Posts tagged illusion
Articles and news from the latest research reports.
Finding the place where the brain creates illusory shapes and surfaces
The logo of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics includes red, white and blue stars, but the white star is not really there: It is an illusion. Similarly, the “S” in the USA Network logo is wholly illusory.
Both of these logos take advantage of a common perceptual illusion where the brain, when viewing a fragmented background, frequently sees shapes and surfaces that don’t really exist.
“It’s hallucinating without taking drugs,” said Alexander Maier, assistant professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University, who headed a team of neuroscientists who has pinpointed the area of the brain that is responsible for these “illusory contours.”
In the Sept. 30 online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Maier’s team reported that they have discovered groups of neurons in a region of the visual cortex called V4 that fire when an individual is viewing a pattern that produces such an illusion and remain quiescent when viewing an almost identical pattern that doesn’t.
Studies have shown that a diverse range of species, including monkeys, cats, owls, goldfish and even honeybees perceive these illusory contours. This has led scientists to propose that they are the byproduct of methods that the brain has evolved to spot predators or prey hiding in the bushes, a capability with considerable survival value.
Although scientists discovered illusory contours more than a century ago, it is only in the last 30 years that they have begun studying them because they reveal the internal mechanisms that the brain uses to interpret sensory input.
The gold square marks the location in the V4 region of a macaque’s visual cortex, where the neurons respond to visual contours. (Alex Maier, Donna Pritchett / Vanderbilt)
In mammals, visual stimuli is processed in the back of the brain in an area called the visual cortex. Efforts to map this area have found that it is made up of five different regions at the back of brain (labeled V1 to V5.)
The primary visual cortex, V1, takes the stimuli coming from the eyes and sorts it by a variety of basic properties, including orientation, color and spatial variation. It also splits the information into two pathways, called the dorsal and ventral streams.
From V1, both streams are routed to the second major area of the visual cortex. V2 performs many of the same functions as V1 but adds some more complex processing, such as recognizing the disparities in the signals coming from the two eyes that produce binocular vision.
From V2, one pathway, sometimes called the “Where Pathway,” goes to V5 and is associated with object location and motion detection. The other pathway, sometimes called the “What Pathway,” goes to V4 and is associated with object representation and form recognition.
“Studies have shown that V4 is involved in both object recognition and visual attention, so we thought it might also be involved with illusory contours,” said Michele Cox, the Vanderbilt graduate student who is first author on the study.
A Kanizsa square (Courtesy of D. Alan Stubbs, University of Maine)
First, the researchers searched for the neurons in V4 that were associated with different locations in the retinas of macaque monkeys. Once these maps were complete, they rewarded the monkeys for staring at a screen containing an example of an illusory contour called a Kanizsa square. This consists of four “Pac-Man” figures with their “mouths” oriented to form the corners of a square. When black Pac-Men are placed on a white background, the brain creates a bright white square connecting them.
While the monkeys were looking at the Kanizsa square, the researchers discovered that the neurons that represented the area in the middle of the Pac-Men, the area covered by the illusory square, began firing. However, when the monkeys viewed the same four Pac-Men with their mouths facing outward – an orientation that doesn’t produce the illusion – these central neurons remained silent.
“Basically, the brain is acting like a detective,” said Maier. “It is responding to cues in the environment and making its best guesses about how they fit together. In the case of these illusions, however, it comes to an incorrect conclusion.”
Two graphs show the activity of neurons in V4 associated with the position of the illusory Kanizsa square. The percentage of neurons firing more than doubles when the monkey views pac-men with their mouths facing inward to produce the illusion (top) compared to their activity level when the monkey is viewing pac-men with their mouths facing outward (bottom). (Michelle Cox and Alex Maier / Vanderbilt)
(Source: news.vanderbilt.edu)
Why Some People See Sound
Some people may actually see sounds, say researchers who found this odd ability is possible when the parts of the brain devoted to vision are small.
These findings points to a clever strategy the brain might use when vision is unreliable, investigators added.
Scientists took a closer look at the sound-induced flash illusion. When a single flash is followed by two bleeps, people sometimes also see two illusory consecutive flashes.
Past experiments revealed there are strong differences between individuals when it comes to how prone they are to this illusion. “Some would experience it almost every time a flash was accompanied by two bleeps, others would almost never see the second flash,” said researcher Benjamin de Haas, a neuroscientist at University College London.
These differences suggested to de Haas and his colleagues that maybe variations in brain anatomy were behind who saw the illusion and who did not. To find out, the researchers analyzed the brains of 29 volunteers with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and tested them with flashes and bleeps.
On average, the volunteers saw the illusion 62 percent of the time, although some saw it only 2 percent of the time while others saw it 100 percent of the time. They found the smaller a person’s visual cortex was — the part of the brain linked with vision —the more likely he or she experienced the illusion."If we both look at the same thing, we would expect our perception to be identical," de Haas told LiveScience. "Our results demonstrate that this not quite true in every situation — sometimes what you perceive depends on your individual brain anatomy."
The researchers suggest this illusion could reveal a way the brain compensates for imperfect visual circuitry.
How to shrink Berlusconi’s head
To perceive the effect, fix your eyes on the cross in the center of the video. Once the motion stops and the head pictures are flashed on-screen, the image on the left should appear smaller than the one on the right. If you pause the video, you’ll notice that in fact both heads are the same size.
Created by Tim Meese and colleagues at Aston University in Birmingham, UK, the illusion was presented last week at the European Conference on Visual Perception in Alghero, Italy.
(Source: newscientist.com)
The authors of the article have added another dimension to this illusion of body ownership. Using virtual reality they have shown that a virtual body with one very long arm can be incorporated into body representation. An arm up to three or possibly even four times the length of a person’s real arm can be felt as if it was the person’s own arm. This is notwithstanding the fact that having one such long arm introduces a gross asymmetry in the body. An extended body space (a body with longer limbs occupies more volume than a normal body) affects also the special space surrounding our body that is called peripersonal space — a space that when violated by objects or other people can be experienced as a threat or intimacy, depending on the context.
In the experiment 50 people experienced virtual reality where they had a virtual body. They put on a head-mounted display so that all around themselves they saw a virtual world. When they looked down towards where their body should be, they saw a virtual body instead of their real one. They had their dominant hand resting on a table with a special textured material that they could feel with their real hand, but also see their virtual hand touching it. So as they moved their real hand over the surface of this table they would see the virtual hand doing the same.
The results of the study were analysed by using a questionnaire to assess the subjective illusion that the virtual arm was part of the person’s body; a pointing task, where the arm that did not grow in length was required to point towards where the other hand was felt to be (with eyes shut), and a response to a threat task, in which a saw fell down towards the virtual hand (figure E, F) and it was measured whether people would move their real hand in an attempt to avoid it.
Based on these data, researchers found that people did have the illusion that the extended hand was their own. Even when the virtual arm was 4 times the length of the corresponding real arm, still 40-50% of participants showed signs of incorporation of the virtual arm as part of their body representation. It was also found that vision alone is a very powerful inducer of the illusion of virtual arm ownership — those who experienced the inconsistent condition where the virtual hand did not touch the table, even though the real hand felt the table top, had a strong illusion of ownership over the virtual arm.
These results show how malleable is our body representation, even incorporating strong asymmetries in the body shape, which do not correspond at all to the average human shape. This type of research will help neuroscientists to understand how the brain represents the body, and ultimately may help people overcome illnesses that are based on body image distortions.