Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

262 notes

Reconstructing the Past: How Recalling Memories Alters Them
Recently the neurologist and author Oliver Sacks recalled a vivid childhood memory, recounted in his autobiography, Uncle Tungsten.
During WWII he lived in London during the Blitz, and on one occasion:

"…an incendiary bomb, a thermite bomb, fell behind our house and burned with a terrible, white-hot heat. My father had a stirrup pump, and my brothers carried pails of water to him, but water seemed useless against this infernal fire—indeed, made it burn even more furiously. There was a vicious hissing and sputtering when the water hit the white-hot metal, and meanwhile the bomb was melting its own casing and throwing blobs and jets of molten metal in all directions."

Except when his autobiography came out, one of his older brothers told him he’d misremembered the event. In fact both of them had been at school when the bomb struck so they could not have witnessed the explosion.
The ‘false’ memory, it turned out, was implanted by a letter. Their elder brother had written to them, describing the frightening event, and this had lodged in his mind. Over the years the letter had gone from a third-person report to a first-person ‘memory’.
Turning the memory over in his mind, Sacks writes that he still cannot see how the memory of the bomb exploding can be false. There is no difference between this memory and others he knows to be true; it felt like he was really there.
This sort of experience is probably much more common than we might like to imagine. Many memories which have the scent of authenticity may turn out to be misremembered, if not totally fictitious events, if only we could check. Without some other source with which to corroborate, it is hard verify the facts, especially for events that took place long ago.
That these sorts of distortions to memory happen is unquestioned, what fascinates is how it comes about. Does the long passage of time warp the memory, or is there some more active process that causes the change?
A study published recently sheds some light on this process and provides a model for how memories like Sack’s become distorted.

Reconstructing the Past: How Recalling Memories Alters Them

Recently the neurologist and author Oliver Sacks recalled a vivid childhood memory, recounted in his autobiography, Uncle Tungsten.

During WWII he lived in London during the Blitz, and on one occasion:

"…an incendiary bomb, a thermite bomb, fell behind our house and burned with a terrible, white-hot heat. My father had a stirrup pump, and my brothers carried pails of water to him, but water seemed useless against this infernal fire—indeed, made it burn even more furiously. There was a vicious hissing and sputtering when the water hit the white-hot metal, and meanwhile the bomb was melting its own casing and throwing blobs and jets of molten metal in all directions."

Except when his autobiography came out, one of his older brothers told him he’d misremembered the event. In fact both of them had been at school when the bomb struck so they could not have witnessed the explosion.

The ‘false’ memory, it turned out, was implanted by a letter. Their elder brother had written to them, describing the frightening event, and this had lodged in his mind. Over the years the letter had gone from a third-person report to a first-person ‘memory’.

Turning the memory over in his mind, Sacks writes that he still cannot see how the memory of the bomb exploding can be false. There is no difference between this memory and others he knows to be true; it felt like he was really there.

This sort of experience is probably much more common than we might like to imagine. Many memories which have the scent of authenticity may turn out to be misremembered, if not totally fictitious events, if only we could check. Without some other source with which to corroborate, it is hard verify the facts, especially for events that took place long ago.

That these sorts of distortions to memory happen is unquestioned, what fascinates is how it comes about. Does the long passage of time warp the memory, or is there some more active process that causes the change?

A study published recently sheds some light on this process and provides a model for how memories like Sack’s become distorted.

Filed under memory false memory episodic memory autobiographical memory psychology neuroscience science

  1. memorystuffforclass reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. emmaall reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. mremptyness reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Don’t think all ur memories are true or that they all even happened
  4. blissfullydoomed reblogged this from thejavaman
  5. thejavaman reblogged this from spetharrific
  6. robin-redbreast reblogged this from hoistdatredrum
  7. sensdornam reblogged this from hoistdatredrum
  8. hoistdatredrum reblogged this from spetharrific
  9. spetharrific reblogged this from contemplatingmadness
  10. thekingoflegoland reblogged this from somuchscience
  11. alexdotexe reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. cyborgsdonthavetimeforthat reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. cycloalvatro reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. neverknwsbest reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. al-300 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. moviesorientated reblogged this from somuchscience
  17. exploding-boy reblogged this from cyclicprogression
  18. h8upr0bs reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. weed-sexx-psychology reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I learned this last week in class.. And last semester. Ha
  20. somuchscience reblogged this from sagansense
  21. vanityandvomit reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. becbecbeccaw reblogged this from toomuchsky
  23. toomuchsky reblogged this from creativityismental and added:
    This is one of the biggest reasons why anecdotal evidence isn’t weighted heavily upon in courts. Because sometimes even...
  24. betsumei reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters