Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

309 notes



Scientists Offer New Way To Look At The Origins Of Life
People have been trying to understand the origins of life on Earth through scientific means since the concept of science began and a pair of Arizona State University researchers suggests in a new report that we’ve been approaching the question incorrectly, almost from the beginning.
In a paper titled, “The algorithmic origins of life,” Paul Davies and Sara Walker proposed that understanding the correct chemical makeup for the origin of life only tells part of the story and scientists should also be focused on how chemical information is organized into life-creating processes.
They equate the shift in perspective to understanding how a computer works. To function, a computer not only needs hardware, akin to life’s chemical makeup, it also needs software, or chemical information.
“When we describe biological processes we typically use informational narratives – cells send out signals, developmental programs are run, coded instructions are read, genomic data are transmitted between generations and so forth,” Walker said. “So identifying life’s origin in the way information is processed and managed can open up new avenues for research.”
“We propose that the transition from non-life to life is unique and definable,” added Davies. “We suggest that life may be characterized by its distinctive and active use of information, thus providing a roadmap to identify rigorous criteria for the emergence of life. This is in sharp contrast to a century of thought in which the transition to life has been cast as a problem of chemistry, with the goal of identifying a plausible reaction pathway from chemical mixtures to a living entity.”
Walker and Davies argue that their approach skirts many issues that have confounded previous efforts to define the origin of life.

Scientists Offer New Way To Look At The Origins Of Life

People have been trying to understand the origins of life on Earth through scientific means since the concept of science began and a pair of Arizona State University researchers suggests in a new report that we’ve been approaching the question incorrectly, almost from the beginning.

In a paper titled, “The algorithmic origins of life,” Paul Davies and Sara Walker proposed that understanding the correct chemical makeup for the origin of life only tells part of the story and scientists should also be focused on how chemical information is organized into life-creating processes.

They equate the shift in perspective to understanding how a computer works. To function, a computer not only needs hardware, akin to life’s chemical makeup, it also needs software, or chemical information.

“When we describe biological processes we typically use informational narratives – cells send out signals, developmental programs are run, coded instructions are read, genomic data are transmitted between generations and so forth,” Walker said. “So identifying life’s origin in the way information is processed and managed can open up new avenues for research.”

“We propose that the transition from non-life to life is unique and definable,” added Davies. “We suggest that life may be characterized by its distinctive and active use of information, thus providing a roadmap to identify rigorous criteria for the emergence of life. This is in sharp contrast to a century of thought in which the transition to life has been cast as a problem of chemistry, with the goal of identifying a plausible reaction pathway from chemical mixtures to a living entity.”

Walker and Davies argue that their approach skirts many issues that have confounded previous efforts to define the origin of life.

Filed under life emergence of life causal architecture evolution science

  1. unxpectedstuff reblogged this from biologylair
  2. ohyoubitch reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. jeand54 reblogged this from biologylair
  4. al25manch reblogged this from biologylair
  5. shumaan reblogged this from biologylair
  6. astrogreg reblogged this from biologylair and added:
    meow
  7. drscottisderivativefree reblogged this from thescienceblog
  8. cafe2361 reblogged this from biologylair
  9. oedipusrexrexrex reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  10. jaisini reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. bersamina79 reblogged this from biologylair and added:
    Bell Gardens Football vs. Arroyo Box Score 11/9/2012 -...
  12. lordiana reblogged this from biologylair
  13. toastfunnypants reblogged this from dermoosealini
  14. dermoosealini reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. notaparagon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. nellexicon reblogged this from science-junkie
  17. legsjet reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  18. hungry-skin-vacant-meat reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. coolandhawwt reblogged this from paradoxicalparadigms
  20. pharmuscidea reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. miriamhel reblogged this from falcemartello
  22. paradoxicalparadigms reblogged this from photonasty
  23. membranoproliferative reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  24. photonasty reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. fartguy reblogged this from falcemartello
  26. haricotsnoirs reblogged this from falcemartello
free counters