiple times. So physicians turned to the bacterium’s genome for answers. The approach, known as genomic epidemiology, helped them track the path of the microbe, contain the disease, and save lives, according to a new study.
Tracking a killer. Full-genome sequencing revealed the movements of Klebsiella (shown) within one hospital. Credit: Image courtesy of Adrian Zelazny
Genomic epidemiology makes use of the fact that when bacteria divide, they accumulate mutations. As a result, the bacterial genome differs slightly—often by just one or two letters of genetic code, or base pairs—from one patient to the next. By fully sequencing the genomes of patients’ bacteria and finding these minute differences, researchers can track microbial movements with unprecedented precision. The technique has already been used to reconstruct the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) around the world and to pinpoint the origin of a cholera outbreak in Haiti.
It also helped the doctors at the hospital in Bethesda. Comparing the genomes from all patients showed that the female patient admitted in June had indeed initiated the outbreak; the researchers showed that the bacteria had been transmitted from her to other patients three times independently. Apparently, transmission occurred in ways the researchers didn’t understand, says Tara Palmore, an infectious disease physician at the hospital. “When we realized there was more than met the eye, we started testing everyone in the hospital,” she says. That helped identify four more infected patients outside the intensive care unit, the scientists report online today in Science Translational Medicine. They were quickly isolated, which Palmore believes prevented further spread.
Just how the microbes were transmitted is still unclear. Palmore assumes that the bacteria mainly traveled on the hands of doctors. But the clinic had stationed a person outside the isolation rooms to make sure everyone who entered followed a hygiene regimen 24/7. That suggests that bacteria might have established colonies on surfaces or medical equipment and spread that way as well. “The conventional wisdom is that Klebsiellas do not really survive in the environment, but we found them in six sink drains and a ventilator,” Palmore says.
"This small study demonstrates the potential power of whole genome sequencing for outbreak investigation and surveillance," says Sharon Peacock, a microbiologist at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom who was not involved in the work. And infectious disease specialist Dag Harmsen of the University Clinic of Münster in Germany says it is "further proof that the time is ripe for using genomic sequencing of pathogens in a hospital setting." The paper also highlights the dangers of resistant Gram-negative bacteria like Klebsiella p., he adds. In many patients, the bacteria were not susceptible to any available antibiotic; not even to colistin, an old compound used only when all else fails. “This is even more dramatic than MRSA, because you have nothing left to treat the patients with,” Harmsen says. Since the outbreak, every patient at the hospital is checked for such dangerous pathogens; one more resistant Klebsiella case—although a different strain—has been found so far.
Genomic epidemiology could make it easier for hospitals to deal with similar outbreaks, Palmore says. “A lot of academic centers have the ability to do this now,” she says. The cost is becoming less of an issue; during last year’s outbreak, scientists still paid about $2000 per genome sequenced; now that would be closer to $500. But Peacock cautions that it still takes bioinformatics specialists several weeks to interpret the data. “This technology will not be applicable to routine clinical practice until automated interpretation tools become available.”
(Source: news.sciencemag.org)
Microbes manipulate your mind
Gut bacteria may influence thoughts and behaviour
The human gut contains a diverse community of bacteria that colonize the large intestine in the days following birth and vastly outnumber our own cells. These so-called gut microbiota constitute a virtual organ within an organ, and influence many bodily functions. Among other things, they aid in the uptake and metabolism of nutrients, modulate the inflammatory response to infection, and protect the gut from other, harmful micro-organisms. A study by researchers at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario now suggests that gut bacteria may also influence behaviour and cognitive processes such as memory by exerting an effect on gene activity during brain development.
Image: Brian Stauffer
Jane Foster and her colleagues compared the performance of germ-free mice, which lack gut bacteria, with normal animals on the elevated plus maze, which is used to test anxiety-like behaviours. This consists of a plus-shaped apparatus with two open and two closed arms, with an open roof and raised up off the floor. Ordinarily, mice will avoid open spaces to minimize the risk of being seen by predators, and spend far more time in the closed than in the open arms when placed in the elevated plus maze.
This is exactly what the researchers found when they placed the normal mice into the apparatus. The animals spent far more time in the closed arms of the maze and rarely ventured into the open ones. The germ-free mice, on the other hand, behaved quite differently – they entered the open arms more often, and continued to explore them throughout the duration of the test, spending significantly more time there than in the closed arms.
(Source: Guardian)