Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

375 notes


Gender stereotypes and nature vs. nurture
Leading neuroscientist Professor Simon Baron Cohen will be taking part in a debate at this year’s Cambridge Festival of Ideas on whether science has been used to promote gender stereotypes.
Neuroscientists have been criticised in recent books by feminist writers such as Natasha Walter’s Living Dolls for bolstering gender stereotypes.
Simon Baron Cohen, professor of developmental psychopathology at the University of Cambridge, says critics who argue that gender difference is all a question of socialisation are in danger of oversimplifying the interaction of biology and experience. He says: “Some gender differences in the mind and behaviour may in part be the result of our biology (prenatal hormones and genes) interacting with our experience. The old nature vs. nurture debate is absurdly simplistic and a moderate position recognises the interaction of both.
He adds that he is wary of neuroscience research being used to bolster traditional gender stereotypes. He says: “The main goal of neuroscience is to understand the mind, and is certainly not to bolster traditional views.”

The aim of the Festival, which is in its fourth year, is to celebrate the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Most of the over 170 events running during the Festival are free, but some debates may need to be prebooked.
More information: www.cam.ac.uk/festivalofideas *Gender differences: nature vs nurture takes place from 7.30-9pm at the Babbage Theatre, Downing Street on 30 October.

Gender stereotypes and nature vs. nurture

Leading neuroscientist Professor Simon Baron Cohen will be taking part in a debate at this year’s Cambridge Festival of Ideas on whether science has been used to promote gender stereotypes.

Neuroscientists have been criticised in recent books by feminist writers such as Natasha Walter’s Living Dolls for bolstering gender stereotypes.

Simon Baron Cohen, professor of developmental psychopathology at the University of Cambridge, says critics who argue that gender difference is all a question of socialisation are in danger of oversimplifying the interaction of biology and experience. He says: “Some gender differences in the mind and behaviour may in part be the result of our biology (prenatal hormones and genes) interacting with our experience. The old nature vs. nurture debate is absurdly simplistic and a moderate position recognises the interaction of both.

He adds that he is wary of neuroscience research being used to bolster traditional gender stereotypes. He says: “The main goal of neuroscience is to understand the mind, and is certainly not to bolster traditional views.”

The aim of the Festival, which is in its fourth year, is to celebrate the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Most of the over 170 events running during the Festival are free, but some debates may need to be prebooked.

More information: www.cam.ac.uk/festivalofideas
*Gender differences: nature vs nurture takes place from 7.30-9pm at the Babbage Theatre, Downing Street on 30 October.

Filed under brain debate gender differences neuroscience psychology social cognition stereotypes nature vs nurture science

  1. nandeyahanshin reblogged this from birdwings
  2. skeptikhaleesi reblogged this from gender-and-science and added:
    Uh, no. ”Neuroscientists have been criticised in recent books…for bolstering gender stereotypes.” Nope. It’s a bit more...
  3. angeladellamuerta reblogged this from notaparagon
  4. genzi reblogged this from gender-and-science and added:
    Bueno, bueno, dare mi opinion…si hay diferencias genéticas y todo eso me da igual ¿Qué tiene de malo ser femenino o...
  5. notaparagon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  6. gbernadon reblogged this from gender-and-science
  7. mynameisnothanna reblogged this from gender-and-science
  8. sabelmouse reblogged this from gender-and-science
  9. sheblindeduswithscience reblogged this from gender-and-science
  10. fatmermaid reblogged this from gender-and-science
  11. gender-and-science reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. alternatehypothesis reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  13. dmvidt reblogged this from scinerds
  14. frankthought reblogged this from scinerds
  15. existential-singularity reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. upthecatpunx reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. therhoynar reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  18. inifty reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  19. metaphysicist reblogged this from wescwes
  20. reachingthemoon reblogged this from ikenbot
  21. no-hope-for-fools reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  22. pink-a-blue reblogged this from likelytwisted
  23. iguessthisisme reblogged this from ikenbot
  24. idontknowmercy reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  25. angelo-saxon reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  26. cassie-ology reblogged this from scinerds and added:
    Ohhhh how I wish I could go.
  27. nonsenseshaman reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
free counters