Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

115 notes

Study Raises Questions about Longstanding Forensic Identification Technique
Forensic experts have long used the shape of a person’s skull to make positive identifications of human remains. But those findings may now be called into question, since a new study from North Carolina State University shows that there is not enough variation in skull shapes to make a positive ID.
“In a lot of cases, murder victims or the victims of disasters are from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and don’t have extensive dental records we can use to make a match,” says Dr. Ann Ross, a forensic expert and professor of anthropology at NC State who is senior author of a paper on the new study. “But those people may have been in car accidents or other incidents that led them to have their skulls X-rayed in emergency rooms or elsewhere. And those skull X-rays have often been used to make IDs. I’ve done it myself.
“But now we’ve tried to validate this technique, and our research shows that the shape of the skull isn’t enough to make a positive ID,” Ross says.
At issue is the “cranial vault outline,” not the “face” of the skull. The cranial vault outline is the profile of the skull when viewed from the side, running from just above the bridge of the nose to the point where the skull and neck meet.
For the study, the researchers surveyed 106 members of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Survey participants were asked to evaluate 14 antemortem X-rays and five postmortem X-rays. Participants were then asked to match the 5 postmortem X-rays with the appropriate antemortem X-ray, effectively establishing a positive ID.
But the researchers found that only 47 percent of the participants made accurate identifications on all five skulls. Participants who have Ph.D.s did slightly better, with 56 percent of them getting all five correct. (The test has been made available here so that anyone can take it.)
“This doesn’t mean that cranial vault outlines aren’t useful,” says Ashley Maxwell, lead author of the paper and a former graduate student at NC State. “For example, outlines can be valuable if teeth or other features are missing or have been destroyed. But it does mean that cranial vault outlines shouldn’t be given too much weight.
“The more characteristics we can take into account, such as facial features and cranial vault outlines, the more accurate we can be,” Maxwell says.

Study Raises Questions about Longstanding Forensic Identification Technique

Forensic experts have long used the shape of a person’s skull to make positive identifications of human remains. But those findings may now be called into question, since a new study from North Carolina State University shows that there is not enough variation in skull shapes to make a positive ID.

“In a lot of cases, murder victims or the victims of disasters are from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and don’t have extensive dental records we can use to make a match,” says Dr. Ann Ross, a forensic expert and professor of anthropology at NC State who is senior author of a paper on the new study. “But those people may have been in car accidents or other incidents that led them to have their skulls X-rayed in emergency rooms or elsewhere. And those skull X-rays have often been used to make IDs. I’ve done it myself.

“But now we’ve tried to validate this technique, and our research shows that the shape of the skull isn’t enough to make a positive ID,” Ross says.

At issue is the “cranial vault outline,” not the “face” of the skull. The cranial vault outline is the profile of the skull when viewed from the side, running from just above the bridge of the nose to the point where the skull and neck meet.

For the study, the researchers surveyed 106 members of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Survey participants were asked to evaluate 14 antemortem X-rays and five postmortem X-rays. Participants were then asked to match the 5 postmortem X-rays with the appropriate antemortem X-ray, effectively establishing a positive ID.

But the researchers found that only 47 percent of the participants made accurate identifications on all five skulls. Participants who have Ph.D.s did slightly better, with 56 percent of them getting all five correct. (The test has been made available here so that anyone can take it.)

“This doesn’t mean that cranial vault outlines aren’t useful,” says Ashley Maxwell, lead author of the paper and a former graduate student at NC State. “For example, outlines can be valuable if teeth or other features are missing or have been destroyed. But it does mean that cranial vault outlines shouldn’t be given too much weight.

“The more characteristics we can take into account, such as facial features and cranial vault outlines, the more accurate we can be,” Maxwell says.

Filed under cranial vault outline x-rays neuroimaging forensics neuroscience science

  1. crimeandscience reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. goingtohaunt reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. contusion reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. interesting-stuff reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  5. dermoosealini reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. canvastheory reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  7. fluentpotato reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  8. lainneyloveliness reblogged this from thehumancareer
  9. sickroomcookery reblogged this from osteologika
  10. thehumancareer reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  11. lucifer-ann reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  12. blackboxmessiah reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  13. ch-el-see-yuh reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  14. implicitdemandforjoshdun reblogged this from lipsredasarose
  15. fatigadecombate reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  16. lipsredasarose reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  17. anything-to-have-had reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  18. vexenstraug reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  19. thewatchersofthewall reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  20. osteologika reblogged this from dead-men-talking
  21. dead-men-talking reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  22. kammartinez reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  23. narwhalington reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  24. nefar-ba3d reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  25. nautisk reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  26. caddiewhite reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
  27. blacknekomata reblogged this from theolduvaigorge
free counters