Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

149 notes

Human brain treats prosthetic devices as part of the body
People with spinal cord injuries show strong association of wheelchairs as part of their body, not extension of immobile limbs injuries.
The human brain can learn to treat relevant prosthetics as a substitute for a non-working body part, according to research published March 6 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Mariella Pazzaglia and colleagues from Sapienza University and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia of Rome in Italy, supported by the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegie.
The researchers found that wheelchair-bound study participants with spinal cord injuries perceived their body’s edges as being plastic and flexible to include the wheelchair, independent of time since their injury or experience with using a wheelchair. Patients with lower spinal cord injuries who retained upper body movement showed a stronger association of the wheelchair with their body than those who had spinal cord impairments in the entire body.
According to the authors, this suggests that rather than being thought of only as an extension of the immobile limbs, the wheelchairs had become tangible, functional substitutes for the affected body part. As Pazzaglia explains, “The corporeal awareness of the tool emerges not merely as an extension of the body but as a substitute for, and part of, the functional self.”
Previous studies have shown that people with prosthetic devices that extend or restore movement may make such tools part of their physical identity, but whether this integration was due to prolonged use or a result of altered sensory input was unclear. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggest that it may be the latter, as the brain appears to continuously update bodily signals to incorporate these tools into a sense of the body. The study concludes that this ability may have applications in rehabilitation of physically impaired people.
(Image: University of Miami)

Human brain treats prosthetic devices as part of the body

People with spinal cord injuries show strong association of wheelchairs as part of their body, not extension of immobile limbs injuries.

The human brain can learn to treat relevant prosthetics as a substitute for a non-working body part, according to research published March 6 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Mariella Pazzaglia and colleagues from Sapienza University and IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia of Rome in Italy, supported by the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegie.

The researchers found that wheelchair-bound study participants with spinal cord injuries perceived their body’s edges as being plastic and flexible to include the wheelchair, independent of time since their injury or experience with using a wheelchair. Patients with lower spinal cord injuries who retained upper body movement showed a stronger association of the wheelchair with their body than those who had spinal cord impairments in the entire body.

According to the authors, this suggests that rather than being thought of only as an extension of the immobile limbs, the wheelchairs had become tangible, functional substitutes for the affected body part. As Pazzaglia explains, “The corporeal awareness of the tool emerges not merely as an extension of the body but as a substitute for, and part of, the functional self.”

Previous studies have shown that people with prosthetic devices that extend or restore movement may make such tools part of their physical identity, but whether this integration was due to prolonged use or a result of altered sensory input was unclear. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggest that it may be the latter, as the brain appears to continuously update bodily signals to incorporate these tools into a sense of the body. The study concludes that this ability may have applications in rehabilitation of physically impaired people.

(Image: University of Miami)

Filed under spinal cord injuries prosthetic devices prosthetics spinal cord medicine neuroscience science

  1. idlnmclean reblogged this from wolvensnothere
  2. slow-motion-shadow reblogged this from idlnmclean
  3. bd648 reblogged this from wolvensnothere and added:
    A question on the “Locked-In”. Are we aware if that condition is due to a deteriorated nerve connection or instead a...
  4. wolvensnothere reblogged this from idlnmclean and added:
    And this is why Hard-Wired haptic responses are a necessary step for direct prostheses as well as those...
  5. sinshine reblogged this from idlnmclean
  6. atheoryofmind reblogged this from s33
  7. s33 reblogged this from idlnmclean and added:
    I think that studying these kinds of phenomena shows us that the mapping/computation model of consciousness is not...
  8. utopiamatter reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. hannahh1995 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. thisisyourfuturearchive reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. comoconociatumadre reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. bacchanaliandelights reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I know that I think of mine as part of me. I use the sensation of what I’m rolling over to help understand my world just...
  13. psychoneurogenesis reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. imaginina reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I’m afraid I’m having difficulty seeing around my immediate reaction of, “PEOPLE IN WHEELCHAIRS ARE CYBORGS. Science...
  15. george-allan reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. loveohatewhatever reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. magdanightingale reblogged this from almualimbeatbox
  18. silas216 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. phenomenallyextraordinary123 reblogged this from icnyght
free counters