Posts tagged Foxp2
Articles and news from the latest research reports.
Neuroscientists identify key role of language gene
Neuroscientists have found that a gene mutation that arose more than half a million years ago may be key to humans’ unique ability to produce and understand speech.
Researchers from MIT and several European universities have shown that the human version of a gene called Foxp2 makes it easier to transform new experiences into routine procedures. When they engineered mice to express humanized Foxp2, the mice learned to run a maze much more quickly than normal mice.
The findings suggest that Foxp2 may help humans with a key component of learning language — transforming experiences, such as hearing the word “glass” when we are shown a glass of water, into a nearly automatic association of that word with objects that look and function like glasses, says Ann Graybiel, an MIT Institute Professor, member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and a senior author of the study.
“This really is an important brick in the wall saying that the form of the gene that allowed us to speak may have something to do with a special kind of learning, which takes us from having to make conscious associations in order to act to a nearly automatic-pilot way of acting based on the cues around us,” Graybiel says.
Wolfgang Enard, a professor of anthropology and human genetics at Ludwig-Maximilians University in Germany, is also a senior author of the study, which appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week. The paper’s lead authors are Christiane Schreiweis, a former visiting graduate student at MIT, and Ulrich Bornschein of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany.
All animal species communicate with each other, but humans have a unique ability to generate and comprehend language. Foxp2 is one of several genes that scientists believe may have contributed to the development of these linguistic skills. The gene was first identified in a group of family members who had severe difficulties in speaking and understanding speech, and who were found to carry a mutated version of the Foxp2 gene.
In 2009, Svante Pääbo, director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, and his team engineered mice to express the human form of the Foxp2 gene, which encodes a protein that differs from the mouse version by only two amino acids. His team found that these mice had longer dendrites — the slender extensions that neurons use to communicate with each other — in the striatum, a part of the brain implicated in habit formation. They were also better at forming new synapses, or connections between neurons.
Pääbo, who is also an author of the new PNAS paper, and Enard enlisted Graybiel, an expert in the striatum, to help study the behavioral effects of replacing Foxp2. They found that the mice with humanized Foxp2 were better at learning to run a T-shaped maze, in which the mice must decide whether to turn left or right at a T-shaped junction, based on the texture of the maze floor, to earn a food reward.
The first phase of this type of learning requires using declarative memory, or memory for events and places. Over time, these memory cues become embedded as habits and are encoded through procedural memory — the type of memory necessary for routine tasks, such as driving to work every day or hitting a tennis forehand after thousands of practice strokes.
Using another type of maze called a cross-maze, Schreiweis and her MIT colleagues were able to test the mice’s ability in each of type of memory alone, as well as the interaction of the two types. They found that the mice with humanized Foxp2 performed the same as normal mice when just one type of memory was needed, but their performance was superior when the learning task required them to convert declarative memories into habitual routines. The key finding was therefore that the humanized Foxp2 gene makes it easier to turn mindful actions into behavioral routines.
The protein produced by Foxp2 is a transcription factor, meaning that it turns other genes on and off. In this study, the researchers found that Foxp2 appears to turn on genes involved in the regulation of synaptic connections between neurons. They also found enhanced dopamine activity in a part of the striatum that is involved in forming procedures. In addition, the neurons of some striatal regions could be turned off for longer periods in response to prolonged activation — a phenomenon known as long-term depression, which is necessary for learning new tasks and forming memories.
Together, these changes help to “tune” the brain differently to adapt it to speech and language acquisition, the researchers believe. They are now further investigating how Foxp2 may interact with other genes to produce its effects on learning and language.
This study “provides new ways to think about the evolution of Foxp2 function in the brain,” says Genevieve Konopka, an assistant professor of neuroscience at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center who was not involved in the research. “It suggests that human Foxp2 facilitates learning that has been conducive for the emergence of speech and language in humans. The observed differences in dopamine levels and long-term depression in a region-specific manner are also striking and begin to provide mechanistic details of how the molecular evolution of one gene might lead to alterations in behavior.”
Genetic Defect Keeps Verbal Cues From Hitting the Mark
A genetic defect that profoundly affects speech in humans also disrupts the ability of songbirds to sing effective courtship tunes. This defect in a gene called FoxP2 renders the brain circuitry insensitive to feel-good chemicals that serve as a reward for speaking the correct syllable or hitting the right note, a recent study shows.
The research, which was conducted in adult zebrafinches, gives insight into how this genetic mutation impairs a network of nerve cells to cause the stuttering and stammering typical of people with FoxP2 mutations. It appears Nov. 21 in an early online edition of the journal Neuron.
"Our results integrate a lot of different observations that have accrued on the FoxP2 mutation and cast a different perspective on what this mutation is doing," said Richard Mooney, Ph.D., the George Barth Geller professor of neurobiology at Duke University School of Medicine and a member of the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences. "FoxP2 mutations do not simply result in a cognitive or learning deficit, but also produce an ongoing motor deficit. Individuals with these mutations can still learn and can still improve; it is just harder for them to reliably hit the right mark."
About 15 years ago, researchers discovered a British family with many members suffering from severe speech and language deficits. Geneticists eventually pinned down the culprit — a gene called forkhead box transcription factor or FoxP2 — that was mutated in all the affected individuals. The discovery led many to believe FoxP2 was a “language gene” that granted humans the ability to speak. But further studies showed that the gene wasn’t unique to humans, and in fact was conserved among all vertebrates, including songbirds.
Though the gene is present in every cell, it is “active,” or turned on, mostly in brain cells, particularly ones residing in a region deep within the brain known as the basal ganglia. This region is dysfunctional in Tourette syndrome, known for its vocal tics and outbursts, and is also shrunk in individuals with FoxP2 mutations.
To explore the complex circuitry involved in these deficits, Mooney and his former graduate student Malavika Murugan, Ph.D., decided to replicate the human mutation in this region of the brain in songbirds. Zebrafinches start learning how to sing 30 days after they hatch, listening to a male tutor and then practicing thousands of times a day until, 60 days later, they are able to make a very good copy of the tutor’s song. As good as that copy is at day 90, the male finch’s song gets even more precise when he “directs” it to a female as part of courtship.
To investigate the role of FoxP2 in the generation of this directed song, Murugan introduced specifically targeted sequences of RNA to suppress FoxP2 activity in the basal ganglia of male zebrafinches. The birds were placed in a glass cage that revealed a female sitting on the other side. Murugan then recorded sonograms of their song to capture the subtle vocal variations indistinguishable to the human ear when they produced directed songs at the female.
Murugan found that though the genetically manipulated males had already learned how to sing, their ability to hit the right note repeatedly in the presence of a female — a behavior critical to attracting a mate — was subpar. This indicates that in songbirds, FoxP2 has an ongoing role in vocal control separate from a role in learning, a distinction that has not been possible to make in humans with FOXP2 mutations.
Having deduced the behavior associated with this genetic mutation, the researchers then identified underlying neural deficits by recording brain activity in birds with normal and altered FoxP2 genes. In one set of experiments, Murugan sent an electrical signal into the input side of the basal ganglia pathway and then used an electrode on the output side to measure how quickly the signal traveled from one side to the other. Surprisingly, the signal moved more quickly through the basal ganglia of FoxP2 mutant songbirds than it did in songbirds with the functional gene.
Murugan also found that dopamine, an important brain chemical involved in brain signaling and the reinforcement of learned behaviors like singing or playing sports, could influence how fast basal ganglia signals propagated in birds with normal but not mutant forms of FoxP2.
"This switch between undirected and directed song is actually dependent on the influx of this neurotransmitter called dopamine," said Murugan, first author of the study. "So what we think is happening is knocking down FoxP2 makes the male incapable of reducing song variability in the presence of a female. An adult male sees the female, there is an influx of dopamine, but because the system is insensitive, the dopamine has no effect and the adult male continues to sing a variable tune." In juveniles, the inability to constrain variability and to respond to dopamine could also account for poor learning.
Though the researchers are cautious not to draw too many parallels between their findings in birds and the deficits in humans, they think their study does highlight the value of songbirds in studying human behaviors and disease.
"Birds are one of the few non-human animals that learn to vocalize," said Mooney. "They produce songs for courtship that they culturally transmit from one generation to the next. Their brains might be a thousandth the size of ours, but in this one dimension, vocal learning, they are our equal."
(Source: today.duke.edu)
Singing mice (scotinomys teguina) are not your average lab rats. Their fur is tawny brown instead of the common white albino strain; they hail from the tropical cloud forests in the mountains of Costa Rica; and, as their name hints, they use song to communicate.
University of Texas at Austin researcher Steven Phelps is examining these unconventional rodents to gain insights into the genes that contribute to the unique singing behavior—information that could help scientists understand and identify genes that affect language in humans.
The song of the singing mouse is a rapid-fire string of high-pitched chirps called trills mostly used by males in dominance displays and to attract mates. Up to 20 chirps are squeaked out per second, sounding similar to birdsong to untrained ears. But unlike birds, the mice generally stick to a song made up of only a single note.
“They sound kind of soft to human ears, but if you slow them down by about three-fold they are pretty dramatic," said Phelps.