Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

Posts tagged diazepam

106 notes

(Image credit: The insular cortex of an autism mouse model is already so strongly activated by a single sensory modality (here a sound), that it is unable to perform its role in integrating information from multiple sources. Credit: © MPI of Neurobiology / Gogolla)
Insular cortex alterations in mouse models of autism
The insular cortex is an integral “hub”, combining sensory, emotional and cognitive content. Not surprisingly, alterations in insular structure and function have been reported in many psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety disorders, depression, addiction and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Scientists from Harvard University and the Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Martinsried now describe consistent alterations in integrative processing of the insular cortex across autism mouse models of diverse etiologies. In particular, the delicate balance between excitation and inhibition in the autistic brains was disturbed, but could be pharmacologically re-adjusted. The results could help the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and by restricted and repetitive behaviors. Diagnosis is solely based on behavioral analysis as biological markers and neurological underpinnings remain unknown. This makes the development of novel therapeutic strategies extremely difficult. 
As the cellular basis of autism spectrum disorders cannot be addressed in human patients, scientists have developed a number of mouse models for the disease. Similar to humans, mice are social animals and communicate through species-specific vocalizations. The mouse models harbor all diagnostic hallmark criteria of autism, such as repetitive, stereotypic behaviors and deficits in social interactions and communication.
Nadine Gogolla and her colleagues in the laboratory of Takao Hensch at Harvard University have now searched for common neural circuit alterations in mouse models of autism. They concentrated on the insular cortex, a brain structure that contributes to social, emotional and cognitive functions. ‘We wanted to know whether we can detect differences in the way the insular cortex processes information in healthy or autism-like mice’, says Nadine Gogolla, who was recently appointed Leader of a Research Group at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology.
As the researchers now report, the insular cortex of healthy mice integrates stimuli from different sensory modalities and reacts more strongly when two different stimuli are presented concomitantly (e.g. a sound and a touch). ‘We recognize a rose more easily when we smell and see it rather than when we just see or smell it’ says Nadine Gogolla. This capacity of combining sensory stimuli was consistently affected in all autism models the researchers looked at. Interestingly, often one sense alone elicited such a strong response that adding a second modality did not add further information. This is very reminiscent of the sensory hyper-responsiveness experienced by many autistic patients. The scientist further discovered that the insular cortex of adult autism-model mice resembled the activation patterns observed in very young control mice. ‘It seemed as if the insular cortex of the autism-models did not mature properly after birth’, says Gogolla.
For proper brain function, excitation and inhibition have to be in equilibrium. In the now identified part of the insular cortex, the scientists found that this equilibrium was disturbed. In one of the mouse models, inhibitory contacts between nerve cells were strongly reduced.
To test the influence of this reduction on sensory processing, the researchers gave mice the drug Diazepam, which is also known under the trade name Valium, to boost inhibitory transmission in the brain. Indeed, this treatment transiently rescued the capacity of the insular cortex to combine stimuli of different sensory modalities. The balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain is established after birth. The scientists thus treated young animals over several days with Diazepam. This treatment was efficient in reestablishing the insular cortex capacity for sensory integration permanently, even in adult mice that did not received any further treatment. Interestingly, also the stereotypic grooming of the animals was significantly reduced.
All autism models investigated showed alterations in inhibitory molecules. However, the alterations were very diverse. While in some models certain molecules were reduced, the opposite was true in another model. These results suggest that the disequilibrium between excitation and inhibition may be an important factor in the neuropathology of autism. However, future therapies will need to be carefully tailored to each particular subgroup of autism. For instance, an artificial boost of inhibition through a drug like Diazepam in healthy mice can throw the delicate equilibrium off and create changes in the insular cortex similar to those seen in the autism models. Whether a therapeutic strategy aimed on keeping the brain’s equilibrium between excitation and inhibition could be useful and if so, how to test the individuals’ status of the excitation/inhibition balance and how to implement individually tailored treatments, would need to be established through further studies and pre-clinical tests.

(Image credit: The insular cortex of an autism mouse model is already so strongly activated by a single sensory modality (here a sound), that it is unable to perform its role in integrating information from multiple sources. Credit: © MPI of Neurobiology / Gogolla)

Insular cortex alterations in mouse models of autism

The insular cortex is an integral “hub”, combining sensory, emotional and cognitive content. Not surprisingly, alterations in insular structure and function have been reported in many psychiatric disorders, such as anxiety disorders, depression, addiction and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Scientists from Harvard University and the Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Martinsried now describe consistent alterations in integrative processing of the insular cortex across autism mouse models of diverse etiologies. In particular, the delicate balance between excitation and inhibition in the autistic brains was disturbed, but could be pharmacologically re-adjusted. The results could help the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and by restricted and repetitive behaviors. Diagnosis is solely based on behavioral analysis as biological markers and neurological underpinnings remain unknown. This makes the development of novel therapeutic strategies extremely difficult. 

As the cellular basis of autism spectrum disorders cannot be addressed in human patients, scientists have developed a number of mouse models for the disease. Similar to humans, mice are social animals and communicate through species-specific vocalizations. The mouse models harbor all diagnostic hallmark criteria of autism, such as repetitive, stereotypic behaviors and deficits in social interactions and communication.

Nadine Gogolla and her colleagues in the laboratory of Takao Hensch at Harvard University have now searched for common neural circuit alterations in mouse models of autism. They concentrated on the insular cortex, a brain structure that contributes to social, emotional and cognitive functions. ‘We wanted to know whether we can detect differences in the way the insular cortex processes information in healthy or autism-like mice’, says Nadine Gogolla, who was recently appointed Leader of a Research Group at the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology.

As the researchers now report, the insular cortex of healthy mice integrates stimuli from different sensory modalities and reacts more strongly when two different stimuli are presented concomitantly (e.g. a sound and a touch). ‘We recognize a rose more easily when we smell and see it rather than when we just see or smell it’ says Nadine Gogolla. This capacity of combining sensory stimuli was consistently affected in all autism models the researchers looked at. Interestingly, often one sense alone elicited such a strong response that adding a second modality did not add further information. This is very reminiscent of the sensory hyper-responsiveness experienced by many autistic patients. The scientist further discovered that the insular cortex of adult autism-model mice resembled the activation patterns observed in very young control mice. ‘It seemed as if the insular cortex of the autism-models did not mature properly after birth’, says Gogolla.

For proper brain function, excitation and inhibition have to be in equilibrium. In the now identified part of the insular cortex, the scientists found that this equilibrium was disturbed. In one of the mouse models, inhibitory contacts between nerve cells were strongly reduced.

To test the influence of this reduction on sensory processing, the researchers gave mice the drug Diazepam, which is also known under the trade name Valium, to boost inhibitory transmission in the brain. Indeed, this treatment transiently rescued the capacity of the insular cortex to combine stimuli of different sensory modalities. The balance between excitation and inhibition in the brain is established after birth. The scientists thus treated young animals over several days with Diazepam. This treatment was efficient in reestablishing the insular cortex capacity for sensory integration permanently, even in adult mice that did not received any further treatment. Interestingly, also the stereotypic grooming of the animals was significantly reduced.

All autism models investigated showed alterations in inhibitory molecules. However, the alterations were very diverse. While in some models certain molecules were reduced, the opposite was true in another model. These results suggest that the disequilibrium between excitation and inhibition may be an important factor in the neuropathology of autism. However, future therapies will need to be carefully tailored to each particular subgroup of autism. For instance, an artificial boost of inhibition through a drug like Diazepam in healthy mice can throw the delicate equilibrium off and create changes in the insular cortex similar to those seen in the autism models. Whether a therapeutic strategy aimed on keeping the brain’s equilibrium between excitation and inhibition could be useful and if so, how to test the individuals’ status of the excitation/inhibition balance and how to implement individually tailored treatments, would need to be established through further studies and pre-clinical tests.

Filed under insular cortex autism brain function diazepam animal model neuroscience science

59 notes

Breakthrough Study Sheds New Light on Best Medication for Children with Seizures

A recently published clinical study in the Journal of the American Medical Association has answered an urgent question that long puzzled ER pediatricians: Is the drug lorazepam really safer and more effective than diazepam – the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medication as first line therapy most often used by emergency room doctors to control major epileptic seizures in children?

The answer to that question – based on a double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared outcomes in 273 seizure patients, about half of whom were given lorazepam – is a clear-cut “no,” said Prashant V. Mahajan, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A, one of the authors of the study.

“The results of our clinical trial were very convincing, and they showed clearly that the two medications are just about equally effective and equally safe when it comes to treating status epilepticus [major epileptic brain seizures in children],” Dr. Mahajan said. “This is an important step forward for all of us who frequently treat kids in the ER for [epilepsy-related] seizures, since it answers the question about the best medication to use in ending the convulsions and getting these patients back to normal brain functioning.”

Describing the brain convulsions that were targeted by the study, its authors pointed out that status epilepticus occurs when an epilepsy-related seizure lasts more than 30 minutes. Such seizures – which occur in more than 10,000 U.S. pediatric epilepsy patients every year – can cause permanent brain damage or even death, if allowed to persist.

Published in JAMA, the study, “Lorazepam vs Diazepam for Pediatric Status Epilepticus: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” was designed to test earlier assertions by many clinicians that lorazepam was more effective at controlling pediatric seizures. The study-authors wrote, “Potential advantages proposed in some studies of lorazepam include improved effectiveness in terminating convulsions, longer duration of action compared with diazepam, and lower incidence of respiratory depression. Specific pediatric data comparing diazepam with lorazepam suggest that lorazepam might be superior, but they are limited to reports from single institutions or retrospective studies with small sample sizes, thus limiting generalizability.”

Based on data collected over four years at 11 different U.S. pediatric emergency departments, the new study found that “treatment with lorazepam [among pediatric patients with convulsive status epilepticus] did not result in improved efficacy or safety, compared with diazepam.”

That determination led the study authors to conclude: “These findings do not support the preferential use of lorazepam for this condition.”

Dr. Mahajan, a nationally recognized researcher in pediatric emergency medicine and a Wayne State University School of Medicine pediatrics professor recently appointed chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Executive Committee of the Section on Emergency Medicine, said the JAMA study provides “a compelling example of how effective research in pediatric medicine, based on treatment of patients right in the clinical setting, can play a major role in improving outcomes.”

Children’s Hospital of Michigan Chief of Pediatrics Steven E. Lipshultz, M.D., said this recent breakthrough will “undoubtedly result in better care for pediatric patients who present in the emergency room with seizures related to epilepsy.

“There’s no doubt that combining excellent research with excellent treatment is the key to achieving the highest-quality outcomes for patients – and Dr. Mahajan’s cutting-edge study is a terrific example of how kids are benefiting from the research that goes on here at Children’s every single day,” said Dr. Lipshultz.

(Source: media.wayne.edu)

Filed under epilepsy epileptic seizures lorazepam diazepam medicine science

96 notes

Widely Used Drug No More Effective Than FDA Approved Medication in Treating Epileptic Seizures in Children
A National Institutes of Health-sponsored study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) showed that lorazepam - a widely used but not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for children - is no more effective than an approved benzodiazepine, diazepam, for treating pediatric status epilepticus.
Status epilepticus is a state in which the brain is in a persistent state of seizure. By the age of 15, 4 to 8 percent of children experience a seizure episode, which can be life threatening if they aren’t stopped immediately. Status epilepticus is a continuous, unremitting seizure lasting longer than five minutes or recurrent seizures without regaining consciousness between seizures for more than five minutes.
Before this current study, published April 23, there was no evidence indicating which of the two treatments might prove more effective. Although it is not yet approved by the FDA, James M. Chamberlain, MD, Division Chief of Emergency Medicine at Children’s National Health System, the study’s principal investigator, estimates that lorazepam is used as first-line therapy in most emergency departments.
“The study results provide reassurance to emergency medicine personnel who must act within minutes,” said Chamberlain. The study was conducted at 11 hospitals in the United States using the infrastructure of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), under a contract from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
Both lorazepam and diazepam are used to treat status epilepticus. Diazepam, also known as Valium, is the only one of the two drugs to have been approved by the FDA for use in adults and children.
Lorazepam, marketed under the trade name Ativan, has been approved by the FDA only for use in adults. Once the FDA has approved a drug for use in adults, physicians may then prescribe it for other uses and in pediatric patients if, in their best judgment, they believe their patients will benefit.
“Sometimes physicians are forced to rely on their best judgment alone,” said George Giacoia, MD, of the NICHD’s Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Branch. “However, it’s always better to make treatment decisions on the evidence that comes only from conducting large comparison studies. We now know that lorezapam offers no advantage over diazepam in treating pediatric seizure disorder, and that diazepam is more suited to use by emergency teams.”
In 2007, the National Institutes of Health’s Pediatric Seizure study sought to determine which of two drugs—diazepam or lorazepam—was more effective in treating the life-threatening condition, status epilepticus. This condition can occur without warning. For reasons not fully understood, a child may be gripped by continuous seizures, which, if not stopped within minutes, may lead to brain damage or even death.
Because of the random nature of seizures and their significantly life altering affects, lorezapam is commonly prescribed to treat status epilepticus in children, even though it hasn’t been specifically approved for that use. The results of the Pediatric Seizure study do not support the use of lorezapam instead of diazepam for treating status epilepticus, Dr. Chamberlain said.  Also, because lorezapam needs to be refrigerated and diazepam does not, diazepam is more suited for use by ambulance crews.
A few previous studies indicated that lorazepam might be more effective at ending a seizure and might be less likely than diazepam to depress breathing—a side effect of benzodiazapines, the category of medications that includes both drugs.
In their study, Chamberlain and colleague wrote, “There is no conclusive evidence to support lorazepam as a superior treatment and there is little consensus as to which is the preferred agent.”
The current study was the largest, most comprehensive comparison study of the two treatments for pediatric seizure disorder. Dr. Chamberlain and his colleagues enrolled 310 children at the 11 institutions, between 2008 and 2012. The researchers found that both medications successfully halted seizures in 70 percent of cases, and each had rates of severe respiratory depression of less than 20 percent.
It’s important that “we get the most important scientific information about such medications so there are government approvals for pediatric use,” Chamberlain said. “Pediatric patients are not just small adults.”
(Image: Alamy)

Widely Used Drug No More Effective Than FDA Approved Medication in Treating Epileptic Seizures in Children

A National Institutes of Health-sponsored study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) showed that lorazepam - a widely used but not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for children - is no more effective than an approved benzodiazepine, diazepam, for treating pediatric status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus is a state in which the brain is in a persistent state of seizure. By the age of 15, 4 to 8 percent of children experience a seizure episode, which can be life threatening if they aren’t stopped immediately. Status epilepticus is a continuous, unremitting seizure lasting longer than five minutes or recurrent seizures without regaining consciousness between seizures for more than five minutes.

Before this current study, published April 23, there was no evidence indicating which of the two treatments might prove more effective. Although it is not yet approved by the FDA, James M. Chamberlain, MD, Division Chief of Emergency Medicine at Children’s National Health System, the study’s principal investigator, estimates that lorazepam is used as first-line therapy in most emergency departments.

“The study results provide reassurance to emergency medicine personnel who must act within minutes,” said Chamberlain. The study was conducted at 11 hospitals in the United States using the infrastructure of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN), under a contract from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).

Both lorazepam and diazepam are used to treat status epilepticus. Diazepam, also known as Valium, is the only one of the two drugs to have been approved by the FDA for use in adults and children.

Lorazepam, marketed under the trade name Ativan, has been approved by the FDA only for use in adults. Once the FDA has approved a drug for use in adults, physicians may then prescribe it for other uses and in pediatric patients if, in their best judgment, they believe their patients will benefit.

“Sometimes physicians are forced to rely on their best judgment alone,” said George Giacoia, MD, of the NICHD’s Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Branch. “However, it’s always better to make treatment decisions on the evidence that comes only from conducting large comparison studies. We now know that lorezapam offers no advantage over diazepam in treating pediatric seizure disorder, and that diazepam is more suited to use by emergency teams.”

In 2007, the National Institutes of Health’s Pediatric Seizure study sought to determine which of two drugs—diazepam or lorazepam—was more effective in treating the life-threatening condition, status epilepticus. This condition can occur without warning. For reasons not fully understood, a child may be gripped by continuous seizures, which, if not stopped within minutes, may lead to brain damage or even death.

Because of the random nature of seizures and their significantly life altering affects, lorezapam is commonly prescribed to treat status epilepticus in children, even though it hasn’t been specifically approved for that use. The results of the Pediatric Seizure study do not support the use of lorezapam instead of diazepam for treating status epilepticus, Dr. Chamberlain said.  Also, because lorezapam needs to be refrigerated and diazepam does not, diazepam is more suited for use by ambulance crews.

A few previous studies indicated that lorazepam might be more effective at ending a seizure and might be less likely than diazepam to depress breathing—a side effect of benzodiazapines, the category of medications that includes both drugs.

In their study, Chamberlain and colleague wrote, “There is no conclusive evidence to support lorazepam as a superior treatment and there is little consensus as to which is the preferred agent.”

The current study was the largest, most comprehensive comparison study of the two treatments for pediatric seizure disorder. Dr. Chamberlain and his colleagues enrolled 310 children at the 11 institutions, between 2008 and 2012. The researchers found that both medications successfully halted seizures in 70 percent of cases, and each had rates of severe respiratory depression of less than 20 percent.

It’s important that “we get the most important scientific information about such medications so there are government approvals for pediatric use,” Chamberlain said. “Pediatric patients are not just small adults.”

(Image: Alamy)

Filed under lorazepam diazepam epilepsy benzodiazepines status epilepticus epileptic seizures neuroscience science

172 notes

Brain capable of making its own version of Valium
The oral drug Valium – also known by its generic name, diazepam – was once popular with doctors in the 1970s as a treatment for seizures brought on by epilepsy. However, the drug, also used to treat anxiety, has fallen out of favor in recent years as it is prone to abuse and often dangerous if taken in high doses.
Now, in light of a recent study, the need for Valium to treat epilepsy may be even further diminished. Researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine have discovered a naturally occurring protein in the brains of mammals that acts like Valium, stopping certain types of seizures from occurring. Researchers hope that if they are able to discover a way to boost this protein naturally, doctors would no longer have a need to prescribe Valium.
The protein, identified as diazepam binding inhibitor (DBI), essentially acts like the brain’s very own brake system, sensing when a seizure is about to occur and arresting the process before it can spiral out of control.
“Our thinking on brain circuits and epilepsy has been that our brains have their own ways to control seizures, and this is why most of us aren’t having seizures every day,” study author John Huguenard, professor of neurology and neurological sciences at Stanford, told FoxNews.com. “But what happens as a seizure starts, a few cells in the brain may get too active, and you get an avalanche of activity that eventually can take up most of the brain circuitry. The brain’s own ‘Valium’ is acting as an anti-avalanche method, checking things when they’re first starting.”
According to Huguenard, the brain has two main groups of nerve cells. The first type of cells – excitatory cells – are responsible for stimulating other cells and sending messages from one area of the brain to another. This messaging process, known as excitation, is responsible for communicating what we see, what we smell, what we do, etc.
The other key type of cells are known as inhibitory cells, which are responsible for keeping the brain circuitry under control. If one area of the brain gets too excited and starts to receive too many signals at once, the inhibitory cells kick into gear and slow the process in order to restore balance.
“In terms of this form of epilepsy we’ve been studying, if a certain group of brain cells can’t communicate well through this inhibitory process, then (the animals) have seizures,” Huguenard said.
The protein DBI is a crucial component of the inhibitory process, as it boosts the actions of an important neurotransmitter called gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Roughly one-fifth of the inhibitory nerve cells in the brain operate by secreting GABA, which binds to receptors located on excitatory cells, rendering them temporarily unable to fire any more electrical signals.  
Without DBI, GABA cannot be enhanced, and the excitatory cells ultimately don’t get the message telling them to calm down. However, up until now, this function of DBI was not well understood by researchers.
To determine exactly how DBI operates in the brains of mammals, Huguenard and his team analyzed a group of bioengineered mice with the DBI gene mutation, meaning their brains were incapable of producing DBI.
“When we tested seizures in these animals and tested communication, we found that (the inhibitory process) was ineffective and that the animals had more seizures,” Huguenard said. “It told us that this gene is producing a product in the brain that is controlling the seizures.”
When they re-introduced the DBI-gene back into the brains of these mice, GABA-induced inhibition was restored and the mice suffered from fewer seizures.
Benzodiazepine drugs, like Valium, work in a very similar way to DBI by also enhancing GABA-induced inhibition. But they often come at a high cost. Many who take these medications long-term develop a physical dependence on the drug, experiencing serious withdrawal symptoms if they cease taking it. Some studies have also found Valium to have an adverse effect on both short-term and long-term cognition.
While the researchers only examined the brains of mice, they are optimistic DBI exists similarly in the brains of humans as well. If the results end up translating to the human mind, Huguenard hopes to find a way to naturally boost DBI in the brain, negating the need for Valium to help control seizures.
“The ultimate goal would be to develop new lines of therapy that would take this general approach – taking the brain’s mechanism for dealing with seizures and making them even more effective,” Huguenard said.
The research was published May 30 in the journal Neuron.

Brain capable of making its own version of Valium

The oral drug Valium – also known by its generic name, diazepam – was once popular with doctors in the 1970s as a treatment for seizures brought on by epilepsy. However, the drug, also used to treat anxiety, has fallen out of favor in recent years as it is prone to abuse and often dangerous if taken in high doses.

Now, in light of a recent study, the need for Valium to treat epilepsy may be even further diminished. Researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine have discovered a naturally occurring protein in the brains of mammals that acts like Valium, stopping certain types of seizures from occurring. Researchers hope that if they are able to discover a way to boost this protein naturally, doctors would no longer have a need to prescribe Valium.

The protein, identified as diazepam binding inhibitor (DBI), essentially acts like the brain’s very own brake system, sensing when a seizure is about to occur and arresting the process before it can spiral out of control.

“Our thinking on brain circuits and epilepsy has been that our brains have their own ways to control seizures, and this is why most of us aren’t having seizures every day,” study author John Huguenard, professor of neurology and neurological sciences at Stanford, told FoxNews.com. “But what happens as a seizure starts, a few cells in the brain may get too active, and you get an avalanche of activity that eventually can take up most of the brain circuitry. The brain’s own ‘Valium’ is acting as an anti-avalanche method, checking things when they’re first starting.”

According to Huguenard, the brain has two main groups of nerve cells. The first type of cells – excitatory cells – are responsible for stimulating other cells and sending messages from one area of the brain to another. This messaging process, known as excitation, is responsible for communicating what we see, what we smell, what we do, etc.

The other key type of cells are known as inhibitory cells, which are responsible for keeping the brain circuitry under control. If one area of the brain gets too excited and starts to receive too many signals at once, the inhibitory cells kick into gear and slow the process in order to restore balance.

“In terms of this form of epilepsy we’ve been studying, if a certain group of brain cells can’t communicate well through this inhibitory process, then (the animals) have seizures,” Huguenard said.

The protein DBI is a crucial component of the inhibitory process, as it boosts the actions of an important neurotransmitter called gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Roughly one-fifth of the inhibitory nerve cells in the brain operate by secreting GABA, which binds to receptors located on excitatory cells, rendering them temporarily unable to fire any more electrical signals.  

Without DBI, GABA cannot be enhanced, and the excitatory cells ultimately don’t get the message telling them to calm down. However, up until now, this function of DBI was not well understood by researchers.

To determine exactly how DBI operates in the brains of mammals, Huguenard and his team analyzed a group of bioengineered mice with the DBI gene mutation, meaning their brains were incapable of producing DBI.

“When we tested seizures in these animals and tested communication, we found that (the inhibitory process) was ineffective and that the animals had more seizures,” Huguenard said. “It told us that this gene is producing a product in the brain that is controlling the seizures.”

When they re-introduced the DBI-gene back into the brains of these mice, GABA-induced inhibition was restored and the mice suffered from fewer seizures.

Benzodiazepine drugs, like Valium, work in a very similar way to DBI by also enhancing GABA-induced inhibition. But they often come at a high cost. Many who take these medications long-term develop a physical dependence on the drug, experiencing serious withdrawal symptoms if they cease taking it. Some studies have also found Valium to have an adverse effect on both short-term and long-term cognition.

While the researchers only examined the brains of mice, they are optimistic DBI exists similarly in the brains of humans as well. If the results end up translating to the human mind, Huguenard hopes to find a way to naturally boost DBI in the brain, negating the need for Valium to help control seizures.

“The ultimate goal would be to develop new lines of therapy that would take this general approach – taking the brain’s mechanism for dealing with seizures and making them even more effective,” Huguenard said.

The research was published May 30 in the journal Neuron.

Filed under mammalian brain diazepam nerve cells receptors neurons neuroscience science

free counters