Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

Posts tagged dementia

39 notes

Path of Plaque Buildup in Brain Shows Promise as Early Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease

The trajectory of amyloid plaque buildup—clumps of abnormal proteins in the brain linked to Alzheimer’s disease—may serve as a more powerful biomarker for early detection of cognitive decline rather than using the total amount to gauge risk, researchers from Penn Medicine’s Department of Radiology suggest in a new study published online July 15 in the Journal of Neurobiology of Aging.

Amyloid plaque that starts to accumulate relatively early in the temporal lobe, compared to other areas and in particular to the frontal lobe, was associated with cognitively declining participants, the study found. “Knowing that certain brain abnormality patterns are associated with cognitive performance could have pivotal importance for the early detection and management of Alzheimer’s,” said senior author Christos Davatzikos, PhD, professor in the Department of Radiology, the Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Today, memory decline and Alzheimer’s—which 5.4 million Americans live with today—is often assessed with a variety of tools, including physical and bio fluid tests and neuroimaging of total amyloid plaque in the brain. Past studies have linked higher amounts of the plaque in dementia-free people with greater risk for developing the disorder. However, it’s more recently been shown that nearly a third of people with plaque on their brains never showed signs of cognitive decline, raising questions about its specific role in the disease.

Now, Dr. Davatzikos and his Penn colleagues, in collaboration with a team led by Susan M. Resnick, PhD, Chief, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience at the National Institute on Aging (NIA), used Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) brain scans from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging’s Imaging Study and discovered a stronger association between memory decline and spatial patterns of amyloid plaque progression than the total amyloid burden.

“It appears to be more about the spatial pattern of this plaque progression, and not so much about the total amount found in brains. We saw a difference in the spatial distribution of plaques among cognitive declining and stable patients whose cognitive function had been measured over a 12-year period. They had similar amounts of amyloid plaque, just in different spots,” Dr. Davatzikos said. “This is important because it potentially answers questions about the variability seen in clinical research among patients presenting plaque. It accumulates in different spatial patterns for different patients, and it’s that pattern growth that may determine whether your memory declines.”

The team, including first author Rachel A. Yotter, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher in the Section for Biomedical Image Analysis, retrospectively analyzed the PET PiB scans of 64 patients from the NIA’s Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging whose average age was 76 years old. For the study, researchers created a unique picture of patients’ brains by combining and analyzing PET images measuring the density and volume of amyloid plaque and their spatial distribution within the brain. The radiotracer PiB allowed investigators to see amyloid temporal changes in deposition.

Those images were then compared to California Verbal Learning Test (CLVT) scores, among other tests, from the participants to determine the longitudinal cognitive decline. The group was then broken up into two subgroups: the most stable and the most declining individuals (26 participants).

Despite lack of significant difference in the total amount of amyloid in the brain, the spatial patterns between the two groups (stable and declining) were different, with the former showing relatively early accumulation in the frontal lobes and the latter in the temporal lobes.   

A particular area of the brain may be affected early or later depending on the amyloid trajectory, according to the authors, which in turn would affect cognitive impairment. Areas affected early with the plaque include the lateral temporal and parietal regions, with sparing of the occipital lobe and motor cortices until later in disease progression.

“This finding has broad implications for our understanding of the relationship between cognitive decline and resistance and amyloid plaque location, as well as the use of amyloid imaging as a biomarker in research and the clinic,” said Dr Davatzikos. “The next step is to investigate more individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and to further investigate the follow-up scans of these individuals via the BLSA study, which might shed further light on its relevance for early detection of Alzheimer’s.”

(Source: uphs.upenn.edu)

Filed under alzheimer's disease dementia cognitive decline amyloid plaques temporal lobe neuroscience science

138 notes

Fighting Alzheimer’s disease with protein origami
The human protein prefoldin can reduce the neuronal toxicity of clumps of amyloid-β proteins that collect in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients
Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive degenerative brain disease most commonly characterized by memory deficits. Loss of memory function, in particular, is known to be caused by neuronal damage arising from the misfolding of protein fragments in the brain. Now, a group of researchers led by Mizuo Maeda of the RIKEN Bioengineering Laboratory, and including researchers from the Laboratory for Proteolytic Neuroscience at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, has found that the human protein prefoldin can change the way these misfolded protein aggregates form and potentially reduce their toxic impact on the brains of Alzheimer’s patients.
The formation of insoluble fibril aggregates of the protein amyloid-β has been identified as a key mechanism responsible for memory loss in Alzheimer’s patients. These fibrils are toxic to neurons, and finding a means of preventing their formation represents a key strategy in the development of a therapy for the disease. Recent studies suggest methods that alter the mechanism of amyloid-β aggregates could offer a promising approach.
Prefoldin is a molecular chaperone involved in preventing the clumping of misfolded proteins and helping misfolded proteins return to their normal shape. The researchers found that amyloid-β molecules incubated with even just a small amount of human prefoldin underwent a change in aggregation behavior—they instead formed into small, soluble oligomer clumps. The observations suggest that human prefoldin interacts with amyloid-β molecules to alter their binding properties.
As in the brain, amyloid-β fibrils also kill neurons in cell culture. Using neurons from the brains of mice, the researchers showed that the amyloid-β oligomers formed in the presence of human prefoldin induced less neuron death than amyloid-β fibrils. Prefoldin expression actually increases in the brains of mice with high levels of amyloid-β, suggesting that the upregulation of prefoldin expression might be a response mechanism used by the brain to protect itself from the toxic effects of amyloid-β fibrils.
Many researchers currently believe that amyloid-β oligomers are themselves a toxin that induces neuronal dysfunction. The present results, however, suggest that certain types of oligomers may in fact be less toxic than other conformations of amyloid-β aggregates. Increasing the expression of human prefoldin in the brain may therefore increase the proportion of less toxic amyloid-β aggregates, presenting a potential means of fighting the disease.
“Our findings may also apply to various other neurological diseases caused by protein misfolding, such as prion disease, Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease,” explains Tamotsu Zako from the research team.

Fighting Alzheimer’s disease with protein origami

The human protein prefoldin can reduce the neuronal toxicity of clumps of amyloid-β proteins that collect in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients

Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive degenerative brain disease most commonly characterized by memory deficits. Loss of memory function, in particular, is known to be caused by neuronal damage arising from the misfolding of protein fragments in the brain. Now, a group of researchers led by Mizuo Maeda of the RIKEN Bioengineering Laboratory, and including researchers from the Laboratory for Proteolytic Neuroscience at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, has found that the human protein prefoldin can change the way these misfolded protein aggregates form and potentially reduce their toxic impact on the brains of Alzheimer’s patients.

The formation of insoluble fibril aggregates of the protein amyloid-β has been identified as a key mechanism responsible for memory loss in Alzheimer’s patients. These fibrils are toxic to neurons, and finding a means of preventing their formation represents a key strategy in the development of a therapy for the disease. Recent studies suggest methods that alter the mechanism of amyloid-β aggregates could offer a promising approach.

Prefoldin is a molecular chaperone involved in preventing the clumping of misfolded proteins and helping misfolded proteins return to their normal shape. The researchers found that amyloid-β molecules incubated with even just a small amount of human prefoldin underwent a change in aggregation behavior—they instead formed into small, soluble oligomer clumps. The observations suggest that human prefoldin interacts with amyloid-β molecules to alter their binding properties.

As in the brain, amyloid-β fibrils also kill neurons in cell culture. Using neurons from the brains of mice, the researchers showed that the amyloid-β oligomers formed in the presence of human prefoldin induced less neuron death than amyloid-β fibrils. Prefoldin expression actually increases in the brains of mice with high levels of amyloid-β, suggesting that the upregulation of prefoldin expression might be a response mechanism used by the brain to protect itself from the toxic effects of amyloid-β fibrils.

Many researchers currently believe that amyloid-β oligomers are themselves a toxin that induces neuronal dysfunction. The present results, however, suggest that certain types of oligomers may in fact be less toxic than other conformations of amyloid-β aggregates. Increasing the expression of human prefoldin in the brain may therefore increase the proportion of less toxic amyloid-β aggregates, presenting a potential means of fighting the disease.

“Our findings may also apply to various other neurological diseases caused by protein misfolding, such as prion disease, Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease,” explains Tamotsu Zako from the research team.

Filed under alzheimer's disease beta amyloid dementia protein misfolding fibrils neuroscience science

88 notes

Researchers Investigate Mechanism of Alzheimer’s Therapy
Researchers at the University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, led by faculty member Donna Wilcock, have recently published a new paper in the Journal of Neuroscience detailing an advance in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
Gammagard™ IVIg is a therapy that has been investigated for treatment of Alzheimer’s. Despite small clinical studies that have reported efficacy of the approach, the mechanism of action is poorly understood.
The UK researchers set out to investigate the mechanism by which the treatment may act in the brain to lower amyloid deposition (amyloid deposits being a key pathology in Alzheimer’s).
To conduct their investigation, researchers introduced IVIg directly into the brains of mice which carry a human gene causing them to develop amyloid plaques. They found that IVIg lowers amyloid deposits in the brains of the mice over the course of seven days. Their data suggest that the modulation of inflammation in the brain by IVIg is a key event that leads to the reduction in amyloid deposition.
The scientists hypothesize that the IVIg acts as an immune modulator, and this immune modulation is responsible for the reductions in amyloid pathology.
The data suggests that modulating the immune response in the brain may help ameliorate the Alzheimer’s pathology. Researchers are currently investigating other ways to produce the same modulation of the immune response because the access of IVIg to the brain when administered peripherally is very limited.

Researchers Investigate Mechanism of Alzheimer’s Therapy

Researchers at the University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, led by faculty member Donna Wilcock, have recently published a new paper in the Journal of Neuroscience detailing an advance in treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.

Gammagard™ IVIg is a therapy that has been investigated for treatment of Alzheimer’s. Despite small clinical studies that have reported efficacy of the approach, the mechanism of action is poorly understood.

The UK researchers set out to investigate the mechanism by which the treatment may act in the brain to lower amyloid deposition (amyloid deposits being a key pathology in Alzheimer’s).

To conduct their investigation, researchers introduced IVIg directly into the brains of mice which carry a human gene causing them to develop amyloid plaques. They found that IVIg lowers amyloid deposits in the brains of the mice over the course of seven days. Their data suggest that the modulation of inflammation in the brain by IVIg is a key event that leads to the reduction in amyloid deposition.

The scientists hypothesize that the IVIg acts as an immune modulator, and this immune modulation is responsible for the reductions in amyloid pathology.

The data suggests that modulating the immune response in the brain may help ameliorate the Alzheimer’s pathology. Researchers are currently investigating other ways to produce the same modulation of the immune response because the access of IVIg to the brain when administered peripherally is very limited.

Filed under alzheimer's disease brain inflammation dementia amyloid deposition neuroscience science

271 notes

To Preserve Memory Into Old Age, Keep Your Brain Active!
A new study from Rush University Medical Center in Chicago claims reading and writing may preserve memory into old age. By keeping your brain active, says study author Robert S. Wilson, PhD, you’re able to slow the rate at which your memory decreases in later years.
This is not the first time researchers have arrived at such a conclusion, of course. Previous studies have also found keeping the brain active by reading, writing, completing crossword puzzles and more can essentially exercise the brain and keep it limber far into old age. One study also concluded that keeping television consumption to a minimal amount may also boost brain power over the years. Wilson’s study was recently published in the journal Neurology.
“Our study suggests that exercising your brain by taking part in activities such as these across a person’s lifetime, from childhood through old age, is important for brain health in old age,” said Wilson in a statement.
For his study, Wilson gathered nearly 300 people around the age of 80. He then gave them tests which were designed to measure both their memory and cognition each year until they passed away at an average age of 89. The same participants also answered questions about their past, such as whether they read books, did any writing, or engaged in any other mentally stimulating activities. The volunteers answered these questions for every part of their life, from childhood to adolescence, middle age and beyond.
When the participants passed away, their brains were then examined at an autopsy as Wilson’s team looked for physical evidence of dementia, such as lesions in the brain, tangles or plaques. After examining the brains of these volunteers and compiling the data from the questionnaires, Wilson’s team found those who had kept their minds active throughout their lives had a slower rate of memory decline than those who did not often participate in mentally challenging activities. Based on the amount of plaques and tangles in the brains, keeping your brain active is responsible for a 15 percent differential in memory decline.
The study also found the rate of memory decline was reduced by 32 percent in people who kept their brains active late in life. Those who were not mentally active had it much worse; their memories declined 48 percent faster than their actively reading and writing peers.
“Based on this, we shouldn’t underestimate the effects of everyday activities, such as reading and writing, on our children, ourselves and our parents or grandparents,” said Wilson.
And this news is hardly surprising. Doctors, teachers and parents have been admonishing children to turn off the television and pick up a book for years. There is no shortage of studies to back up their claims. A 2009 study, for example, found people who keep their brains active saw a 30 to 50 percent decrease in risk of developing memory loss. This study, conducted by doctors at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota observed people between the ages of 70 and 89 with and without diagnosed memory loss.
Those who were likely to read magazines or engage in other social activities were 40 percent less likely to develop memory loss than homebodies who did not read. Furthermore, those who spent less than seven hours a day watching television were 50 percent less likely to develop memory loss than those who planted themselves in front of the tube for long stretches of time.

To Preserve Memory Into Old Age, Keep Your Brain Active!

A new study from Rush University Medical Center in Chicago claims reading and writing may preserve memory into old age. By keeping your brain active, says study author Robert S. Wilson, PhD, you’re able to slow the rate at which your memory decreases in later years.

This is not the first time researchers have arrived at such a conclusion, of course. Previous studies have also found keeping the brain active by reading, writing, completing crossword puzzles and more can essentially exercise the brain and keep it limber far into old age. One study also concluded that keeping television consumption to a minimal amount may also boost brain power over the years. Wilson’s study was recently published in the journal Neurology.

“Our study suggests that exercising your brain by taking part in activities such as these across a person’s lifetime, from childhood through old age, is important for brain health in old age,” said Wilson in a statement.

For his study, Wilson gathered nearly 300 people around the age of 80. He then gave them tests which were designed to measure both their memory and cognition each year until they passed away at an average age of 89. The same participants also answered questions about their past, such as whether they read books, did any writing, or engaged in any other mentally stimulating activities. The volunteers answered these questions for every part of their life, from childhood to adolescence, middle age and beyond.

When the participants passed away, their brains were then examined at an autopsy as Wilson’s team looked for physical evidence of dementia, such as lesions in the brain, tangles or plaques. After examining the brains of these volunteers and compiling the data from the questionnaires, Wilson’s team found those who had kept their minds active throughout their lives had a slower rate of memory decline than those who did not often participate in mentally challenging activities. Based on the amount of plaques and tangles in the brains, keeping your brain active is responsible for a 15 percent differential in memory decline.

The study also found the rate of memory decline was reduced by 32 percent in people who kept their brains active late in life. Those who were not mentally active had it much worse; their memories declined 48 percent faster than their actively reading and writing peers.

“Based on this, we shouldn’t underestimate the effects of everyday activities, such as reading and writing, on our children, ourselves and our parents or grandparents,” said Wilson.

And this news is hardly surprising. Doctors, teachers and parents have been admonishing children to turn off the television and pick up a book for years. There is no shortage of studies to back up their claims. A 2009 study, for example, found people who keep their brains active saw a 30 to 50 percent decrease in risk of developing memory loss. This study, conducted by doctors at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota observed people between the ages of 70 and 89 with and without diagnosed memory loss.

Those who were likely to read magazines or engage in other social activities were 40 percent less likely to develop memory loss than homebodies who did not read. Furthermore, those who spent less than seven hours a day watching television were 50 percent less likely to develop memory loss than those who planted themselves in front of the tube for long stretches of time.

Filed under memory memory loss dementia brain psychology neuroscience science

44 notes

Lack of immune cell receptor impairs clearance of amyloid beta protein from the brain

Identification of a protein that appears to play an important role in the immune system’s removal of amyloid beta (A-beta) protein from the brain could lead to a new treatment strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. The report from researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has been published online in Nature Communications.

"We identified a receptor protein that mediates clearance from the brain of soluble A-beta by cells of the innate immune system," says Joseph El Khoury, MD, of the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases in the MGH Division of Infectious Diseases, co-corresponding author of the report. "We also found that deficiency of this receptor in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease leads to greater A-beta deposition and accelerated death, while upregulating its expression enhanced A-beta clearance from the brain."

The brain’s immune system – which includes cells like microglia, monocytes and macrophages that engulf and remove foreign materials – appears to play a dual role in neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease. At early stages, these cells mount a response against the buildup of A-beta, the primary component of the toxic plaques found in the brains of patients with the devastating neurological disorder. But as the disease progresses and A-beta plaques become larger, not only do these cells lose their ability to take up A-beta, they also release inflammatory chemicals that cause further damage to brain tissue.

In their investigation of factors that may underlie the breakdown of the immune system’s clearance of A-beta, El Khoury’s team with the hypothesis that, in addition to recognizing and binding to the insoluble form of A-beta found in amyloid plaques, the brain’s immune cells might also interact with soluble forms of A-beta that could begin accumulating in the brain before plaques appear. The researchers first examined a group of receptor proteins known to be used by microglia, monocytes and macrophages to interact with insoluble A-beta. Although any role for these proteins in Alzheimer’s disease has not been known, the MGH investigators previously found that their expression in a mouse model of the disease dropped as the animals aged.

After they first identified the involvement of a receptor called Scara1 in the uptake of soluble A-beta by monocytes and macrophages, the researchers then confirmed that Scara1 appears to be the major receptor for recognition and clearance of A-beta by the innate immune system, the body’s first line of defense. In a mouse model of Alzheimer’s, animals that were missing one or both copies of the Scara1 gene died several months earlier than did those with two functioning copies. By the age of 8 months, Alzheimer’s mice with no functioning Scara1 genes had double the A-beta in their brains as did a control group of Alzheimer’s mice, while normal mice had virtually none.

To investigate possible therapeutic application of the role of Scara1 in A-beta clearance, the MGH team treated cultured immune cells with Protollin, a compound that has been used to enhance the immune response to certain vaccines. Application of Protollin to immune cells tripled their expression of Scara1 and also increased levels of a protein that attracts other immune cells. Adding Protollin-stimulated microglia to brain samples from Alzheimer’s mice reduced the size and number of A-beta deposits in the hippocampus, an area particularly damaged by the disease, but that reduction was significantly less when microglia from Scara1-deficient mice were used.

El Khoury notes that previous research showed that Protollin treatment reduced A-beta deposits in Alzheimer’s mice and the current study reveals the probable mechanism behind that finding. “Upregulating Scara1 expression is a promising approach to treating Alzheimer’s disease,” he says. “First we need to duplicate these studies using human cells and identify new classes of molecules that can safely increase Scara1 expression or activity. That could potentially lead to ways of harnessing the immune system to delay the progression of this disease.” El Khoury is an associate professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.

(Source: massgeneral.org)

Filed under alzheimer's disease beta amyloid dementia microglia macrophages protollin neuroscience science

79 notes

A second amyloid may play a role in Alzheimer’s disease

A protein secreted with insulin travels through the bloodstream and accumulates in the brains of individuals with type 2 diabetes and dementia, in the same manner as the amyloid beta (Αβ) plaques that are associated with Alzheimer’s disease, a study by researchers with the UC Davis Alzheimer’s Disease Center has found.

image

The study is the first to identify deposits of the protein, called amylin, in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease, as well as combined deposits of amylin and Aβ plaques, suggesting that amylin is a second amyloid as well as a new biomarker for age-related dementia and Alzheimer’s.

“We’ve known for a long time that diabetes hurts the brain, and there has been a lot of speculation about why that occurs, but there has been no conclusive evidence until now,” said UC Davis Alzheimer’s Disease Center Director Charles DeCarli.

“This research is the first to provide clear evidence that amylin gets into the brain itself and that it forms plaques that are just like the amyloid beta that has been thought to be the cause of Alzheimer’s disease,” DeCarli said. “In fact, the amylin looks like the amyloid beta protein, and they both interact. That’s why we’re calling it the second amyloid of Alzheimer’s disease.”

 ”Amylin deposition in the brain: A second amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease?” is published online today in the Annals of Neurology.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder that increases the risk for cerebrovascular disease and dementia, a risk that develops years before the onset of clinically apparent diabetes. Its incidence is far greater among people who are obese and insulin resistant.

Amylin, or islet amyloid polypeptide, is a hormone produced by the pancreas that circulates in the bloodstream with insulin and plays a critical role in glycemic regulation by slowing gastric emptying, promoting satiety and preventing post-prandial spikes in blood glucose levels. Its deposition in the pancreas is a hallmark of type 2 diabetes.

When over-secreted, some proteins have a higher propensity to stick to one another, forming small aggregates, called oligomers, fibrils and amyloids. These types of proteins are called amyloidogenic and include amylin and Aβ. There are about 28 amyloidogenic proteins, each of which is associated with diseases.                

The study was conducted by examining brain tissue from individuals who fell into three groups: those who had both diabetes and dementia from cerebrovascular or Alzheimer’s disease; those with Alzheimer’s disease without diabetes; and age-matched healthy individuals who served as controls.

The research found numerous amylin deposits in the gray matter of the diabetic patients with dementia, as well as in the walls of the blood vessels in their brains, suggesting amylin influx from blood circulation. Surprisingly, the researchers also found amylin in the brain tissue of individuals with Alzheimer’s who had not been diagnosed with diabetes; they postulate that these individuals may have had undiagnosed insulin resistance. They did not find amylin deposits in the brains of the healthy control subjects.

“We found that the amylin deposits in the brains of people with dementia are both independent of and co-located with the Aβ, which is the suspected cause of Alzheimer’s disease,” said Florin Despa, assistant professor-in-residence in the UC Davis Department of Pharmacology. “It is both in the walls of the blood vessels of the brain and also in areas remote from the blood vessels.

“It is accumulating in the brain and we found signs that amylin is killing neurons similar to Aβ,” he continued. “And that might be the answer to the question of ‘What makes obese and type 2 diabetes patients more prone to developing dementia?’”

The researchers undertook the investigation after Despa and his colleagues found that amylin accumulates in the blood vessels and muscle of the heart. From this evidence, he hypothesized that the same thing might be happening in the brain. To test the hypothesis he received a pilot research grant through the Alzheimer’s Disease Center.

The research was conducted using tissue from the brains of individuals over 65 donated to the UC Davis Alzheimer’s Disease Center: 15 patients with Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes; 14 Alzheimer’s disease patients without diabetes; and 13 healthy controls. A series of tests, including Western blot, immunohistochemistry and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were used to test amylin accumulation in specimens from the temporal cortex.

In contrast with the healthy brains, the brain tissue infiltrated with amylin showed increased interstitial spaces, cavities within the tissue, sponginess, and blood vessels bent around amylin accumulation sites.

Despa said that the finding may offer a therapeutic target for drug development, either by increasing the rate of amylin elimination through the kidneys, or by decreasing its rate of oligomerization and deposition in diabetic patients.

"If we’re smart about the treatment of pre-diabetes, a condition that promotes increased amylin secretion, we might be able to reduce the risk of complications, including Alzheimer’s and dementia,” Despa said.

(Source: ucdmc.ucdavis.edu)

Filed under alzheimer's disease amylin amyloidogenic proteins beta amyloid dementia oligomers type II diabetes neuroscience science

45 notes

Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models Point To A Potential Therapeutic Approach 
Building on research published eight years ago in the journal Chemistry and Biology, Kenneth S. Kosik, Harriman Professor in Neuroscience and co-director of the Neuroscience Research Institute (NRI) at UC Santa Barbara, and his team have now applied their findings to two distinct, well-known mouse models, demonstrating a new potential target in the fight against Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.
The results were published online June 4 as the Paper of the Week in the  Journal of Biological Chemistry. As a Paper of the Week, Kosik’s work is among the top 2 percent of manuscripts the journal reviews in a year. Based on significance and overall importance, between 50 and 100 papers are selected for this honor from the more than 6,600 published each year.
Kosik and his research team focused on tau, a protein normally present in the brain, which can develop into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that, along with plaques containing amyloid-ß protein, characterize Alzheimer’s disease. When tau becomes pathological, many phosphate groups attach to it, causing it to become dysfunctional and intensely phosphorylated, or hyperphosphorylated. Aggregations of hyperphosphorylated tau are also referred to as paired helical filaments.
"What struck me most while working on this project was how so many people I’d never met came to me to share their stories and personal anxieties about Alzheimer’s disease," said Xuemei Zhang, lead co-author and an assistant specialist in the Kosik Lab. "There is no doubt that finding therapeutic treatment is the only way to help this fast-growing population." Israel Hernandez, a postdoctoral scholar of the NRI and UCSB’s Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, is the paper’s other lead co-author.
Treatments for hyperphosphorylated tau, one of the main causes of Alzheimer’s disease, do not exist. Current treatment is restricted to drugs that increase the concentration of neurotransmitters to promote signaling between neurons.
However, this latest research explores the possibility that a small class of molecules called diaminothiazoles can act as inhibitors of kinase enzymes that phosphorylate tau. Kosik’s team studied the toxicity and immunoreactivity of several diaminothiazoles that targeted two key kinases, CDK5/p25 and GSK3ß, in two Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. The investigators found that the compounds can efficiently inhibit the enzymes with hardly any toxic effects in the therapeutic dose range.
Treatment with the lead compound in this study, LDN-193594, dramatically affected the prominent neuronal cell loss that accompanies increased CDK5 activity. Diaminothiazole kinase inhibitors not only reduced tau phosphorylation but also exerted a neuroprotective effect in vivo. In addition to reducing the amount of the paired helical filaments in the mice’s brains, they also restored their learning and memory abilities during a fear-conditioning assay.
According to the authors, the fact that treatment with diaminothiazole kinase inhibitors reduced the phosphorylation of tau provides strong evidence that small molecular kinase inhibitor treatment could slow the progression of tau pathology. “Given the contribution of both CDK5 and GSK3ß to tau phosphorylation,” said Kosik, “effective treatment of tauopathies may require dual kinase targeting.”
Madison Cornwell, a Beckman Scholar with UCSB’s Center for Science and Engineering Partnerships who worked in Kosik’s lab, added: “As a beginning step, we demonstrated that two of these compounds were successful in clearing the brain of tau tangles in a mouse model, but someday inhibitors of these kinases may serve to ameliorate the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease in patients.”

Alzheimer’s Disease Mouse Models Point To A Potential Therapeutic Approach

Building on research published eight years ago in the journal Chemistry and Biology, Kenneth S. Kosik, Harriman Professor in Neuroscience and co-director of the Neuroscience Research Institute (NRI) at UC Santa Barbara, and his team have now applied their findings to two distinct, well-known mouse models, demonstrating a new potential target in the fight against Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.

The results were published online June 4 as the Paper of the Week in the Journal of Biological Chemistry. As a Paper of the Week, Kosik’s work is among the top 2 percent of manuscripts the journal reviews in a year. Based on significance and overall importance, between 50 and 100 papers are selected for this honor from the more than 6,600 published each year.

Kosik and his research team focused on tau, a protein normally present in the brain, which can develop into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that, along with plaques containing amyloid-ß protein, characterize Alzheimer’s disease. When tau becomes pathological, many phosphate groups attach to it, causing it to become dysfunctional and intensely phosphorylated, or hyperphosphorylated. Aggregations of hyperphosphorylated tau are also referred to as paired helical filaments.

"What struck me most while working on this project was how so many people I’d never met came to me to share their stories and personal anxieties about Alzheimer’s disease," said Xuemei Zhang, lead co-author and an assistant specialist in the Kosik Lab. "There is no doubt that finding therapeutic treatment is the only way to help this fast-growing population." Israel Hernandez, a postdoctoral scholar of the NRI and UCSB’s Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, is the paper’s other lead co-author.

Treatments for hyperphosphorylated tau, one of the main causes of Alzheimer’s disease, do not exist. Current treatment is restricted to drugs that increase the concentration of neurotransmitters to promote signaling between neurons.

However, this latest research explores the possibility that a small class of molecules called diaminothiazoles can act as inhibitors of kinase enzymes that phosphorylate tau. Kosik’s team studied the toxicity and immunoreactivity of several diaminothiazoles that targeted two key kinases, CDK5/p25 and GSK3ß, in two Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. The investigators found that the compounds can efficiently inhibit the enzymes with hardly any toxic effects in the therapeutic dose range.

Treatment with the lead compound in this study, LDN-193594, dramatically affected the prominent neuronal cell loss that accompanies increased CDK5 activity. Diaminothiazole kinase inhibitors not only reduced tau phosphorylation but also exerted a neuroprotective effect in vivo. In addition to reducing the amount of the paired helical filaments in the mice’s brains, they also restored their learning and memory abilities during a fear-conditioning assay.

According to the authors, the fact that treatment with diaminothiazole kinase inhibitors reduced the phosphorylation of tau provides strong evidence that small molecular kinase inhibitor treatment could slow the progression of tau pathology. “Given the contribution of both CDK5 and GSK3ß to tau phosphorylation,” said Kosik, “effective treatment of tauopathies may require dual kinase targeting.”

Madison Cornwell, a Beckman Scholar with UCSB’s Center for Science and Engineering Partnerships who worked in Kosik’s lab, added: “As a beginning step, we demonstrated that two of these compounds were successful in clearing the brain of tau tangles in a mouse model, but someday inhibitors of these kinases may serve to ameliorate the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease in patients.”

Filed under alzheimer's disease beta amyloid dementia neurofibrillary tangles medicine neuroscience science

75 notes

Promising Alzheimer’s ‘drug’ halts memory loss
A new class of experimental drug-like small molecules is showing great promise in targeting a brain enzyme to prevent early memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease, according to Northwestern Medicine® research.
Developed in the laboratory of D. Martin Watterson, the molecules halted memory loss and fixed damaged communication among brain cells in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s.
"This is the starting point for the development of a new class of drugs," said Watterson, lead author of a paper on the study and the John G. Searle Professor of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. "It’s possible someday this class of drugs could be given early on to people to arrest certain aspects of Alzheimer’s."
Changes in the brain start to occur ten to 15 years before serious memory problems become apparent in Alzheimer’s.
"This class of drugs could be beneficial when the nerve cells are just beginning to become impaired," said Linda Van Eldik, a senior author of the paper and director of the University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging.
The study is a collaboration between Northwestern’s Feinberg School, Columbia University Medical Center and the University of Kentucky. It will be published June 26 in the journal PLOS ONE.
The novel drug-like molecule, called MW108, reduces the activity of an enzyme that is over-activated during Alzheimer’s and is considered a contributor to brain inflammation and impaired neuron function. Strong communication between neurons in the brain is an essential process for memory formation.
"I’m not aware of any other drug that has this effect on the central nervous system," Watterson said.
"These exciting results provide new hope for developing drugs against an important molecular target in the brain," said Roderick Corriveau, program director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, which helped support the research. "They also provide a promising strategy for identifying small molecule drugs designed to treat Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders."
Watterson and his collaborators have a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) award to further refine the compound so it is metabolically stable and safe for use in humans and develop it to the point of starting a phase 1 clinical trial.
(Image: Jay Vollmar)

Promising Alzheimer’s ‘drug’ halts memory loss

A new class of experimental drug-like small molecules is showing great promise in targeting a brain enzyme to prevent early memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease, according to Northwestern Medicine® research.

Developed in the laboratory of D. Martin Watterson, the molecules halted memory loss and fixed damaged communication among brain cells in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s.

"This is the starting point for the development of a new class of drugs," said Watterson, lead author of a paper on the study and the John G. Searle Professor of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. "It’s possible someday this class of drugs could be given early on to people to arrest certain aspects of Alzheimer’s."

Changes in the brain start to occur ten to 15 years before serious memory problems become apparent in Alzheimer’s.

"This class of drugs could be beneficial when the nerve cells are just beginning to become impaired," said Linda Van Eldik, a senior author of the paper and director of the University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging.

The study is a collaboration between Northwestern’s Feinberg School, Columbia University Medical Center and the University of Kentucky. It will be published June 26 in the journal PLOS ONE.

The novel drug-like molecule, called MW108, reduces the activity of an enzyme that is over-activated during Alzheimer’s and is considered a contributor to brain inflammation and impaired neuron function. Strong communication between neurons in the brain is an essential process for memory formation.

"I’m not aware of any other drug that has this effect on the central nervous system," Watterson said.

"These exciting results provide new hope for developing drugs against an important molecular target in the brain," said Roderick Corriveau, program director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, which helped support the research. "They also provide a promising strategy for identifying small molecule drugs designed to treat Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders."

Watterson and his collaborators have a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) award to further refine the compound so it is metabolically stable and safe for use in humans and develop it to the point of starting a phase 1 clinical trial.

(Image: Jay Vollmar)

Filed under alzheimer's disease dementia memory memory formation brain inflammation neuroscience science

136 notes

Protein Linked to Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Identified
Researchers at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) have demonstrated that a protein called caspase-2 is a key regulator of a signaling pathway that leads to cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. The findings, made in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s, suggest that inhibiting this protein could prevent the neuronal damage and subsequent cognitive decline associated with the disease. The study was published this month in the online journal Nature Communications.
One of the earliest events in Alzheimer’s is disruption of the brain’s synapses (the small gaps across which nerve impulses are passed), which can lead to neuronal death. Although what drives this process has not been clear, studies have indicated that caspace-2 might be involved, according to senior author Michael Shelanski, MD, PhD, the Delafield Professor of Pathology & Cell Biology, chair of the Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, and co-director of the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain at CUMC.
Several years ago, in tissue culture studies of mouse neurons, Dr. Shelanski found that caspace-2 plays a critical role in the death of neurons in the presence of amyloid beta, the protein that accumulates in the neurons of people with Alzheimer’s. Other researchers have shown that caspase-2 also contributes to the maintenance of normal synaptic functions.
Dr. Shelanski and his team hypothesized that aberrant activation of caspase-2 may cause synaptic changes in Alzheimer’s disease. To test this hypothesis, the researchers crossed J20 transgenic mice (a common mouse model of Alzheimer’s) with caspase-2 null mice (mice that lack caspase-2). They compared the animals’ ability to negotiate a radial-arm water maze, a standard test of cognitive ability, with that of regular J20 mice and of normal mice at 4, 9, and 14 months of age.
The results for the three groups of mice were similar at the first two intervals. At 14 months, however, the J20/caspase-2 null mice did significantly better in the water maze test than the J20 mice and similarly to the normal mice. “We showed that removing caspase-2 from J20 mice prevented memory impairment — without significant changes in the level of soluble amyloid beta,” said co-lead author Roger Lefort, PhD, associate research scientist at CUMC.
Analysis of the neurons showed that the J20/caspase-2 null mice had a higher density of dendritic spines than the J20 mice. The more spines a neuron has, the more impulses it can transmit.
“The J20/caspase-2 null mice showed the same dendritic spine density and morphology as the normal mice—as opposed to the deficits in the J20 mice,” said co-lead author Julio Pozueta, PhD. “This strongly suggests that caspase-2 is a critical regulator in the memory decline associated with beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease.”
The researchers further validated the results in studies of rat neurons in tissue culture.
Finally, the researchers found that caspase-2 interacts with RhoA, a critical regulator of the morphology (form and structure) of dendritic spines. “It appears that in normal neurons, caspase-2 and RhoA form an inactive complex outside the dendritic spines,” said Dr. Lefort. “When the complex is exposed to amyloid beta, it breaks apart, activating the two components.” Once activated, caspase-2 and RhoA enter the dendritic spines and contribute to their demise, possibly by interacting with a third molecule, the enzyme ROCK-II.
“This raises the possibility that if you can inhibit one or all of these molecules, especially early in the course of Alzheimer’s, you might be able to protect neurons and slow down the cognitive effects of the disease,” said Dr. Lefort.

Protein Linked to Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer’s Identified

Researchers at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) have demonstrated that a protein called caspase-2 is a key regulator of a signaling pathway that leads to cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. The findings, made in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s, suggest that inhibiting this protein could prevent the neuronal damage and subsequent cognitive decline associated with the disease. The study was published this month in the online journal Nature Communications.

One of the earliest events in Alzheimer’s is disruption of the brain’s synapses (the small gaps across which nerve impulses are passed), which can lead to neuronal death. Although what drives this process has not been clear, studies have indicated that caspace-2 might be involved, according to senior author Michael Shelanski, MD, PhD, the Delafield Professor of Pathology & Cell Biology, chair of the Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, and co-director of the Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain at CUMC.

Several years ago, in tissue culture studies of mouse neurons, Dr. Shelanski found that caspace-2 plays a critical role in the death of neurons in the presence of amyloid beta, the protein that accumulates in the neurons of people with Alzheimer’s. Other researchers have shown that caspase-2 also contributes to the maintenance of normal synaptic functions.

Dr. Shelanski and his team hypothesized that aberrant activation of caspase-2 may cause synaptic changes in Alzheimer’s disease. To test this hypothesis, the researchers crossed J20 transgenic mice (a common mouse model of Alzheimer’s) with caspase-2 null mice (mice that lack caspase-2). They compared the animals’ ability to negotiate a radial-arm water maze, a standard test of cognitive ability, with that of regular J20 mice and of normal mice at 4, 9, and 14 months of age.

The results for the three groups of mice were similar at the first two intervals. At 14 months, however, the J20/caspase-2 null mice did significantly better in the water maze test than the J20 mice and similarly to the normal mice. “We showed that removing caspase-2 from J20 mice prevented memory impairment — without significant changes in the level of soluble amyloid beta,” said co-lead author Roger Lefort, PhD, associate research scientist at CUMC.

Analysis of the neurons showed that the J20/caspase-2 null mice had a higher density of dendritic spines than the J20 mice. The more spines a neuron has, the more impulses it can transmit.

“The J20/caspase-2 null mice showed the same dendritic spine density and morphology as the normal mice—as opposed to the deficits in the J20 mice,” said co-lead author Julio Pozueta, PhD. “This strongly suggests that caspase-2 is a critical regulator in the memory decline associated with beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease.”

The researchers further validated the results in studies of rat neurons in tissue culture.

Finally, the researchers found that caspase-2 interacts with RhoA, a critical regulator of the morphology (form and structure) of dendritic spines. “It appears that in normal neurons, caspase-2 and RhoA form an inactive complex outside the dendritic spines,” said Dr. Lefort. “When the complex is exposed to amyloid beta, it breaks apart, activating the two components.” Once activated, caspase-2 and RhoA enter the dendritic spines and contribute to their demise, possibly by interacting with a third molecule, the enzyme ROCK-II.

“This raises the possibility that if you can inhibit one or all of these molecules, especially early in the course of Alzheimer’s, you might be able to protect neurons and slow down the cognitive effects of the disease,” said Dr. Lefort.

Filed under alzheimer's disease beta amyloid dementia cognitive decline neurotransmission neuroscience science

124 notes

Repairing Bad Memories
It was a Saturday night at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, and the second-floor auditorium held an odd mix of gray-haired, cerebral Upper East Side types and young, scruffy downtown grad students in black denim. Up on the stage, neuroscientist Daniela Schiller, a riveting figure with her long, straight hair and impossibly erect posture, paused briefly from what she was doing to deliver a mini-lecture about memory.
She explained how recent research, including her own, has shown that memories are not unchanging physical traces in the brain. Instead, they are malleable constructs that may be rebuilt every time they are recalled. The research suggests, she said, that doctors (and psychotherapists) might be able to use this knowledge to help patients block the fearful emotions they experience when recalling a traumatic event, converting chronic sources of debilitating anxiety into benign trips down memory lane.
And then Schiller went back to what she had been doing, which was providing a slamming, rhythmic beat on drums and backup vocals for the Amygdaloids, a rock band composed of New York City neuroscientists. During their performance at the institute’s second annual “Heavy Mental Variety Show,” the band blasted out a selection of its greatest hits, including songs about cognition (“Theory of My Mind”), memory (“A Trace”), and psychopathology (“Brainstorm”).
“Just give me a pill,” Schiller crooned at one point, during the chorus of a song called “Memory Pill.” “Wash away my memories …”
The irony is that if research by Schiller and others holds up, you may not even need a pill to strip a memory of its power to frighten or oppress you.
Read more

Repairing Bad Memories

It was a Saturday night at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute, and the second-floor auditorium held an odd mix of gray-haired, cerebral Upper East Side types and young, scruffy downtown grad students in black denim. Up on the stage, neuroscientist Daniela Schiller, a riveting figure with her long, straight hair and impossibly erect posture, paused briefly from what she was doing to deliver a mini-lecture about memory.

She explained how recent research, including her own, has shown that memories are not unchanging physical traces in the brain. Instead, they are malleable constructs that may be rebuilt every time they are recalled. The research suggests, she said, that doctors (and psychotherapists) might be able to use this knowledge to help patients block the fearful emotions they experience when recalling a traumatic event, converting chronic sources of debilitating anxiety into benign trips down memory lane.

And then Schiller went back to what she had been doing, which was providing a slamming, rhythmic beat on drums and backup vocals for the Amygdaloids, a rock band composed of New York City neuroscientists. During their performance at the institute’s second annual “Heavy Mental Variety Show,” the band blasted out a selection of its greatest hits, including songs about cognition (“Theory of My Mind”), memory (“A Trace”), and psychopathology (“Brainstorm”).

“Just give me a pill,” Schiller crooned at one point, during the chorus of a song called “Memory Pill.” “Wash away my memories …”

The irony is that if research by Schiller and others holds up, you may not even need a pill to strip a memory of its power to frighten or oppress you.

Read more

Filed under memory emotional memory reconsolidation dementia neuroscience science

free counters