Posts tagged beta amyloid
Articles and news from the latest research reports.
High blood sugar makes Alzheimer’s plaque more toxic to the brain
High blood-sugar levels, such as those linked with Type 2 diabetes, make beta amyloid protein associated with Alzheimer’s disease dramatically more toxic to cells lining blood vessels in the brain, according to a new Tulane University study published in latest issue of the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.
The study supports growing evidence pointing to glucose levels and vascular damage as contributors to dementia.
“Previously, it was believed that Alzheimer’s disease was due to the accumulation of ‘tangles’ in neurons in the brain from overproduction and reduced removal of beta amyloid protein,” said senior investigator Dr. David Busija, regents professor and chair of pharmacology at Tulane University School of Medicine. “While neuronal involvement is a major factor in Alzheimer’s development, recent evidence indicates damaged cerebral blood vessels compromised by high blood sugar play a role. Even though the links among Type 2 diabetes, brain blood vessels and Alzheimer’s progression are unclear, hyperglycemia appears to play a role.”
Drs. Cristina Carvalho and Paula Moreira from the University of Coimbra in Portugal were co-investigators in the study.
Researchers studied cell cultures taken from the lining of cerebral blood vessels, one from normal rats and another from mice with uncontrolled chronic diabetes. They exposed the cells to beta amyloid and different levels of glucose and later measured their viability. Cells exposed to high glucose or beta amyloid alone showed no changes in viability. However, when exposed to hyperglycemic conditions and beta amyloid, viability decreased by 40 percent. Researchers suspect the damage is due to oxidative stress from the mitochondria of the cell.
The cells from diabetic mice were more susceptible to damage and death to beta amyloid protein − even at normal glucose levels. The increased toxicity of beta amyloid may damage the blood-brain barrier, disrupt normal blood flow to the brain and decrease clearance of beta amyloid protein.
The study’s findings underscore the need to aggressively control blood sugar levels in diabetic individuals, Busija said.
(Source: tulane.edu)
Shorter Sleep Duration and Poorer Sleep Quality Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarker
Poor sleep quality may impact Alzheimer’s disease onset and progression. This is according to a new study led by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who examined the association between sleep variables and a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease in older adults. The researchers found that reports of shorter sleep duration and poorer sleep quality were associated with a greater β-Amyloid burden, a hallmark of the disease. The results are featured online in the October issue of JAMA Neurology.
“Our study found that among older adults, reports of shorter sleep duration and poorer sleep quality were associated with higher levels of β-Amyloid measured by PET scans of the brain,” said Adam Spira, PhD, lead author of the study and an assistant professor with the Bloomberg School’s Department of Mental Health. “These results could have significant public health implications as Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia, and approximately half of older adults have insomnia symptoms.”
Alzheimer’s disease is an irreversible, progressive brain disease that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills. According to the National Institutes of Health, as many as 5.1 million Americans may have the disease, with first symptoms appearing after age 60. Previous studies have linked disturbed sleep to cognitive impairment in older people.
In a cross-sectional study of adults from the neuro-imagining sub-study of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging with an average age of 76, the researchers examined the association between self-reported sleep variables and β-Amyloid deposition. Study participants reported sleep that ranged from more than seven hours to no more than five hours. β-Amyloid deposition was measured by the Pittsburgh compound B tracer and PET (positron emission tomography) scans of the brain. Reports of shorter sleep duration and lower sleep quality were both associated with greater Αβ buildup.
“These findings are important in part because sleep disturbances can be treated in older people. To the degree that poor sleep promotes the development of Alzheimer’s disease, treatments for poor sleep or efforts to maintain healthy sleep patterns may help prevent or slow the progression of Alzheimer disease,” said Spira. He added that the findings cannot demonstrate a causal link between poor sleep and Alzheimer’s disease, and that longitudinal studies with objective sleep measures are needed to further examine whether poor sleep contributes to or accelerates Alzheimer’s disease.
(Source: jhsph.edu)
Cell auto-cleaning mechanism mediates the formation of plaques in Alzheimer’s
Autophagy, a key cellular auto-cleaning mechanism, mediates the formation of amyloid beta plaques, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. It might be a potential drug target for the treatment of the disease, concludes new research from the RIKEN Brain Science Institute in Japan. The study sheds light on the metabolism of amyloid beta, and its role in neurodegeneration and memory loss.
In a study published today in the journal Cell Reports, Drs. Per Nilsson, Takaomi Saido and their team show for the first time using transgenic mice that a lack of autophagy in neurons prevents the secretion of amyloid beta and the formation of amyloid beta plaques in the brain. The study also reveals that an accumulation of amyloid beta inside neurons is toxic for the cells.
Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia, affects nearly 36 million people worldwide, and this number is set to double over the next 20 years. However, the causes of the disease are not well understood and no disease-modifying treatment is available today.
Patients with Alzheimer’s disease have elevated levels of the peptide amyloid beta in their brain and amyloid beta plaques form outside their neurons. This accumulation of amyloid beta causes the neurons to die, but until now the underlying mechanism remained a mystery. And whether the elevated levels of the peptide inside or outside the cells are to blame was unknown.
Autophagy is a cellular cleaning mechanism that normally clears any protein aggregates or other ‘trash’ within the cells, but that is somewhat disturbed in Alzheimer’s patients.
To investigate the role of autophagy in amyloid beta metabolism, Nilsson et al. deleted an important gene for autophagy, Atg7, in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Contrary to what they were expecting, their results showed that a complete lack of autophagy within neurons prevents the formation of amyloid beta plaque around/outside the cells. Instead, the peptide accumulates inside the neurons, where it causes neuronal death, which in turn leads to memory loss.
“Our study explains how amyloid beta is secreted from the neurons, via autophagy, which wasn’t well understood,” comments Dr Nilsson. “To control amyloid beta metabolism including its secretion is a key to control the disease. Autophagy might therefore be a potential drug target for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease,” he adds.
Alzheimer’s progression tracked prior to dementia
For years, scientists have attempted to understand how Alzheimer’s disease harms the brain before memory loss and dementia are clinically detectable. Most researchers think this preclinical stage, which can last a decade or more before symptoms appear, is the critical phase when the disease might be controlled or stopped, possibly preventing the failure of memory and thinking abilities in the first place.
Important progress in this effort is reported in October in Lancet Neurology. Scientists at the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, working in collaboration with investigators at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands, helped to validate a proposed new system for identifying and classifying individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease.
Their findings indicate that preclinical Alzheimer’s disease can be detected during a person’s life, is common in cognitively normal elderly people and is associated with future mental decline and mortality. According to the scientists, this suggests that preclinical Alzheimer’s disease could be an important target for therapeutic intervention.
A panel of Alzheimer’s experts, convened by the National Institute on Aging in association with the Alzheimer’s Association, proposed the classification system two years ago. It is based on earlier efforts to define and track biomarker changes during preclinical disease.
According to the Washington University researchers, the new findings offer reason for encouragement, showing, for example, that the system can help predict which cognitively normal individuals will develop symptoms of Alzheimer’s and how rapidly their brain function will decline. But they also highlight additional questions that must be answered before the classification system can be adapted for use in clinical care.
“For new treatments, knowing where individuals are on the path to Alzheimer’s dementia will help us improve the design and assessment of clinical trials,” said senior author Anne Fagan, PhD, research professor of neurology. “There are many steps left before we can apply this system in the clinic, including standardizing how we gather and assess data in individuals, and determining which of our indicators of preclinical disease are the most accurate. But the research data are compelling and very encouraging.”
The classification system divides preclinical Alzheimer’s into three stages:
- Stage 1: Levels of amyloid beta, a protein fragment produced by the brain, begin to fall in the spinal fluid. This indicates that the substance is beginning to form plaques in the brain.
- Stage 2: Levels of tau protein start to rise in the spinal fluid, indicating that brain cells are beginning to die. Amyloid beta levels are still abnormal and may continue to fall.
- Stage 3: In the presence of abnormal amyloid and tau biomarker levels, subtle cognitive changes can be detected by neuropsychological testing. By themselves, these changes cannot establish a clinical diagnosis of dementia.
The researchers applied these criteria to research participants studied from 1998 through 2011 at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center. The center annually collects extensive cognitive, biomarker and other health data on normal and cognitively impaired volunteers for use in Alzheimer’s studies.
The scientists analyzed information on 311 individuals age 65 or older who were cognitively normal when first evaluated. Each participant was evaluated annually at the center at least twice; the participant in this study with the most data had been followed for 15 years.
At the initial testing, 41 percent of the participants had no indicators of Alzheimer’s disease (stage 0); 15 percent were in stage 1 of preclinical disease; 12 percent were in stage 2; and 4 percent were in stage 3. The remaining participants were classified as having cognitive impairments caused by conditions other than Alzheimer’s (23 percent) or did not meet any of the proposed criteria (5 percent).
“A total of 31 percent of our participants had preclinical disease,” said Fagan. “This percentage matches findings from autopsy studies of the brains of older individuals, which have shown that about 30 percent of people who were cognitively normal had preclinical Alzheimer’s pathology in their brain.”
Scientists believe the rate of cognitive decline increases as people move through the stages of preclinical Alzheimer’s. The new data support this idea. Five years after their initial evaluation, 11 percent of the stage 1 group, 26 percent of the stage 2 group, and 52 percent of the stage 3 group had been diagnosed with symptomatic Alzheimer’s.
Individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease were six times more likely to die over the next decade than older adults without preclinical Alzheimer’s disease, but researchers don’t know why.
“Risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease might also be associated with other life-threatening illnesses,” Fagan said. “It’s also possible that the presence of Alzheimer’s hampers the diagnosis and treatment of other conditions or contributes to health problems elsewhere in the body. We don’t have enough data yet to say, but it’s an issue we’re continuing to investigate.”
(Source: news.wustl.edu)
Versatile proteins could be new target for Alzheimer’s drugs
NIH-funded discovery began with asking how the brain learns to see
A class of proteins that controls visual system development in the young brain also appears to affect vulnerability to Alzheimer’s disease in the aging brain. The proteins, which are found in humans and mice, join a limited roster of molecules that scientists are studying in hopes of finding an effective drug to slow the disease process.
Image: PirB (red) is heavily concentrated on the surface of growing nerve cells. Courtesy of Dr. Carla Shatz, Stanford.
"People are just beginning to look at what these proteins do in the brain. While more research is needed, these proteins may be a brand new target for Alzheimer’s drugs," said Carla Shatz, Ph.D., the study’s lead investigator. Dr. Shatz is a professor of biology and neurobiology at Stanford University in California, and the director of Stanford’s interdisciplinary biosciences program, BioX.
She and her colleagues report that LilrB2 (pronounced “leer-bee-2”) in humans and PirB (“peer-bee”) in mice can physically partner with beta-amyloid, a protein fragment that accumulates in the brain during Alzheimer’s disease. This in turn triggers a harmful chain reaction in brain cells. In a mouse model of Alzheimer’s, depleting PirB in the brain prevented the chain reaction and reduced memory loss.
The research was funded in part by the National Eye Institute, the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), all part of the National Institutes of Health. It is reported in the Sept. 20 issue of Science.
"These findings provide valuable insight into Alzheimer’s, a complex disorder involving the abnormal build-up of proteins, inflammation and a host of other cellular changes," said Neil Buckholtz, Ph.D., director of the neuroscience division at NIA. "Our understanding of the various proteins involved, and how these proteins interact with each other, may one day result in effective interventions that delay, treat or even prevent this dreaded disease."
Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia in older adults, and affects as many as 5 million Americans. Large clumps—or plaques—of beta-amyloid and other proteins accumulate in the brain during Alzheimer’s, but many researchers believe the disease process starts long before the plaques appear. Even in the absence of plaques, beta-amyloid has been shown to cause damage to brain cells and the delicate connections between them.
Dr. Shatz’s discovery took a unique path. She is a renowned neuroscientist, but Alzheimer’s disease is not her focus area. For decades, she has studied plasticity—the brain’s capacity to learn and adapt—focusing mostly on the visual system.
"Dr. Shatz has always been a leader in the field of plasticity, and now she’s taken yet another innovative step—giving us new insights into the abnormal plasticity that occurs in Alzheimer’s disease," said Michael Steinmetz, Ph.D., a program director at NEI. "These findings rest squarely on basic research into the development of the visual system." NEI has funded Dr. Shatz for more than 35 years.
During development, the eyes compete to connect within a limited territory of the brain—a process known as ocular dominance plasticity. The competition takes place during a limited time in early life. If visual experience through one eye is impaired during that time—for example, by a congenital cataract (present from birth)—it can permanently lose territory to the other eye.
"Ocular dominance is a classic example of how a brain circuit can change with experience," Dr. Shatz said. "We’ve been trying to understand it at a molecular level for a long time."
Her search eventually led to PirB, a protein on the surface of nerve cells in the mouse brain. She discovered that mice without the gene for PirB have an increase in ocular dominance plasticity. In adulthood, when the visual parts of their brains should be mature, the connections there are still flexible. This established PirB as a “brake on plasticity” in the healthy brain, Dr. Shatz said.
It wasn’t long before she began to wonder if PirB might also put a brake on plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease. In the current study, she pursued that question with Taeho Kim, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in her lab, and Christopher M. William, M.D., Ph.D., a neuropathology fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. Bradley Hyman, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of neurology at Mass General, was a collaborator on the project.
First, the team repeated the genetic experiment that Dr. Shatz had done in normal mice—but this time, they deleted the PirB gene in the Alzheimer’s mice. By about nine months of age, these mice typically develop learning and memory problems. But that didn’t happen in the absence of PirB.
Next, the researchers began thinking about how PirB might fit into the Alzheimer’s disease process, and particularly how it might interact with beta-amyloid. Dr. Kim theorized that since PirB resides on the surface of nerve cells, it might act as a binding site—or receptor—for beta-amyloid. Indeed, he found that PirB binds tightly to beta-amyloid, especially to tiny clumps of it that are believed to ultimately grow into plaques.
Beta-amyloid is known to weaken synapses—the connections between nerve cells. The researchers found that PirB appears to be an accomplice in this process. Without PirB, synapses in the mouse brain were resistant to the effects of beta-amyloid. Other experiments showed that binding between PirB and beta-amyloid can trigger a cascade of harmful reactions that can lead to the breakdown of synapses.
Although PirB is a mouse protein, humans have a closely related protein called LilrB2. The researchers found that this protein also binds tightly to beta-amyloid. By examining brain tissue from people with Alzheimer’s disease, they also found evidence that LilrB2 may trigger the same harmful reactions that PirB can trigger in the mouse brain.
"These are novel results, and direct interaction between beta-amyloid and PirB-related proteins opens up welcome avenues for investigating new drug targets for Alzheimer’s disease," said Roderick Corriveau, Ph.D., a program director at NINDS.
Dr. Shatz said she hopes to interest other researchers to work on developing drugs to block PirB and LilrB2. Currently, no drugs treat the underlying causes of Alzheimer’s disease. Most of the interventions that have reached clinical testing are designed to clear away beta-amyloid. To date, only two other beta-amyloid receptors (PrP-C and EphB2) have been found and are being pursued as drug targets.
(Source: nei.nih.gov)
Alzheimer’s: newly identified protein pathology impairs RNA splicing
Researchers at Emory University School of Medicine’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center have identified a previously unrecognized type of pathology in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
These tangle-like structures appear at early stages of Alzheimer’s and are not found in other neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease.
What makes these tangles distinct is that they sequester proteins involved in RNA splicing, the process by which instructional messages from genes are cut and pasted together. The researchers show that the appearance of these tangles is linked to widespread changes in RNA splicing in Alzheimer’s brains compared to healthy brains.
The finding could change scientists’ understanding of how the disease develops and progresses, by explaining how genes that have been linked to Alzheimer’s contribute their effects, and could lead to new biomarkers, diagnostic approaches, and therapies.
The results are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Early Edition.
"We were very surprised to find alterations in proteins that are responsible for RNA splicing in Alzheimer’s, which could have major implications for the disease mechanism," says Allan Levey, MD, PhD, chair of neurology at Emory University School of Medicine and director of the Emory ADRC.
"This is a brand new arena," says James Lah, MD, PhD, associate professor of neurology at Emory University School of Medicine and director of the Cognitive Neurology program. "Many Alzheimer’s investigators have looked at how the disease affects alternative splicing of individual genes. Our results suggest a global distortion of RNA processing is taking place."
This research was led by Drs. Levey, Lah, and Junmin Peng, PhD, who was previously associate professor of genetics at Emory and is now a faculty member at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital. They were aided by collaborators at University of Kentucky, Rush University, and University of Washington as well as colleagues at Emory.
Accumulations of plaques and tangles in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease were first observed more than a century ago. Investigating the proteins in these pathological structures has been central to the study of the disease.
Most experimental treatments for Alzheimer’s have aimed at curbing beta-amyloid, an apparently toxic protein fragment that is the dominant component of amyloid plaques. Other approaches target the abnormal accumulation of the protein tau in neurofibrillary tangles. Yet the development of Alzheimer’s is not solely explained by amyloid and tau pathologies, Lah says.
"Two individuals may harbor similar amounts of amyloid plaques and tau tangles in their brains, but one may be completely healthy while the other may have severe memory loss and dementia," he says.
These discrepancies led Emory investigators to take a “back to basics” proteomics approach, cataloguing the proteins that make up insoluble deposits in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients.
"The Alzheimer’s field has been very focused on amyloid and tau, and we wanted to use today’s proteomics technologies to take a comprehensive, unbiased approach," Levey says.
The team identified 36 proteins that were much more abundant in the detergent-resistant deposits in brain tissue from Alzheimer’s patients. This list included the usual suspects: tau and beta-amyloid. Also on the list were several “U1 snRNP” proteins, which are involved in RNA splicing.
These U1 proteins are normally seen in the nucleus of normal cells, but in Alzheimer’s brains they accumulated in tangle-like structures. Accumulation of insoluble U1 protein was seen in samples from patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor stage to Alzheimer’s, but the U1 pathology was not seen in any other brain diseases that were examined.
According to Chad Hales, MD, PhD, one of the study’s lead authors, “U1 aggregation is occurring early in the disease, and U1 tangles can be seen independently of tau pathology. In some cases, we see accumulation of insoluble U1 proteins before the appearance of insoluble tau, suggesting that it is a very early event.”
For most genes, after RNA is read out from the DNA (transcription), some of the RNA must be spliced out. When brain cells accumulate clumps of U1 proteins, that could mean the process of splicing is impaired. To test this, the Emory team examined RNA from the brains of Alzheimer’s patients. In comparison to RNA from healthy brains, more of the RNA from Alzheimer’s brain samples was unspliced.
The finding could explain how many genes that have been linked to Alzheimer’s are having their effects. In cells, U1 snRNP plays multiple roles in processing RNA including the process of alternative splicing, by which one gene can make instructions for two or more proteins.
"U1 dysfunction might produce changes in RNA processing affecting many genes or specific changes affecting a few key genes that are important in Alzheimer’s," Lah says. "Understanding the disruption of such a fundamental process will almost certainly identify new ways to understand Alzheimer’s and new approaches to treating patients."
Brain network decay detected in early Alzheimer’s
In patients with early Alzheimer’s disease, disruptions in brain networks emerge about the same time as chemical markers of the disease appear in the spinal fluid, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have shown.
While two chemical markers in the spinal fluid are regarded as reliable indicators of early disease, the new study, published in JAMA Neurology, is among the first to show that scans of brain networks may be an equally effective and less invasive way to detect early disease.
“Tracking damage to these brain networks may also help us formulate a more detailed understanding of what happens to the brain before the onset of dementia,” said senior author Beau Ances, MD, PhD, associate professor of neurology and of biomedical engineering.
Diagnosing Alzheimer’s early is a top priority for physicians, many of whom believe that treating patients long before dementia starts greatly improves the chances of success.
Ances and his colleagues studied 207 older but cognitively normal research volunteers at the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at Washington University. Over several years, spinal fluids from the volunteers were sampled multiple times and analyzed for two markers of early Alzheimer’s: changes in amyloid beta, the principal ingredient of Alzheimer’s brain plaques, and in tau protein, a structural component of nerve cells.
The volunteers were also scanned repeatedly using a technique called resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This scan tracks the rise and fall of blood flow in different brain regions as patients rest in the scanner. Scientists use the resulting data to assess the integrity of the default mode network, a set of connections between different brain regions that becomes active when the mind is at rest.
Earlier studies by Ances and other researchers have shown that Alzheimer’s damages connections in the default mode network and other brain networks.
The new study revealed that this damage became detectable at about the same time that amyloid beta levels began to fall and tau levels started to rise in spinal fluid. The part of the default mode network most harmed by the onset of Alzheimer’s disease was the connection between two brain areas associated with memory, the posterior cingulate and medial temporal regions.
The researchers are continuing to study the connections between brain network damage and the progress of early Alzheimer’s disease in normal volunteers and in patients in the early stages of Alzheimer’s-associated dementia.
(Source: news.wustl.edu)
New clues illuminate Alzheimer’s roots
Scientists at Rice University and the University of Miami have figured out how synthetic molecules designed at Rice latch onto the amyloid peptide fibrils thought to be responsible for Alzheimer’s disease. Their discovery could point the way toward therapies to halt or even reverse the insidious disease.
The metallic dipyridophenazine ruthenium molecules strongly bind to pockets created when fibrils form from misfolded proteins that cells fail to destroy. When excited under a spectroscope, the molecules luminesce, which indicates the presence of the fibrils. That much was known by Rice researchers, but until now the process was a mystery.
By combining their talents in biophysics (at Rice) and computer simulation (at Miami), researchers pinpointed four such pockets along the fibril where the hydrophobic (water-averse) molecules can bind. They believe their work will help chemists design molecules to keep the fibrils from forming the plaques found in Alzheimer’s patients.
The teams led by Rice chemist Angel Martí and Miami chemist Rajeev Prabhakar reported their results in the Journal of the American Chemical Society this month.
Two years ago, Martí and Nathan Cook, a graduate student in his lab and lead author of the new paper, combined ruthenium complexes with solutions containing the spaghetti-like amyloid fibrils. The complexes don’t luminesce by themselves, but when they link to an amyloid fibril, they can be triggered by light at one wavelength to glow at another; this helps the researchers “see” the fibrils.
This ability to track amyloids was a great step forward, but left open the question of why the complexes latched onto the fibrils at all, Cook said.
“We had no way to figure it out because our experimental techniques can’t identify binding sites,” he said. “The standard (used to analyze proteins) is to crystallize your material and use X-rays to determine where everything is positioned. The problem with amyloid beta is the fibrils are not uniform, and you can’t crystallize them. All you would get is an amorphous lump.”
But a door opened when Prabhakar, a theoretical and computational chemist who specializes in amyloids, contacted Martí and suggested a collaboration. “We both knew the other was working with amyloid betas,” Martí said. “We were able to figure out how many amyloid beta monomers (molecules that can bind with each other) had to come together to form fibrils, while he modeled the interactions. When we brought all the data together, we had a perfect match.”
“Basically, we learned from the model that we need two monomers to form a binding site,” Marti said. “The cleft where the ruthenium complex binds is completely hydrophobic, the same as the complex. Neither wants to be exposed to water, so when they find each other, they don’t have a choice but to come together. It turns out that’s exactly what needs to happen to turn on the photoluminescent response of the compound.”
Martí said testing various concentrations of monomers with ruthenium complexes helped them determine that a little more than two monomers, on average, was sufficient to get the “light switch” effect. Prabhakar’s analysis found four specific locations along the aggregating monomers where the ruthenium complexes could bind: two at the ends where the monomers tend to bind to each other, and two in the middle.
“It was a complicated system to model and we tried hard, using a variety of computational techniques,” Prabhakar said. “In the end, we were amazed to find our results in perfect agreement with the experiments performed in the Martí lab.”
The researchers called the end locations “A and B,” and the middle clefts “C and D.” The hydrophobic A and B sites exist only at the edges of the fibrils, which limits their exposure to the complexes, Martí said. “But there are lots of C and D sites,” he said. “That explains why the ruthenium complexes don’t inhibit the aggregation of fibrils. It seems the system prefers to bind another monomer, rather than a ruthenium complex, at the ends.
“But now that we understand the mechanism, we can design more hydrophobic complexes that could bind strongly to the ends and prevent further elongation of the fibril,” he said.
“There’s a whole variety of ways to tweak this that could potentially disrupt a binding pocket,” Cook said.
More challenges lie beyond the new discovery, he said. New research indicates toxic oligomers may be catalyzed by the formation of amyloid fibrils. “We might be able to prevent the formation of these oligomeric species by binding ruthenium complexes to the surface, which would completely change the surface chemistry of the fibrils,” Martí said. “These are the things we are really interested in doing right now.”
Fighting Alzheimer’s disease with protein origami
The human protein prefoldin can reduce the neuronal toxicity of clumps of amyloid-β proteins that collect in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients
Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive degenerative brain disease most commonly characterized by memory deficits. Loss of memory function, in particular, is known to be caused by neuronal damage arising from the misfolding of protein fragments in the brain. Now, a group of researchers led by Mizuo Maeda of the RIKEN Bioengineering Laboratory, and including researchers from the Laboratory for Proteolytic Neuroscience at the RIKEN Brain Science Institute, has found that the human protein prefoldin can change the way these misfolded protein aggregates form and potentially reduce their toxic impact on the brains of Alzheimer’s patients.
The formation of insoluble fibril aggregates of the protein amyloid-β has been identified as a key mechanism responsible for memory loss in Alzheimer’s patients. These fibrils are toxic to neurons, and finding a means of preventing their formation represents a key strategy in the development of a therapy for the disease. Recent studies suggest methods that alter the mechanism of amyloid-β aggregates could offer a promising approach.
Prefoldin is a molecular chaperone involved in preventing the clumping of misfolded proteins and helping misfolded proteins return to their normal shape. The researchers found that amyloid-β molecules incubated with even just a small amount of human prefoldin underwent a change in aggregation behavior—they instead formed into small, soluble oligomer clumps. The observations suggest that human prefoldin interacts with amyloid-β molecules to alter their binding properties.
As in the brain, amyloid-β fibrils also kill neurons in cell culture. Using neurons from the brains of mice, the researchers showed that the amyloid-β oligomers formed in the presence of human prefoldin induced less neuron death than amyloid-β fibrils. Prefoldin expression actually increases in the brains of mice with high levels of amyloid-β, suggesting that the upregulation of prefoldin expression might be a response mechanism used by the brain to protect itself from the toxic effects of amyloid-β fibrils.
Many researchers currently believe that amyloid-β oligomers are themselves a toxin that induces neuronal dysfunction. The present results, however, suggest that certain types of oligomers may in fact be less toxic than other conformations of amyloid-β aggregates. Increasing the expression of human prefoldin in the brain may therefore increase the proportion of less toxic amyloid-β aggregates, presenting a potential means of fighting the disease.
“Our findings may also apply to various other neurological diseases caused by protein misfolding, such as prion disease, Huntington’s disease and Parkinson’s disease,” explains Tamotsu Zako from the research team.
Lack of immune cell receptor impairs clearance of amyloid beta protein from the brain
Identification of a protein that appears to play an important role in the immune system’s removal of amyloid beta (A-beta) protein from the brain could lead to a new treatment strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. The report from researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has been published online in Nature Communications.
"We identified a receptor protein that mediates clearance from the brain of soluble A-beta by cells of the innate immune system," says Joseph El Khoury, MD, of the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases in the MGH Division of Infectious Diseases, co-corresponding author of the report. "We also found that deficiency of this receptor in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease leads to greater A-beta deposition and accelerated death, while upregulating its expression enhanced A-beta clearance from the brain."
The brain’s immune system – which includes cells like microglia, monocytes and macrophages that engulf and remove foreign materials – appears to play a dual role in neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease. At early stages, these cells mount a response against the buildup of A-beta, the primary component of the toxic plaques found in the brains of patients with the devastating neurological disorder. But as the disease progresses and A-beta plaques become larger, not only do these cells lose their ability to take up A-beta, they also release inflammatory chemicals that cause further damage to brain tissue.
In their investigation of factors that may underlie the breakdown of the immune system’s clearance of A-beta, El Khoury’s team with the hypothesis that, in addition to recognizing and binding to the insoluble form of A-beta found in amyloid plaques, the brain’s immune cells might also interact with soluble forms of A-beta that could begin accumulating in the brain before plaques appear. The researchers first examined a group of receptor proteins known to be used by microglia, monocytes and macrophages to interact with insoluble A-beta. Although any role for these proteins in Alzheimer’s disease has not been known, the MGH investigators previously found that their expression in a mouse model of the disease dropped as the animals aged.
After they first identified the involvement of a receptor called Scara1 in the uptake of soluble A-beta by monocytes and macrophages, the researchers then confirmed that Scara1 appears to be the major receptor for recognition and clearance of A-beta by the innate immune system, the body’s first line of defense. In a mouse model of Alzheimer’s, animals that were missing one or both copies of the Scara1 gene died several months earlier than did those with two functioning copies. By the age of 8 months, Alzheimer’s mice with no functioning Scara1 genes had double the A-beta in their brains as did a control group of Alzheimer’s mice, while normal mice had virtually none.
To investigate possible therapeutic application of the role of Scara1 in A-beta clearance, the MGH team treated cultured immune cells with Protollin, a compound that has been used to enhance the immune response to certain vaccines. Application of Protollin to immune cells tripled their expression of Scara1 and also increased levels of a protein that attracts other immune cells. Adding Protollin-stimulated microglia to brain samples from Alzheimer’s mice reduced the size and number of A-beta deposits in the hippocampus, an area particularly damaged by the disease, but that reduction was significantly less when microglia from Scara1-deficient mice were used.
El Khoury notes that previous research showed that Protollin treatment reduced A-beta deposits in Alzheimer’s mice and the current study reveals the probable mechanism behind that finding. “Upregulating Scara1 expression is a promising approach to treating Alzheimer’s disease,” he says. “First we need to duplicate these studies using human cells and identify new classes of molecules that can safely increase Scara1 expression or activity. That could potentially lead to ways of harnessing the immune system to delay the progression of this disease.” El Khoury is an associate professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.
(Source: massgeneral.org)