Neuroscience

Articles and news from the latest research reports.

346 notes

What number is halfway between 1 and 9? Is it 5 — or 3?
Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.
Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.
In a paper that appeared online last week in the Journal of Mathematical Psychology, researchers from MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) use the techniques of information theory to demonstrate that, given certain assumptions about the natural environment and the way neural systems work, representing information logarithmically rather than linearly reduces the risk of error.

What number is halfway between 1 and 9? Is it 5 — or 3?

Ask adults from the industrialized world what number is halfway between 1 and 9, and most will say 5. But pose the same question to small children, or people living in some traditional societies, and they’re likely to answer 3.

Cognitive scientists theorize that that’s because it’s actually more natural for humans to think logarithmically than linearly: 30 is 1, and 32 is 9, so logarithmically, the number halfway between them is 31, or 3. Neural circuits seem to bear out that theory. For instance, psychological experiments suggest that multiplying the intensity of some sensory stimuli causes a linear increase in perceived intensity.

In a paper that appeared online last week in the Journal of Mathematical Psychology, researchers from MIT’s Research Laboratory of Electronics (RLE) use the techniques of information theory to demonstrate that, given certain assumptions about the natural environment and the way neural systems work, representing information logarithmically rather than linearly reduces the risk of error.

Filed under brain sensory perception information theory Weber–Fechner law neuroscience psychology science

  1. adriftinthecosmos reblogged this from jidfurikuri
  2. jidfurikuri reblogged this from we-are-star-stuff
  3. madamekafufski reblogged this from spacejogger
  4. desiderata-of-happiness reblogged this from alliterativealec
  5. davidroseofficial reblogged this from hopeisinfectious
  6. antitau reblogged this from spacejogger
  7. titchmoore reblogged this from alliterativealec
  8. alliterativealec reblogged this from spacejogger
  9. hopeisinfectious reblogged this from spacejogger
  10. spacejogger reblogged this from neuronsandneutrons
  11. catpeas reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. getoffmyblogredditplz reblogged this from spiktacular
  13. spiktacular reblogged this from aperture-inc
  14. thecraftychemist reblogged this from thejavaman and added:
    Very strange, I feel I’m always being told that people can’t process expoentials (the most common excuse for people not...
  15. chizukurowassan reblogged this from minuszot
  16. liointrouble reblogged this from neuronsandneutrons
  17. dylanbigdaddy reblogged this from aperture-inc
  18. crownanother reblogged this from mage-of-rage and added:
    That’s what’s between and 9. you only get “.5”s on even amounts of numbers
  19. theblackstaratnight reblogged this from aperture-inc
  20. iaskforpleasurefirst reblogged this from aperture-inc
  21. writerwasted reblogged this from aperture-inc
  22. thegrassholeshow reblogged this from aperture-inc
free counters