Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

67 notes


University of Toronto study demonstrates impact of adversity on early life development
It is time to put the nature versus nurture debate to rest and embrace growing evidence that it is the interaction between biology and environment in early life that influences human development, according to a series of studies recently published in a special edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
"Biologists used to think that our differences are pre-programmed in our genes, while psychologists argued that babies are born with a blank slate and their experience writes on it to shape them into the adults they become. Instead, the important question to be asking is, ‘How is our experience in early life getting embedded in our biology?’" says University of Toronto behavioural geneticist Marla Sokolowski. She is co-editor of the PNAS special edition titled "Biological Embedding of Early Social Adversity: From Fruit Flies to Kindergarteners" along with professors Tom Boyce (University of British Columbia) and Gene Robinson (University of Illinois).
Sokolowski, who is a University Professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology (EEB), the inaugural academic director of Uof T’s Fraser Mustard Institute for Human Development and co-director of the Experience-based Brain and Biological Development Program (EBBD) at the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) says that relatively little is known about the gene-environment interplay that underlies the impact of early life adversity on adult health and behaviour.
In one of the studies in the series, Sokolowski and her colleagues found that chronic food deprivation and lack of adequate nutrition in the early life of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster had significant impact on adult behaviour and quality of life. Fruit flies are especially useful for genetic studies because they share a surprising number of qualities with humans, are inexpensive to care for and reproduce rapidly, allowing for several generations to be studied in just a few months.

University of Toronto study demonstrates impact of adversity on early life development

It is time to put the nature versus nurture debate to rest and embrace growing evidence that it is the interaction between biology and environment in early life that influences human development, according to a series of studies recently published in a special edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

"Biologists used to think that our differences are pre-programmed in our genes, while psychologists argued that babies are born with a blank slate and their experience writes on it to shape them into the adults they become. Instead, the important question to be asking is, ‘How is our experience in early life getting embedded in our biology?’" says University of Toronto behavioural geneticist Marla Sokolowski. She is co-editor of the PNAS special edition titled "Biological Embedding of Early Social Adversity: From Fruit Flies to Kindergarteners" along with professors Tom Boyce (University of British Columbia) and Gene Robinson (University of Illinois).

Sokolowski, who is a University Professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology (EEB), the inaugural academic director of Uof T’s Fraser Mustard Institute for Human Development and co-director of the Experience-based Brain and Biological Development Program (EBBD) at the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) says that relatively little is known about the gene-environment interplay that underlies the impact of early life adversity on adult health and behaviour.

In one of the studies in the series, Sokolowski and her colleagues found that chronic food deprivation and lack of adequate nutrition in the early life of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster had significant impact on adult behaviour and quality of life. Fruit flies are especially useful for genetic studies because they share a surprising number of qualities with humans, are inexpensive to care for and reproduce rapidly, allowing for several generations to be studied in just a few months.

Filed under early life environment nature vs nurture experience biology neuroscience psychology science

  1. vulpezvulpez reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  2. liberalcatlady reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  3. jesstify reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    // Flourishing from adversity leaves long-lasting ripples — don’t forget that personality, traits, and habits build from...
  4. thebearstag reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. biognosis reblogged this from scientificthought
  6. lacedwithblasphemy reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  7. thecrescenteye reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  8. transposing-an-hour reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  9. paradoxicalparadigms reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. stayambitious reblogged this from whenindoubtapplymoreglitter
  11. aliche13 reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. hogjonny reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. godammitkitty reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    Obvious? Maybe. But bookmark anyway: chronic food deprivation in early life may impact adult behaviour and quality of...
  14. exquisite-gentleman reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters