Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

173 notes

Infant Cooing, Babbling Linked to Hearing Ability
Infants’ vocalizations throughout the first year follow a set of predictable steps from crying and cooing to forming syllables and first words. However, previous research had not addressed how the amount of vocalizations may differ between hearing and deaf infants. Now, University of Missouri research shows that infant vocalizations are primarily motivated by infants’ ability to hear their own babbling. Additionally, infants with profound hearing loss who received cochlear implants to help correct their hearing soon reached the vocalization levels of their hearing peers, putting them on track for language development.
“Hearing is a critical aspect of infants’ motivation to make early sounds,” said Mary Fagan, an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Science and Disorders in the MU School of Health Professions. “This study shows babies are interested in speech-like sounds and that they increase their babbling when they can hear.”
Fagan studied the vocalizations of 27 hearing infants and 16 infants with profound hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants, which are small electronic devices embedded into the bone behind the ear that replace some functions of the damaged inner ear. She found that infants with profound hearing loss vocalized significantly less than hearing infants. However, when the infants with profound hearing loss received cochlear implants, the infants’ vocalizations increased to the same levels as their hearing peers within four months of receiving the implants.
“After the infants received their cochlear implants, the significant difference in overall vocalization quantity was no longer evident,” Fagan said. “These findings support the importance of early hearing screenings and early cochlear implantation.”
Fagan found that non-speech-like sounds such as crying, laughing and raspberry sounds, were not affected by infants’ hearing ability. She says this finding highlights babies are more interested in speech-like sounds since they increase their production of those sounds such as babbling when they can hear.
“Babies learn so much through sound in the first year of their lives,” Fagan said. “We know learning from others is important to infants’ development, but hearing allows infants to explore their own vocalizations and learn through their own capacity to produce sounds.”
In future research, Fagan hopes to study whether infants explore the sounds of objects such as musical toys to the same degree they explore vocalization.
Fagan’s research, “Frequency of vocalization before and after cochlear implantation: Dynamic effect of auditory feedback on infant behavior,” was published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Infant Cooing, Babbling Linked to Hearing Ability

Infants’ vocalizations throughout the first year follow a set of predictable steps from crying and cooing to forming syllables and first words. However, previous research had not addressed how the amount of vocalizations may differ between hearing and deaf infants. Now, University of Missouri research shows that infant vocalizations are primarily motivated by infants’ ability to hear their own babbling. Additionally, infants with profound hearing loss who received cochlear implants to help correct their hearing soon reached the vocalization levels of their hearing peers, putting them on track for language development.

“Hearing is a critical aspect of infants’ motivation to make early sounds,” said Mary Fagan, an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Science and Disorders in the MU School of Health Professions. “This study shows babies are interested in speech-like sounds and that they increase their babbling when they can hear.”

Fagan studied the vocalizations of 27 hearing infants and 16 infants with profound hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implants, which are small electronic devices embedded into the bone behind the ear that replace some functions of the damaged inner ear. She found that infants with profound hearing loss vocalized significantly less than hearing infants. However, when the infants with profound hearing loss received cochlear implants, the infants’ vocalizations increased to the same levels as their hearing peers within four months of receiving the implants.

“After the infants received their cochlear implants, the significant difference in overall vocalization quantity was no longer evident,” Fagan said. “These findings support the importance of early hearing screenings and early cochlear implantation.”

Fagan found that non-speech-like sounds such as crying, laughing and raspberry sounds, were not affected by infants’ hearing ability. She says this finding highlights babies are more interested in speech-like sounds since they increase their production of those sounds such as babbling when they can hear.

“Babies learn so much through sound in the first year of their lives,” Fagan said. “We know learning from others is important to infants’ development, but hearing allows infants to explore their own vocalizations and learn through their own capacity to produce sounds.”

In future research, Fagan hopes to study whether infants explore the sounds of objects such as musical toys to the same degree they explore vocalization.

Fagan’s research, “Frequency of vocalization before and after cochlear implantation: Dynamic effect of auditory feedback on infant behavior,” was published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Filed under hearing cochlear implant vocalizations language development psychology neuroscience science

  1. juwlie reblogged this from positivelyhear
  2. raincium reblogged this from linguisten
  3. phantompiper reblogged this from positivelyhear and added:
    Ok but this is not news. This is the basic foundation for any language. Of course babies who are deaf don’t babble,...
  4. positivelyhear reblogged this from bbethanyishere and added:
    That’s some incredible science! Again, the earlier you receive the implant, the better.
  5. someonepleasejustshootme reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. lauraleex3 reblogged this from adjuristherapy
  7. alellx reblogged this from linguisten
  8. pretendpsychiatrist reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. musingsofanidiot reblogged this from iconoclastfae
  10. adjuristherapy reblogged this from linguisten
  11. elixandre reblogged this from linguisten
  12. around-again-fly reblogged this from linguisten and added:
    MIZ-CSD
  13. writingfish reblogged this from linguisten
  14. linguisten reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. datgingerbitch reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. theyloved reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. tasteslikecocacola reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. i-married-a-vox-spoopuli reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. doodlesanddiscord reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  20. offyoutrot-oro reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. ohplease-killingmeisso2yearsago reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. davidivov reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  23. seetobe reblogged this from miniplaguedoctor
  24. darylelockhart reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. doctordonnadances reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  26. withportalsithink reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  27. purpulltreez reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters