Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

133 notes

Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasing in frequency as the global population ages. Five drugs are approved for treatment of AD, including four cholinesterase inhibitors and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist. We have an urgent need to find new therapies for AD.
Methods
We examined Clinicaltrials.gov, a public website that records ongoing clinical trials. We examined the decade of 2002 to 2012, to better understand AD-drug development. We reviewed trials by sponsor, sites, drug mechanism of action, duration, number of patients required, and rate of success in terms of advancement from one phase to the next. We also reviewed the current AD therapy pipeline.
Results
During the 2002 to 2012 observation period, 413 AD trials were performed: 124 Phase 1 trials, 206 Phase 2 trials, and 83 Phase 3 trials. Seventy-eight percent were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. The United States of America (U.S.) remains the single world region with the greatest number of trials; cumulatively, more non-U.S. than U.S. trials are performed. The largest number of registered trials addressed symptomatic agents aimed at improving cognition (36.6%), followed by trials of disease-modifying small molecules (35.1%) and trials of disease-modifying immunotherapies (18%). The mean length of trials increases from Phase 2 to Phase 3, and the number of participants in trials increases between Phase 2 and Phase 3. Trials of disease-modifying agents are larger and longer than those for symptomatic agents. A very high attrition rate was found, with an overall success rate during the 2002 to 2012 period of 0.4% (99.6% failure).
Conclusions
The Clinicaltrials.gov database demonstrates that relatively few clinical trials are undertaken for AD therapeutics, considering the magnitude of the problem. The success rate for advancing from one phase to another is low, and the number of compounds progressing to regulatory review is among the lowest found in any therapeutic area. The AD drug-development ecosystem requires support.
Full Article
(Image: Shutterstock)

Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasing in frequency as the global population ages. Five drugs are approved for treatment of AD, including four cholinesterase inhibitors and an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist. We have an urgent need to find new therapies for AD.

Methods

We examined Clinicaltrials.gov, a public website that records ongoing clinical trials. We examined the decade of 2002 to 2012, to better understand AD-drug development. We reviewed trials by sponsor, sites, drug mechanism of action, duration, number of patients required, and rate of success in terms of advancement from one phase to the next. We also reviewed the current AD therapy pipeline.

Results

During the 2002 to 2012 observation period, 413 AD trials were performed: 124 Phase 1 trials, 206 Phase 2 trials, and 83 Phase 3 trials. Seventy-eight percent were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. The United States of America (U.S.) remains the single world region with the greatest number of trials; cumulatively, more non-U.S. than U.S. trials are performed. The largest number of registered trials addressed symptomatic agents aimed at improving cognition (36.6%), followed by trials of disease-modifying small molecules (35.1%) and trials of disease-modifying immunotherapies (18%). The mean length of trials increases from Phase 2 to Phase 3, and the number of participants in trials increases between Phase 2 and Phase 3. Trials of disease-modifying agents are larger and longer than those for symptomatic agents. A very high attrition rate was found, with an overall success rate during the 2002 to 2012 period of 0.4% (99.6% failure).

Conclusions

The Clinicaltrials.gov database demonstrates that relatively few clinical trials are undertaken for AD therapeutics, considering the magnitude of the problem. The success rate for advancing from one phase to another is low, and the number of compounds progressing to regulatory review is among the lowest found in any therapeutic area. The AD drug-development ecosystem requires support.

Full Article

(Image: Shutterstock)

Filed under alzheimer's disease drug development health science

  1. notastupidape reblogged this from rawrjanna
  2. ggoga reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. xachyn reblogged this from shychemist
  4. nerd-in-the-sky-with-diamonds reblogged this from shychemist
  5. shychemist reblogged this from mindblowingscience
  6. unexpectedrxns reblogged this from organicalchemist
  7. holy-shit-8 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  8. organicalchemist reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. pharmaustria reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. andyousaidwhat reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. diabolicalillumination reblogged this from mindblowingscience
  12. qbfq reblogged this from mindblowingscience
  13. raginrayguns reblogged this from mindblowingscience
  14. entrop-e reblogged this from mindblowingscience
  15. mindblowingscience reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. mydoctorsdoctor reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. worldofduality reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. nrf2advantage reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. majeet reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters