Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

147 notes



Pursuing literary immortality illuminates how the mind works
The initial excitement of hearing a new song fades as it’s replayed to death. That’s because the brain naturally functions as a kind of ticking time bomb, obliterating the thrill of artistic sounds, images and words by making them familiar over time.
So the artist, musician or author’s challenge is to create a work that retains its freshness, according to Case Western Reserve University’s Michael Clune in his new book Writing Against Time (Stanford University Press). And, for the artist, musician or writer, creating this newness with each work is a race against “brain time.”
In his book, Clune explained how neurobiological forces designed for our survival naturally make interest in art fade. But the forces don’t stop artists from trying for timelessness.
While the phenomenon is true for all art, the assistant professor of English focused on the intersection of literature and science, describing what writers can do to block or slow that natural erosion over time. Clune builds on his interest in how the brain destroys a lasting enjoyment of art. He has written about and reported on the topic in the neuroscience journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
The brain gradually defeats that initial excitement with boredom, which Clune described as “this dull feeling that your senses have died.”
As writers fight to ward off the reader’s boredom with striking new forms, metaphors and images, the brain works just as fast to extinguish it.
“We are evolutionarily designed so that we focus on new objects and ignore familiar ones,” Clune said. “When the mind confronts a new object, our perception is intense and vivid, but it soon dies with familiarity. Every minute, this feeling fades as the mind grasps the object.”

Pursuing literary immortality illuminates how the mind works

The initial excitement of hearing a new song fades as it’s replayed to death. That’s because the brain naturally functions as a kind of ticking time bomb, obliterating the thrill of artistic sounds, images and words by making them familiar over time.

So the artist, musician or author’s challenge is to create a work that retains its freshness, according to Case Western Reserve University’s Michael Clune in his new book Writing Against Time (Stanford University Press). And, for the artist, musician or writer, creating this newness with each work is a race against “brain time.”

In his book, Clune explained how neurobiological forces designed for our survival naturally make interest in art fade. But the forces don’t stop artists from trying for timelessness.

While the phenomenon is true for all art, the assistant professor of English focused on the intersection of literature and science, describing what writers can do to block or slow that natural erosion over time. Clune builds on his interest in how the brain destroys a lasting enjoyment of art. He has written about and reported on the topic in the neuroscience journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

The brain gradually defeats that initial excitement with boredom, which Clune described as “this dull feeling that your senses have died.”

As writers fight to ward off the reader’s boredom with striking new forms, metaphors and images, the brain works just as fast to extinguish it.

“We are evolutionarily designed so that we focus on new objects and ignore familiar ones,” Clune said. “When the mind confronts a new object, our perception is intense and vivid, but it soon dies with familiarity. Every minute, this feeling fades as the mind grasps the object.”

Filed under brain literature science

  1. street-popper reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. voleurennoir reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. louvette reblogged this from ionsfolly
  4. pharmuscidea reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. brainstufffyi4dew0319 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. comaberenice reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. lookatthisgoddamnlemur reblogged this from to-kennedy
  8. stilltryin reblogged this from ahandsomestark
  9. ahandsomestark reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. kleptoromania reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. sliverdemon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. nighteyes87 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. kloperslegend reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  14. frenchykitten reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  15. amoraes reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. glhfstompy reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. alazywriterthinks reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. thirteenthconriocht reblogged this from justaddrainbows
  19. theredmatinee reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  20. anorangemechanism reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. kittypooch reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters