Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

412 notes

New study throws into question long-held belief about depression
New evidence puts into doubt the long-standing belief that a deficiency in serotonin — a chemical messenger in the brain — plays a central role in depression. In the journal ACS Chemical Neuroscience, scientists report that mice lacking the ability to make serotonin in their brains (and thus should have been “depressed” by conventional wisdom) did not show depression-like symptoms.
Donald Kuhn and colleagues at the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine note that depression poses a major public health problem. More than 350 million people suffer from it, according to the World Health Organization, and it is the leading cause of disability across the globe. In the late 1980s, the now well-known antidepressant Prozac was introduced. The drug works mainly by increasing the amounts of one substance in the brain — serotonin. So scientists came to believe that boosting levels of the signaling molecule was the key to solving depression. Based on this idea, many other drugs to treat the condition entered the picture. But now researchers know that 60 to 70 percent of these patients continue to feel depressed, even while taking the drugs. Kuhn’s team set out to study what role, if any, serotonin played in the condition.
To do this, they developed “knockout” mice that lacked the ability to produce serotonin in their brains. The scientists ran a battery of behavioral tests. Interestingly, the mice were compulsive and extremely aggressive, but didn’t show signs of depression-like symptoms. Another surprising finding is that when put under stress, the knockout mice behaved in the same way most of the normal mice did. Also, a subset of the knockout mice responded therapeutically to antidepressant medications in a similar manner to the normal mice. These findings further suggest that serotonin is not a major player in the condition, and different factors must be involved. These results could dramatically alter how the search for new antidepressants moves forward in the future, the researchers conclude.

New study throws into question long-held belief about depression

New evidence puts into doubt the long-standing belief that a deficiency in serotonin — a chemical messenger in the brain — plays a central role in depression. In the journal ACS Chemical Neuroscience, scientists report that mice lacking the ability to make serotonin in their brains (and thus should have been “depressed” by conventional wisdom) did not show depression-like symptoms.

Donald Kuhn and colleagues at the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center and Wayne State University School of Medicine note that depression poses a major public health problem. More than 350 million people suffer from it, according to the World Health Organization, and it is the leading cause of disability across the globe. In the late 1980s, the now well-known antidepressant Prozac was introduced. The drug works mainly by increasing the amounts of one substance in the brain — serotonin. So scientists came to believe that boosting levels of the signaling molecule was the key to solving depression. Based on this idea, many other drugs to treat the condition entered the picture. But now researchers know that 60 to 70 percent of these patients continue to feel depressed, even while taking the drugs. Kuhn’s team set out to study what role, if any, serotonin played in the condition.

To do this, they developed “knockout” mice that lacked the ability to produce serotonin in their brains. The scientists ran a battery of behavioral tests. Interestingly, the mice were compulsive and extremely aggressive, but didn’t show signs of depression-like symptoms. Another surprising finding is that when put under stress, the knockout mice behaved in the same way most of the normal mice did. Also, a subset of the knockout mice responded therapeutically to antidepressant medications in a similar manner to the normal mice. These findings further suggest that serotonin is not a major player in the condition, and different factors must be involved. These results could dramatically alter how the search for new antidepressants moves forward in the future, the researchers conclude.

Filed under serotonin depression antidepressants SSRIs neuroscience science

  1. krst05 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. hopeful-n-hopeless reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. dreamlessly-here reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. ddeadcode reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. whatthefuton reblogged this from membranoproliferative
  6. ask-nullenvoid reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. arc-flash-and-shock-hazard reblogged this from teratocybernetics
  8. teratocybernetics reblogged this from jellyfishdirigible
  9. disco-halo reblogged this from gryphynshadow
  10. gryphynshadow reblogged this from swordofomens
  11. theraconteurtimelady reblogged this from ajhasaplan
  12. blueberrytomkins reblogged this from ajhasaplan
  13. ajhasaplan reblogged this from drop-deaddream
  14. zuriarulealeron reblogged this from profoundboners
  15. awriter314 reblogged this from drop-deaddream
  16. verolpstalker reblogged this from romainereigns
  17. romainereigns reblogged this from drop-deaddream
  18. vadanstuff reblogged this from profoundboners
  19. marseeargh reblogged this from thesynapticsnap
  20. drop-deaddream reblogged this from profoundboners
  21. profoundboners reblogged this from thesynapticsnap
  22. thesynapticsnap reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  23. kellythepsycho reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters