Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

135 notes

Semantics on the basis of words’ connectivity

It is now possible to identify the meaning of words with multiple meanings, without using their semantic context

image

Two Brazilian physicists have now devised a method to automatically elucidate the meaning of words with several senses, based solely on their patterns of connectivity with nearby words in a given sentence – and not on semantics. Thiago Silva and Diego Amancio from the University of São Paulo, Brazil, reveal, in a paper about to be published in EPJ B, how they modelled classics texts as complex networks in order to derive their meaning. This type of model plays a key role in several natural processing language tasks such as machine translation, information retrieval, content analysis and text processing.

In this study, the authors chose a set of ten so-called polysemous words—words with multiple meanings—such as bear, jam, just, rock or present. They then verified their patterns of connectivity with nearby words in the text of literary classics such as Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Specifically, they established a model that consisted of a set of nodes representing words connected by their “edges,” if they are adjacent in a text.

The authors then compared the results of their disambiguation exercise with the traditional semantic-based approach. They observed significant accuracy rates in identifying the suitable meanings when using both techniques. The approach described in this study, based on a so-called deterministic tourist walk characterisation, can therefore be considered a complementary methodology for distinguishing between word senses.In future works, the authors are planning to devise new measures to connect not only adjacent words, but also words within a given interval in order to enhance the ability of the model to grasp semantic factors. This approach is supported by another recent study by the same authors, showing that traditional complex network measures mainly depend on the syntax.

(Source: springer.com)

Filed under language semantics complex networks learning techniques tourist walk neuroscience science

  1. noon-after reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. cfburch4 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Crazy. Amazing. Wow.
  3. therosasalvahe6 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. un-presagio-imaginario reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. chicagowindchill reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. ashynarr reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. abijoor reblogged this from productivegossip
  8. pakiparksocial reblogged this from analyticisms
  9. analyticisms reblogged this from productivegossip and added:
    Truly fascinating stuff that could revolutionize social listening and sentiment measurement. It’s about time we move...
  10. productivegossip reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. sdkkds reblogged this from raskolnika
  12. raskolnika reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. membranoproliferative reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. jaggedwolf reblogged this from jacknotzak
  15. crownedglorious reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. yesmotherok reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. sarahbecker87 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. saraahlynne reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. sequoiawintersnight reblogged this from jacknotzak
  20. ripley77690 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. imbalanceinbalance reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. mangy-mongrel reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  23. creativityismental reblogged this from secretphoton
  24. rneta-rnaus reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. sempre-attraversiamo reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  26. secretphoton reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I really wish that I could read the full article without coughing up monies, but hey, this is really goddamn cool...
  27. mc-reg reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters