Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

105 notes

Computer smart as a 4-year-old

Artificial and natural knowledge researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago have IQ-tested one of the best available artificial intelligence systems to see how intelligent it really is.
Turns out–it’s about as smart as the average 4-year-old, they will report July 17 at the U.S. Artificial Intelligence Conference in Bellevue, Wash.
The UIC team put ConceptNet 4, an artificial intelligence system developed at M.I.T., through the verbal portions of the Weschsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Test, a standard IQ assessment for young children.
They found ConceptNet 4 has the average IQ of a young child. But unlike most children, the machine’s scores were very uneven across different portions of the test.
“If a child had scores that varied this much, it might be a symptom that something was wrong,” said Robert Sloan, professor and head of computer science at UIC, and lead author on the study.
Sloan said ConceptNet 4 did very well on a test of vocabulary and on a test of its ability to recognize similarities.
“But ConceptNet 4 did dramatically worse than average on comprehension—the ‘why’ questions,” he said.
One of the hardest problems in building an artificial intelligence, Sloan said, is devising a computer program that can make sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts–the dictionary definition of commonsense.
Commonsense has eluded AI engineers because it requires both a very large collection of facts and what Sloan calls implicit facts–things so obvious that we don’t know we know them. A computer may know the temperature at which water freezes, but we know that ice is cold.
“All of us know a huge number of things,” said Sloan. “As babies, we crawled around and yanked on things and learned that things fall. We yanked on other things and learned that dogs and cats don’t appreciate having their tails pulled.” Life is a rich learning environment.
“We’re still very far from programs with commonsense–AI that can answer comprehension questions with the skill of a child of 8,” said Sloan. He and his colleagues hope the study will help to focus attention on the “hard spots” in AI research.

Computer smart as a 4-year-old

Artificial and natural knowledge researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago have IQ-tested one of the best available artificial intelligence systems to see how intelligent it really is.

Turns out–it’s about as smart as the average 4-year-old, they will report July 17 at the U.S. Artificial Intelligence Conference in Bellevue, Wash.

The UIC team put ConceptNet 4, an artificial intelligence system developed at M.I.T., through the verbal portions of the Weschsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Test, a standard IQ assessment for young children.

They found ConceptNet 4 has the average IQ of a young child. But unlike most children, the machine’s scores were very uneven across different portions of the test.

“If a child had scores that varied this much, it might be a symptom that something was wrong,” said Robert Sloan, professor and head of computer science at UIC, and lead author on the study.

Sloan said ConceptNet 4 did very well on a test of vocabulary and on a test of its ability to recognize similarities.

“But ConceptNet 4 did dramatically worse than average on comprehension—the ‘why’ questions,” he said.

One of the hardest problems in building an artificial intelligence, Sloan said, is devising a computer program that can make sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts–the dictionary definition of commonsense.

Commonsense has eluded AI engineers because it requires both a very large collection of facts and what Sloan calls implicit facts–things so obvious that we don’t know we know them. A computer may know the temperature at which water freezes, but we know that ice is cold.

“All of us know a huge number of things,” said Sloan. “As babies, we crawled around and yanked on things and learned that things fall. We yanked on other things and learned that dogs and cats don’t appreciate having their tails pulled.” Life is a rich learning environment.

“We’re still very far from programs with commonsense–AI that can answer comprehension questions with the skill of a child of 8,” said Sloan. He and his colleagues hope the study will help to focus attention on the “hard spots” in AI research.

Filed under ConceptNet 4 AI artificial intelligence neuroscience science

  1. dermoosealini reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Information means nothing without the ability to understand it.
  2. vanesa reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. tansytum reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. r-r-riddikulus reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. qualagen reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. omgpickaname reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. emogentcorp reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  8. lazerpoynter reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. maddigirl reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    IF YOU LOVE TO SING READ THIS
  10. meditermsandthings reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. steampunkdash reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. thadiusmestopheles reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. doctordonnadances reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. jackoshadows reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. msk-page reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. keatonaltom reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. the-clockwork-alex reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. iseeagirl reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. sulthind reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Yeah but you can’t play games on a four year old, the resolution sucks
  20. ferretburrow reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. ajani-goldmane reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. icantthinkofacreativetitle reblogged this from thecivilisedwookie
  23. nastybagginses reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  24. thecivilisedwookie reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. ruanruans reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Recreating common sense.
  26. george-allan reblogged this from knowscience
  27. horsebot-3000 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Eeeep they’re going to start thinking for themselves…. I’m ok with that. would be interesting.
free counters