Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

380 notes

Expert psychologist suggests the era of genius scientists is over
Dean Keith Simonton, a psychology professor at the University of California, has published a comment piece in the journal Nature, where he argues that it’s unlikely mankind will ever produce another Einstein, Newton, Darwin, etc. This is because, he says, we’ve already discovered all the most basic ideas that describe how the natural world works. Any new work, will involve little more than adding to our knowledge base.
Simonton’s comments are likely to draw a strong reaction, both in and out of the science world. It’s been the geniuses among us that have driven science forward for thousands of years, after all. If no more geniuses appear to offer an entirely new way of looking at things, how will the human race ever reach new heights?
Simonton has been studying geniuses and their contributions to science for more than 30 years and has even written books on them. He also writes that he hopes he is wrong in his assessment, even as he clearly doesn’t think he is. Sadly, the past several decades only offer proof. Since the time of Einstein, he says, no one has really come up with anything that would mark them as a giant in the field, to be looked up to hundreds, if not thousands of years from now. Worse perhaps, he details how the way modern science is conducted is only adding to the problem. Rather than fostering lone wolves pondering the universe in isolation, the new paradigm has researchers working together as teams, efficiently going about their way, marching towards incremental increases in knowledge. That doesn’t leave much room for true insight, which is of course, a necessary ingredient for genius level discoveries.
Simonton could be wrong of course – there might yet be some person that looks at all that has been discovered and compares it with his or her own observations, and finds that what we think we know, is completely wrong, and offers evidence of something truly groundbreaking as an alternative. The study of astrophysics, for example, appears ripe for a new approach. Scientists are becoming increasingly frustrated in trying to explain why the universe is not just expanding, but is doing so at an increasing rate. Perhaps most of the theories put forth over the past half-century or so, are completely off base. Modern science can’t even explain gravity, after all. Isn’t it possible that there is something at work that will need the intelligence, insight and courage of an Einstein to figure out? It appears we as a species are counting on it, even as we wonder if it’s even possible.

Expert psychologist suggests the era of genius scientists is over

Dean Keith Simonton, a psychology professor at the University of California, has published a comment piece in the journal Nature, where he argues that it’s unlikely mankind will ever produce another Einstein, Newton, Darwin, etc. This is because, he says, we’ve already discovered all the most basic ideas that describe how the natural world works. Any new work, will involve little more than adding to our knowledge base.

Simonton’s comments are likely to draw a strong reaction, both in and out of the science world. It’s been the geniuses among us that have driven science forward for thousands of years, after all. If no more geniuses appear to offer an entirely new way of looking at things, how will the human race ever reach new heights?

Simonton has been studying geniuses and their contributions to science for more than 30 years and has even written books on them. He also writes that he hopes he is wrong in his assessment, even as he clearly doesn’t think he is. Sadly, the past several decades only offer proof. Since the time of Einstein, he says, no one has really come up with anything that would mark them as a giant in the field, to be looked up to hundreds, if not thousands of years from now. Worse perhaps, he details how the way modern science is conducted is only adding to the problem. Rather than fostering lone wolves pondering the universe in isolation, the new paradigm has researchers working together as teams, efficiently going about their way, marching towards incremental increases in knowledge. That doesn’t leave much room for true insight, which is of course, a necessary ingredient for genius level discoveries.

Simonton could be wrong of course – there might yet be some person that looks at all that has been discovered and compares it with his or her own observations, and finds that what we think we know, is completely wrong, and offers evidence of something truly groundbreaking as an alternative. The study of astrophysics, for example, appears ripe for a new approach. Scientists are becoming increasingly frustrated in trying to explain why the universe is not just expanding, but is doing so at an increasing rate. Perhaps most of the theories put forth over the past half-century or so, are completely off base. Modern science can’t even explain gravity, after all. Isn’t it possible that there is something at work that will need the intelligence, insight and courage of an Einstein to figure out? It appears we as a species are counting on it, even as we wonder if it’s even possible.

Filed under geniuses scientific discoveries science

  1. retard-dopefish reblogged this from alexdotexe and added:
    I dunno, I think it’s possible that something we may consider to be basic knowledge could turn out to be wrong.
  2. ogdensoldfirewhiskey reblogged this from manakins-inner-monologue
  3. manakins-inner-monologue reblogged this from lospaziobianco
  4. lospaziobianco reblogged this from alexdotexe
  5. alexdotexe reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. ano-hito-wa reblogged this from blogdelespacio
  7. burningjustforyou reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Wouldn’t that be disappointing? I don’t believe that you can make an accurate judgement on this question. Surely any...
  8. emilypeapot reblogged this from sagansense and added:
    Expert psychologist suggests the era of genius scientists is over Dean Keith Simonton, a psychology professor at the...
  9. focusedgravity reblogged this from starsaremymuse
  10. the-eternal-feminine-leads-us reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. japanties-in-the-washer reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    :( what?
  12. sorrowandstrength reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. thelastsonginthislittleplanet reblogged this from blogdelespacio
  14. mindisanescape reblogged this from mardhiyya
  15. invictascientia reblogged this from gerypratama and added:
    Are we doomed then
  16. iwanttobeafirefly reblogged this from amazingthingsisee
  17. kajsdaksdklololololololo reblogged this from blogdelespacio
  18. nod-at-the-bird reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  19. abrokecollegekid reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  20. thothofnorth reblogged this from okorogariist
  21. 13barsofcaramel reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  22. josepodel reblogged this from blogdelespacio and added:
    Reflexión interesante. Sin embargo, no estoy de acuerdo con el autor. Ahora y en el futuro tenemos más y mejores medios...
  23. philotical reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I am positive! I’ve heard, read and saw over the last few weeks about numerous promising talents in this field.. It...
  24. smallwombat reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters