Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

138 notes

Biology and ideology: The anatomy of politics
An increasing number of studies suggest that biology can exert a significant influence on political beliefs and behaviours. Biological factors including genes, hormone levels and neurotransmitter systems may partly shape people’s attitudes on political issues such as welfare, immigration, same-sex marriage and war. And shrewd politicians might be able to take advantage of those biological levers through clever advertisements aimed at voters’ primal emotions.
Many of the studies linking biology to politics remain controversial and unreplicated. But the overall body of evidence is growing and might alter how people think about their own and others’ political attitudes.
“People are proud of their political beliefs,” says John Hibbing, a political scientist at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. “We tend to think they’re the result of some rational responses to the world around us.” But in fact, a combination of genes and early experiences may predispose people to perceive and respond to political issues in certain ways. Recognizing that could help the public and politicians to develop more respect for those with opposing viewpoints.

Biology and ideology: The anatomy of politics

An increasing number of studies suggest that biology can exert a significant influence on political beliefs and behaviours. Biological factors including genes, hormone levels and neurotransmitter systems may partly shape people’s attitudes on political issues such as welfare, immigration, same-sex marriage and war. And shrewd politicians might be able to take advantage of those biological levers through clever advertisements aimed at voters’ primal emotions.

Many of the studies linking biology to politics remain controversial and unreplicated. But the overall body of evidence is growing and might alter how people think about their own and others’ political attitudes.

“People are proud of their political beliefs,” says John Hibbing, a political scientist at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. “We tend to think they’re the result of some rational responses to the world around us.” But in fact, a combination of genes and early experiences may predispose people to perceive and respond to political issues in certain ways. Recognizing that could help the public and politicians to develop more respect for those with opposing viewpoints.

Filed under politics biology political behavior genetics neuroscience psychology science

  1. arcanamortis reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. marked-territory reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. obiwanpapayas reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. mcnerdyninja reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. kammartinez reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. crucifictionin-space reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. peoplearebitchez reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  8. huntingdragons reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. midwayuponthisjourney reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. spookedpassage reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  11. pharmuscidea reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. youraveragetrainwreck reblogged this from squiggly-tripprrr
  13. odd-bean reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  14. mohko reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  15. valravn13 reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  16. thescienceofreality reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. spoopyqueenpersephone reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. robintheghost reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. cyatlr reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  20. foxeztrot reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  21. tlilu reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. breathemeinlike0xygen reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters