Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

249 notes


Moral evaluations of harm are instant and emotional
People are able to detect, within a split second, if a hurtful action they are witnessing is intentional or accidental, new research on the brain at the University of Chicago shows.
The study is the first to explain how the brain is hard-wired to recognize when another person is being intentionally harmed. It also provides new insights into how such recognition is connected with emotion and morality, said lead author Jean Decety, the Irving B. Harris Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at UChicago.
“Our data strongly support the notion that determining intentionality is the first step in moral computations,” said Decety, who conducted research on the topic with Stephanie Cacioppo, a research associate (assistant professor) in psychology at UChicago. They published the results in a paper, “The Speed of Morality: A High-Density Electrical Neurological Study,” to be published Dec. 1 and now on early preview in the Journal of Neurophysiology.
The researchers studied adults who watched videos of people who suffered accidental harm (such as being hit with a golf club) and intentional harm (such as being struck with a baseball bat). While watching the videos, brain activity was collected with equipment that accurately maps responses in different regions of the brain and importantly, the timing between these regions. The technique is known as high-density, event-related potentials technology.
The intentional harm sequence produced a response in the brain almost instantly. The study showed that within 60 milliseconds, the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (also known as TPJ area), located in the back of the brain, was first activated, with different activity depending on whether the harm was intentional or accidental. It was followed in quick succession by the amygdala, often linked with emotion, and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (180 milliseconds), the portion of the brain that plays a critical role in moral decision-making.
There was no such response in the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex when the harm was accidental.

Moral evaluations of harm are instant and emotional

People are able to detect, within a split second, if a hurtful action they are witnessing is intentional or accidental, new research on the brain at the University of Chicago shows.

The study is the first to explain how the brain is hard-wired to recognize when another person is being intentionally harmed. It also provides new insights into how such recognition is connected with emotion and morality, said lead author Jean Decety, the Irving B. Harris Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry at UChicago.

“Our data strongly support the notion that determining intentionality is the first step in moral computations,” said Decety, who conducted research on the topic with Stephanie Cacioppo, a research associate (assistant professor) in psychology at UChicago. They published the results in a paper, “The Speed of Morality: A High-Density Electrical Neurological Study,” to be published Dec. 1 and now on early preview in the Journal of Neurophysiology.

The researchers studied adults who watched videos of people who suffered accidental harm (such as being hit with a golf club) and intentional harm (such as being struck with a baseball bat). While watching the videos, brain activity was collected with equipment that accurately maps responses in different regions of the brain and importantly, the timing between these regions. The technique is known as high-density, event-related potentials technology.

The intentional harm sequence produced a response in the brain almost instantly. The study showed that within 60 milliseconds, the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (also known as TPJ area), located in the back of the brain, was first activated, with different activity depending on whether the harm was intentional or accidental. It was followed in quick succession by the amygdala, often linked with emotion, and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (180 milliseconds), the portion of the brain that plays a critical role in moral decision-making.

There was no such response in the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex when the harm was accidental.

Filed under brain brain activity moral decision amygdala ventromedial prefrontal cortex neuroscience psychology science

  1. schizo321437 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. grand-j-ai reblogged this from anetteslife
  3. anetteslife reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. bent-over-backwards reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. ladypandora9 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    The ever Incredible Brain
  6. smallandmightylove reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. dysentaryalex reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  8. woahscience reblogged this from crotchsweat
  9. notaparagon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. ayellowhippo reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Reblogged by ‘The Big Head’ //ayellowhippo.tumblr.com/
  11. haloaroundyourfinger reblogged this from leejax
  12. leejax reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. rebirthsociety reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    ∆ - Emotion and morality is definitely something that I want to express within my film. This would be good to research...
  14. legsjet reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  15. overshootingtheatmosphere reblogged this from eyelashwisher
  16. crotchsweat reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. thenextcloud reblogged this from scienceitworksbitches
  18. ninjaruski reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Mencius demonstrates the inherent goodness of men through his appeal to an example: when a man (catchall for human)...
  19. its-a-flawedperfection reblogged this from eyelashwisher
  20. eyelashwisher reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  21. saraahlynne reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. wytchfinder reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  23. evanthelynn reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  24. pourcupinegloves reblogged this from afro-dominicano
  25. writing-sonthewall reblogged this from infectiousdiseases
  26. ahandsomestark reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  27. matthewkissingbandit reblogged this from afro-dominicano
free counters