Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

350 notes

What number is halfway between 1 and 9? Is it 5 — or 3?
Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.
Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.
In a paper that appeared online last week in the Journal of Mathematical Psychology, researchers from MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) use the techniques of information theory to demonstrate that, given certain assumptions about the natural environment and the way neural systems work, representing information logarithmically rather than linearly reduces the risk of error.

What number is halfway between 1 and 9? Is it 5 — or 3?

Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.

Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.

In a paper that appeared online last week in the Journal of Mathematical Psychology, researchers from MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) use the techniques of information theory to demonstrate that, given certain assumptions about the natural environment and the way neural systems work, representing information logarithmically rather than linearly reduces the risk of error.

Filed under brain sensory perception information theory Weber–Fechner law neuroscience psychology science

  1. derjuliu5 reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  2. ultrafastx reblogged this from adevilsmercy
  3. adevilsmercy reblogged this from jidfurikuri
  4. djp16 reblogged this from jidfurikuri
  5. jidfurikuri reblogged this from we-are-star-stuff
  6. madamekafufski reblogged this from saladsandwich
  7. desiderata-of-happiness reblogged this from alliterativealec
  8. seachellebake reblogged this from thedarkprinceofanal
  9. thedarkprinceofanal reblogged this from hopeisinfectious
  10. antitau reblogged this from saladsandwich
  11. titchmoore reblogged this from alliterativealec
  12. alliterativealec reblogged this from saladsandwich
  13. hopeisinfectious reblogged this from saladsandwich
  14. saladsandwich reblogged this from neuronsandneutrons
  15. gno-sis reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  16. catsgrass reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  17. sandrakoala reblogged this from spiktacular
  18. spiktacular reblogged this from aperture-inc
  19. thecraftychemist reblogged this from thejavaman and added:
    Very strange, I feel I’m always being told that people can’t process expoentials (the most common excuse for people not...
  20. thejavaman reblogged this from astrofissionchips
  21. file27 reblogged this from astrofissionchips
  22. astrofissionchips reblogged this from aperture-inc
  23. chizukurowassan reblogged this from minuszot
  24. liointrouble reblogged this from neuronsandneutrons
  25. dylanbigdaddy reblogged this from aperture-inc
  26. alphaexperimental reblogged this from mage-of-rage and added:
    That’s what’s between and 9. you only get “.5”s on even amounts of numbers
free counters