Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

Posts tagged lifespan

234 notes

Blocking pain receptors extends lifespan, boosts metabolism in mice

Blocking a pain receptor in mice not only extends their lifespan, it also gives them a more youthful metabolism, including an improved insulin response that allows them to deal better with high blood sugar.

image

"We think that blocking this pain receptor and pathway could be very, very useful not only for relieving pain, but for improving lifespan and metabolic health, and in particular for treating diabetes and obesity in humans," said Andrew Dillin, a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and senior author of a new paper describing these results. "As humans age they report a higher incidence of pain, suggesting that pain might drive the aging process."

The “hot” compound in chili peppers, capsaicin, is already known to activate this pain receptor, called TRPV1 (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1). In fact, TRPV1 is often called the capsaicin receptor. Constant activation of the receptor on a nerve cell results in death of the neuron, mimicking loss of TRPV1, which could explain why diets rich in capsaicin have been linked to a lower incidence of diabetes and metabolic problems in humans.

More relevant therapeutically, however, is an anti-migraine drug already on the market that inhibits a protein called CGRP that is triggered by TRPV1, producing an effect similar to that caused by blocking TRPV1. Dillin showed that giving this drug to older mice restored their metabolic health to that of younger mice.

"Our findings suggest that pharmacological manipulation of TRPV1 and CGRP may improve metabolic health and longevity," said Dillin, who is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and the Thomas and Stacey Siebel Distinguished Chair in Stem Cell Research. "Alternatively, chronic ingestion of compounds that affect TRPV1 might help prevent metabolic decline with age and lead to increased longevity in humans."

Dillin and his colleagues at UC Berkeley and The Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., will publish their results in the May 22 issue of the journal Cell.

Pain and obesity

TRPV1 is a receptor found in the skin, nerves and joints that reacts to extremely high temperatures and other painful stimuli. The receptor is also found in nerve fibers that contact the pancreas, where it stimulates the release of substances that cause inflammation or, like CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide), prevent insulin release. Insulin promotes the uptake of sugar from the blood and storage in the body’s tissue, including fat.

Past research has shown that mice lacking TRPV1 are protected against diet-induced obesity, suggesting that this receptor plays a role in metabolism. Disrupting sensory perception also increases longevity in worms and flies. But until now, it was not known whether sensory perception also affects aging in mammals.

Dillin and his team have now found that mice genetically manipulated to lack TRPV1 receptors lived, on average, nearly four months – or about 14 percent – longer than normal mice. The TRPV1-deficient mice also showed signs of a youthful metabolism late in life, due to low levels of CGRP — a molecule that blocks insulin release resulting in increased blood glucose levels and thus could contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes. Throughout aging, these mice showed improved ability to quickly clear sugar from the blood as well as signs that they could burn more calories without increasing exercise levels.

Moreover, old mice treated with the anti-migraine drug, which inhibits the activity of CGRP receptors, showed a more youthful metabolic profile than untreated old mice.

UC Berkeley and The Salk Institute filed a patent May 16 on the technology described in the Cell paper. Dillin plans to continue his studies of the effects of TRPV1 and CGRP blockers on mice and, if possible, humans.

(Source: eurekalert.org)

Filed under TRPV1 pain pain receptors longevity lifespan obesity neuroscience science

109 notes

Taste Test: Could sense of taste affect length of life?

Perhaps one of the keys to good health isn’t just what you eat but how you taste it.

image

Taste buds – yes, the same ones you may blame for that sweet tooth or French fry craving – may in fact have a powerful role in a long and healthy life – at least for fruit flies, say two new studies that appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

Researchers from the University of Michigan, Wayne State University and Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Switzerland found that suppressing the animal’s ability to taste its food –regardless of how much it actually eats – can significantly increase or decrease its length of life and potentially promote healthy aging.
 
Bitter tastes could have negative effects on lifespan, sweet tastes had positive effects, and the ability to taste water had the most significant impact – flies that could not taste water lived up to 43% longer than other flies. The findings suggest that in fruit flies, the loss of taste may cause physiological changes to help the body adapt to the perception that it’s not getting adequate nutrients.

In the case of flies whose loss of water taste led to a longer life, authors say the animals may attempt to compensate for a perceived water shortage by storing greater amounts of fat and subsequently using these fat stores to produce water internally. Further studies are planned to better explore how and why bitter and sweet tastes affect aging.

“This brings us further understanding about how sensory perception affects health. It turns out that taste buds are doing more than we think,” says senior author of the University of Michigan-led study Scott Pletcher, Ph.D., associate professor in the Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and research associate professor at the Institute of Gerontology.

“We know they’re able to help us avoid or be attracted to certain foods but in fruit flies, it appears that taste may also have a very profound effect on the physiological state and healthy aging.”
 
Pletcher conducted the study with lead author Michael Waterson, a Ph.D graduate student in U-M’s Cellular and Molecular Biology Program.  

“Our world is shaped by our sensory abilities that help us navigate our surroundings and by dissecting how this affects aging, we can lay the groundwork for new ideas to improve our health,” says senior author of the other study, Joy Alcedo, Ph.D, assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Wayne State University, formerly of the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Switzerland. Alcedo conducted the research with lead author Ivan Ostojic, Ph.D., of the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Switzerland.

Recent studies suggest that sensory perception may influence health-related characteristics such as athletic performance, type II diabetes, and aging. The two new studies, however, provide the first detailed look into the role of taste perception.

“These findings help us better understand the influence of sensory signals, which we now know not only tune an organism into its environment but also cause substantial changes in physiology that affect overall health and longevity,” Waterson says. “We need further studies to help us apply this knowledge to health in humans potentially through tailored diets favoring certain tastes or even pharmaceutical compounds that target taste inputs without diet alterations.”

(Source: uofmhealth.org)

Filed under taste taste buds sensory perception fruit flies lifespan aging neuroscience science

73 notes

Separate lives: Neuronal and organismal lifespans decoupled

Replicative aging (also known as replicative senescence) causes mammalian cells to undergo a process of growth arrest dependent on telomeres (the shortening of repeated sequences at the ends of chromosomes). Neurons, on the other hand, are exempt from aging, and so the question of their actual lifespan has remained unanswered. Recently, however, scientists at the University of Pavia and the University of Turin demonstrated that neuronal lifespan is not limited by the organism’s maximum lifespan but, remarkably, continues when transplanted in a longer-living host. The researchers accomplished this by transplanting embryonic mouse cerebellar precursors into the developing brain of longer-living rats, in which the grafted mouse neurons survived for up to three years – twice the average lifespan of the donor mice.

image

Dr. Lorenzo Magrassi discussed the challenges he and his colleagues, Dr. Ketty Leto and Dr. Ferdinando Rossi, encountered in their research. “Cell transplantation into the developing rat brain is a technique that was originally developed by us and other research groups in the early nineties of the last century,” Magrassi tells Medical Xpress. “In recent years, we improved the protocol that, now standardized, allows reliable implantation rates with good survival rates.” While not all implanted embryos develop into adult animals carrying a viable transplant, Magrassi adds, the percentage of those that do is sufficient to plan a long-term survival experiment involving roughly 100 such successfully-born animals.

In addressing these challenges, Magrassi says that together with the intrinsic bonus of studying cells inside the nervous system, which is immunoprivileged, they transplanted cells before development of the thymus (a specialized organ of the immune system) was complete. The latter can help induce immunological tolerance in the host to the engrafted cells.

One remaining question is if their research can potentially be extended to determine whether or not a maximum lifespan exists for any postmitotic mammalian cells – Including neurons. “Similar techniques can, in principle, be extended to other organs containing perennial cells,” Magrassi notes, “but we don’t have direct experience with injecting cells into organs outside of the central nervous system.” Since the central nervous system is privileged compared to other organs that are more prone to immunological surveillance and attack, a major problem when transferring their experimental paradigm to other organs, he explains, could be an increase in immunological problems.

The scientists say their results suggest that neuronal survival and aging are coincidental but separable processes, thus increasing the hope that extending organismal lifespan by dietary, behavioral, and pharmacologic interventions will not necessarily result in a neuronally depleted brain. “Even after taking into account the obvious species differences, our results in rodents can be extrapolated by analogy to humans and other longer-living species where this sort of experiment is impossible,” Magrassi explains. “Our findings suggest that extending life by extending average organismal lifespan – a hallmark of all technologically advanced societies – will not necessarily result in neuron-impoverished brains well before the longer-living individual dies.” This bodes well for those studying life extension: Their efforts are not intrinsically futile, Magrassi notes, because in the absence of pathology, prolonging life span does not necessarily mean dementia due to widespread loss of neurons, as many people still think. “Roughly speaking,” Magrassi illustrates, “if the average lifespan of humans is now 80 years, our results suggest that at ages up to 160 years our neurons can survive if not hit by specific insults.

That said, however, Magrassi acknowledges that neuronal death is not the only effect of normal aging in the brain. “For example,” he illustrates, “cerebellar neurons – which in term of synaptic loss behave like the majority of neurons in the brain – show a substantial loss of dendritic branches, spines and synapses in normal aging. In our research, we studied transplanted mouse Purkinje cells to determine if their spine density decreased with time at the same rate of Purkinje cells in the mouse or in the rat.” Purkinje cells are large GABAergic (that is, gamma-Aminobutyric acid-producing) neurons, with many branching extensions, found in the cortex of the cerebellum. “The results of our experiments indicate that age-related progressive spine loss of grafted mouse Purkinje cells follows a slower pace, typical of the longer living rat, thus reaching absolute levels of spine loss comparable to those observed in aged mice at much longer survival times that are typical of the rat.”

Moreover, Magrassi adds that their experiments clearly show that by escaping immunological rejection, transplanted neurons can survive undisturbed for the entire life of the host. “This has implications for the ongoing discussion of the detrimental effects of immune attacks on transplanted neural cells for therapeutic purposes,”

Moving forward, in order to screen for intra- and extracellular changes that could be responsible for the long term survival of the mouse cells transplanted into rat brains – as well as the slowdown of dendritic spine loss – the team is planning to perform host and transplanted cell microdissection followed by a proteomic approach. “If we discover what factor or factors cause those changes,” Magrassi points out, “we could hopefully then develop more efficient drugs for treating all pathological neurodegenerative conditions in which neurons start to lose synaptic contacts and die well before organismal death – for example, dementia, memory loss and cognitive impairment. Of course,” he adds, “this work is still in progress and the results are preliminary.”

In addition, the scientists are currently testing xenotransplantation using different transgenic mouse strains with altered aging pathways as donors to characterize the pathways that led to their results.

Magrassi sees other areas of research that might benefit from their study. “Knowing that neuronal aging in rodents is not a cell-autonomous process is important not only for neuroscience,” he concludes. “It also has implications for evolutionary biology and epidemiology.”

(Source: medicalxpress.com)

Filed under aging lifespan mammalian cells cell transplantation immune system neurons neuroscience science

80 notes

New Study Validates Longevity Pathway
A new study demonstrates what researchers consider conclusive evidence that the red wine compound resveratrol directly activates a protein that promotes health and longevity in animal models.
What’s more, the researchers have uncovered the molecular mechanism for this interaction, and show that a class of more potent drugs currently in clinical trials act in a similar fashion. Pharmaceutical compounds similar to resveratrol may potentially treat and prevent diseases related to aging in people, the authors contend.
These findings are published in the March 8 issue of Science.
For the last decade, the science of aging has increasingly focused on sirtuins, a group of genes that are believed to protect many organisms, including mammals, against diseases of aging. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that resveratrol, a compound found in the skin of grapes as well as in peanuts and berries, increases the activity of a specific sirtuin, SIRT1, that protects the body from diseases by revving up the mitochondria, a kind of cellular battery that slowly runs down as we age. By recharging the batteries, SIRT1 can have profound effects on health.
Mice on resveratrol have twice the endurance and are relatively immune from effects of obesity and aging. In experiments with yeast, nematodes, bees, flies and mice, lifespan has been extended.
“In the history of pharmaceuticals, there has never been a drug that binds to a protein to make it run faster in the way that resveratrol activates SIRT1,” said David Sinclair, Harvard Medical School professor of genetics and senior author on the paper. “Almost all drugs either slow or block them.”
In 2006, Sinclair’s group published a study showing that resveratrol could extend the lifespan of mice, and the company Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, which was started by HMS researchers, was founded to make drugs more potent than resveratrol. (Sinclair is a co-founder of Sirtris, a GlaxoSmithKline company, and remains a scientific advisor. Sirtris currently has a number of sirtuin-activating compounds in clinical trials.)
But while numerous studies, from Sinclair’s lab and elsewhere, underscored a direct causal link between resveratrol and SIRT1, some scientists claimed the studies were flawed.
The contention lay in the way SIRT1 was studied in vitro, using a specific chemical group attached to the targets of SIRT1 that fluoresces more brightly as SIRT1 activity increases. This chemical group, however, is synthetic and does not exist in cells or in nature, and without it the experiments did not work. As a response to this, a paper published in 2010 surmised that resveratrol’s activation of SIRT1 was an experimental artifact, one that existed in the lab, but not in an actual animal. SIRT1 activity in mice was, the paper claimed, at best an indirect result of resveratrol, and perhaps even a sheer coincidence.
As a result, a debate erupted over the particular pathway that resveratrol and similar compounds affected. Does resveratrol directly activate SIRT1 or is the effect indirect? “We had six years of work telling us that this was most definitely not an artifact,” said Sinclair. “Still, we needed to figure out precisely how resveratrol works. The answer was extremely elegant.”
Sinclair and Basil Hubbard, then a doctoral student in the lab, teamed up with a group of researchers from both the National Institutes of Health and Sirtris Pharmaceuticals to address this question.
First, the team addressed the problem of the fluorescent chemical group. Why was it required for resveratrol to rev up SIRT1 in the test tube? Instead of dismissing the result as an artifact, the researchers surmised that the chemical might be mimicking molecules found naturally in the cell. These turned out to be a specific class of amino acid, the building blocks of proteins. In nature, there are three amino acids that resemble the fluorescent chemical group, one of which is tryptophan, a molecule abundant in turkey and notable for inducing drowsiness. When researchers repeated the experiment, swapping the fluorescing chemical group on the substrate with a tryptophan residue, resveratrol and similar molecules were once again able to activate SIRT1.
“We discovered a signature for activation that is in fact found in the cell and doesn’t require these other synthetic groups,” said Hubbard, first author of the study. “This was a critical result, which allowed us to bridge the gap between our biochemical and physiological findings.
“Next, we needed to identify precisely how resveratrol presses on SIRT1’s accelerator,” said Sinclair. The team tested approximately 2,000 mutants of the SIRT1 gene, eventually identifying one mutant that completely blocked resveratrol’s effect. The particular mutation resulted in the substitution of a single amino acid residue, out of the 747 that make up SIRT1. The researchers also tested hundreds of other molecules from the Sirtris library, many of which are far more powerful than resveratrol, against this mutant SIRT1. All failed to activate it.
The authors propose a model for how resveratrol works: When the molecule binds, a hinge flips, and SIRT1 becomes hyperactive.
Although these experiments occurred in a test tube, once the researchers identified the precise location of the accelerator pedal on SIRT1—and how to break it—they could test their ideas in a cell. They replaced the normal SIRT1 gene in muscle and skin cells with the accelerator-dead mutant. Now they could test precisely whether resveratrol and the drugs in development work by tweaking SIRT1 (in which case they would not work) or one of the thousands of other proteins in a cell (in which they would work). While resveratrol and the drugs tested revved up mitochondria in normal cells (an effect caused activating by SIRT1), the mutant cells were completely immune.
“This was the killer experiment,” said Sinclair. “There is no rational alternative explanation other than resveratrol directly activates SIRT1 in cells. Now that we know the exact location on SIRT1 where and how resveratrol works, we can engineer even better molecules that more precisely and effectively trigger the effects of resveratrol.”
The researchers plan on continuing academic-industry collaborations with the goal of bringing to fruition drugs that treat diseases associated with aging.

New Study Validates Longevity Pathway

A new study demonstrates what researchers consider conclusive evidence that the red wine compound resveratrol directly activates a protein that promotes health and longevity in animal models.

What’s more, the researchers have uncovered the molecular mechanism for this interaction, and show that a class of more potent drugs currently in clinical trials act in a similar fashion. Pharmaceutical compounds similar to resveratrol may potentially treat and prevent diseases related to aging in people, the authors contend.

These findings are published in the March 8 issue of Science.

For the last decade, the science of aging has increasingly focused on sirtuins, a group of genes that are believed to protect many organisms, including mammals, against diseases of aging. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that resveratrol, a compound found in the skin of grapes as well as in peanuts and berries, increases the activity of a specific sirtuin, SIRT1, that protects the body from diseases by revving up the mitochondria, a kind of cellular battery that slowly runs down as we age. By recharging the batteries, SIRT1 can have profound effects on health.

Mice on resveratrol have twice the endurance and are relatively immune from effects of obesity and aging. In experiments with yeast, nematodes, bees, flies and mice, lifespan has been extended.

“In the history of pharmaceuticals, there has never been a drug that binds to a protein to make it run faster in the way that resveratrol activates SIRT1,” said David Sinclair, Harvard Medical School professor of genetics and senior author on the paper. “Almost all drugs either slow or block them.”

In 2006, Sinclair’s group published a study showing that resveratrol could extend the lifespan of mice, and the company Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, which was started by HMS researchers, was founded to make drugs more potent than resveratrol. (Sinclair is a co-founder of Sirtris, a GlaxoSmithKline company, and remains a scientific advisor. Sirtris currently has a number of sirtuin-activating compounds in clinical trials.)

But while numerous studies, from Sinclair’s lab and elsewhere, underscored a direct causal link between resveratrol and SIRT1, some scientists claimed the studies were flawed.

The contention lay in the way SIRT1 was studied in vitro, using a specific chemical group attached to the targets of SIRT1 that fluoresces more brightly as SIRT1 activity increases. This chemical group, however, is synthetic and does not exist in cells or in nature, and without it the experiments did not work. As a response to this, a paper published in 2010 surmised that resveratrol’s activation of SIRT1 was an experimental artifact, one that existed in the lab, but not in an actual animal. SIRT1 activity in mice was, the paper claimed, at best an indirect result of resveratrol, and perhaps even a sheer coincidence.

As a result, a debate erupted over the particular pathway that resveratrol and similar compounds affected. Does resveratrol directly activate SIRT1 or is the effect indirect? “We had six years of work telling us that this was most definitely not an artifact,” said Sinclair. “Still, we needed to figure out precisely how resveratrol works. The answer was extremely elegant.”

Sinclair and Basil Hubbard, then a doctoral student in the lab, teamed up with a group of researchers from both the National Institutes of Health and Sirtris Pharmaceuticals to address this question.

First, the team addressed the problem of the fluorescent chemical group. Why was it required for resveratrol to rev up SIRT1 in the test tube? Instead of dismissing the result as an artifact, the researchers surmised that the chemical might be mimicking molecules found naturally in the cell. These turned out to be a specific class of amino acid, the building blocks of proteins. In nature, there are three amino acids that resemble the fluorescent chemical group, one of which is tryptophan, a molecule abundant in turkey and notable for inducing drowsiness. When researchers repeated the experiment, swapping the fluorescing chemical group on the substrate with a tryptophan residue, resveratrol and similar molecules were once again able to activate SIRT1.

“We discovered a signature for activation that is in fact found in the cell and doesn’t require these other synthetic groups,” said Hubbard, first author of the study. “This was a critical result, which allowed us to bridge the gap between our biochemical and physiological findings.

“Next, we needed to identify precisely how resveratrol presses on SIRT1’s accelerator,” said Sinclair. The team tested approximately 2,000 mutants of the SIRT1 gene, eventually identifying one mutant that completely blocked resveratrol’s effect. The particular mutation resulted in the substitution of a single amino acid residue, out of the 747 that make up SIRT1. The researchers also tested hundreds of other molecules from the Sirtris library, many of which are far more powerful than resveratrol, against this mutant SIRT1. All failed to activate it.

The authors propose a model for how resveratrol works: When the molecule binds, a hinge flips, and SIRT1 becomes hyperactive.

Although these experiments occurred in a test tube, once the researchers identified the precise location of the accelerator pedal on SIRT1—and how to break it—they could test their ideas in a cell. They replaced the normal SIRT1 gene in muscle and skin cells with the accelerator-dead mutant. Now they could test precisely whether resveratrol and the drugs in development work by tweaking SIRT1 (in which case they would not work) or one of the thousands of other proteins in a cell (in which they would work). While resveratrol and the drugs tested revved up mitochondria in normal cells (an effect caused activating by SIRT1), the mutant cells were completely immune.

“This was the killer experiment,” said Sinclair. “There is no rational alternative explanation other than resveratrol directly activates SIRT1 in cells. Now that we know the exact location on SIRT1 where and how resveratrol works, we can engineer even better molecules that more precisely and effectively trigger the effects of resveratrol.”

The researchers plan on continuing academic-industry collaborations with the goal of bringing to fruition drugs that treat diseases associated with aging.

Filed under longevity lifespan resveratrol animal model aging red wine medicine science

73 notes

A proposed link between aging, autism, and oxidation
Like any fac­tory, the body burns oxygen to get energy for its var­ious needs. As a result, detri­mental byprod­ucts are released and our cells try to clean up shop with antiox­i­dants. But as we age, this process becomes a losing battle.
“Oxi­da­tion inex­orably moves us along toward an oxi­dized state,” said phar­ma­ceu­tical sci­ences pro­fessor Richard Deth. “You have to deal with it progressively.”
One option is to slow down the syn­thesis of new pro­teins, a process that requires energy. Indeed, as we age, we pro­duce fewer new pro­teins, which explains why our capacity for learning and healing suffer as we grow old.
Since every pro­tein orig­i­nates from instruc­tions in the DNA, pro­tein syn­thesis can be slowed down by turning off par­tic­ular genes. A process called epi­ge­netic reg­u­la­tion accom­plishes the task by adding mol­e­c­ular tags on top of the genome. The pro­tein methio­nine syn­thase reg­u­lates this process. But what reg­u­lates methio­nine syn­thase? Oxidation.
“This enzyme is the most easily oxi­dized mol­e­cule in the body,” said Deth, whose research on the sub­ject was recently pub­lished in the journal PLOS ONE. The senior author for the study, Christina Mura­tore, received her doc­torate in phar­ma­ceu­tical sci­ences from North­eastern in 2010.
When­ever the body is under oxida­tive stress, Deth explained, methio­nine syn­thase, or MS, stops working. He and his team hypoth­e­sized that MS plays an impor­tant reg­u­la­tory role in aging and that it might be impaired in autism, which Deth has con­nected to unchecked oxida­tive stress in pre­vious research.
To examine their hypoth­esis, the researchers looked at post­mortem human brain sam­ples across the lifespan, with sub­jects as young as 28 weeks of fetal devel­op­ment to as old as 84 years. They mea­sured the levels of a mol­e­cule called MS mRNA, which tran­scribes the genetic code for methio­nine syn­thase into actual protein.
As the sub­jects aged, their brain tissue showed lower levels of MS mRNA. But, sur­pris­ingly, the levels of the pro­tein itself remained con­stant across the lifespan.
Deth and his col­leagues sus­pect that this observed decrease in MS mRNA over our lives may act as a check in the system to save energy that we no longer have in plen­tiful supply and to slow down oxida­tive stress. “One way that the system can guard against too much pro­tein syn­thesis is to restrict the amount of mRNA,” Deth said.
The team also com­pared MS pro­tein and mRNA levels between brain tissue sam­ples from autistic and nor­mally devel­oping sub­jects. Autistic brains had markedly less MS mRNA than the con­trol sam­ples but sim­ilar pro­tein levels. Addi­tion­ally, the age-​​dependent trend seen in nor­mally devel­oping brains was not mim­icked among the autistic sample.
If decreased MS mRNA does mean decreased pro­tein pro­duc­tion, it’s no big deal for adults who don’t need to make new pro­teins as often. But for the devel­oping brain, new pro­teins are crit­ical. “Your capacity for learning might be pre­ma­turely reduced because meta­bol­i­cally you can’t afford it,” Deth suggested.
While the results are pre­lim­i­nary and will ben­efit from repeated studies and more inves­ti­ga­tion, Deth’s find­ings add to a growing body of evi­dence linking both aging and autism to oxida­tive stress.

A proposed link between aging, autism, and oxidation

Like any fac­tory, the body burns oxygen to get energy for its var­ious needs. As a result, detri­mental byprod­ucts are released and our cells try to clean up shop with antiox­i­dants. But as we age, this process becomes a losing battle.

“Oxi­da­tion inex­orably moves us along toward an oxi­dized state,” said phar­ma­ceu­tical sci­ences pro­fessor Richard Deth. “You have to deal with it progressively.”

One option is to slow down the syn­thesis of new pro­teins, a process that requires energy. Indeed, as we age, we pro­duce fewer new pro­teins, which explains why our capacity for learning and healing suffer as we grow old.

Since every pro­tein orig­i­nates from instruc­tions in the DNA, pro­tein syn­thesis can be slowed down by turning off par­tic­ular genes. A process called epi­ge­netic reg­u­la­tion accom­plishes the task by adding mol­e­c­ular tags on top of the genome. The pro­tein methio­nine syn­thase reg­u­lates this process. But what reg­u­lates methio­nine syn­thase? Oxidation.

“This enzyme is the most easily oxi­dized mol­e­cule in the body,” said Deth, whose research on the sub­ject was recently pub­lished in the journal PLOS ONE. The senior author for the study, Christina Mura­tore, received her doc­torate in phar­ma­ceu­tical sci­ences from North­eastern in 2010.

When­ever the body is under oxida­tive stress, Deth explained, methio­nine syn­thase, or MS, stops working. He and his team hypoth­e­sized that MS plays an impor­tant reg­u­la­tory role in aging and that it might be impaired in autism, which Deth has con­nected to unchecked oxida­tive stress in pre­vious research.

To examine their hypoth­esis, the researchers looked at post­mortem human brain sam­ples across the lifespan, with sub­jects as young as 28 weeks of fetal devel­op­ment to as old as 84 years. They mea­sured the levels of a mol­e­cule called MS mRNA, which tran­scribes the genetic code for methio­nine syn­thase into actual protein.

As the sub­jects aged, their brain tissue showed lower levels of MS mRNA. But, sur­pris­ingly, the levels of the pro­tein itself remained con­stant across the lifespan.

Deth and his col­leagues sus­pect that this observed decrease in MS mRNA over our lives may act as a check in the system to save energy that we no longer have in plen­tiful supply and to slow down oxida­tive stress. “One way that the system can guard against too much pro­tein syn­thesis is to restrict the amount of mRNA,” Deth said.

The team also com­pared MS pro­tein and mRNA levels between brain tissue sam­ples from autistic and nor­mally devel­oping sub­jects. Autistic brains had markedly less MS mRNA than the con­trol sam­ples but sim­ilar pro­tein levels. Addi­tion­ally, the age-​​dependent trend seen in nor­mally devel­oping brains was not mim­icked among the autistic sample.

If decreased MS mRNA does mean decreased pro­tein pro­duc­tion, it’s no big deal for adults who don’t need to make new pro­teins as often. But for the devel­oping brain, new pro­teins are crit­ical. “Your capacity for learning might be pre­ma­turely reduced because meta­bol­i­cally you can’t afford it,” Deth suggested.

While the results are pre­lim­i­nary and will ben­efit from repeated studies and more inves­ti­ga­tion, Deth’s find­ings add to a growing body of evi­dence linking both aging and autism to oxida­tive stress.

Filed under brain oxidation autism brain tissue lifespan antioxidants protein synthesis aging medicine science

free counters