Abnormal Brain Development in Fetuses of Obese Women
In a study to be presented on February 15 between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. PST, at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine’s annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting ™, in San Francisco, California, researchers from Tufts Medical Center will present findings showing the effects of maternal obesity on a fetus, specifically in the development of the brain.
The study, conducted at the Mother Infant Research Institute (MIRI) at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Mass., looked at the fetal development of 16 pregnant women, eight obese and eight lean, to see what effects maternal obesity had on fetal gene expression. Researchers have found that fetuses of obese women had differences in gene expression as early as the second trimester, compared to fetuses of women who were a healthy weight. Of particular note were patterns of gene expression suggestive of abnormal brain development in fetuses of obese women.
During gestation, fetuses go through apoptosis, a developmental process of programmed cell death. However, fetuses of the obese women were observed to have decreased apoptosis, which is an important part of normal fetal neurodevelopment. Dr. Diana Bianchi, senior author of the study and executive director of MIRI, describes apoptosis as a pruning process, clearing out space for new growth.
“Women won’t be surprised to hear being obese while pregnant can lead to obesity in the child,” said Dr. Andrea Edlow, lead author of the study and fellow in Maternal-Fetal Medicine at Tufts Medical Center. “But what might surprise them is the potential effect it has on the brain development of their unborn child.”
It is too early to know the implications of their findings, but maternal obesity is a rapidly growing problem in the U.S., with one in three women being obese at conception. The conclusion of the study points to the role of gene expression studies such as this one in helping elucidate possible mechanisms for recently-described postnatal neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children of obese women, including increased rates of autism and altered hypothalamic appetite regulation.
Filed under brain development obesity maternal obesity gene expression fetal neurodevelopment science
A new type of prophylactic treatment for brain injury following prolonged epileptic seizures has been developed by Emory University School of Medicine investigators.
Status epilepticus, a persistent seizure lasting longer than 30 minutes [check this, some people say FIVE], is potentially life-threatening and leads to around 55,000 deaths each year in the United States. It can be caused by stroke, brain tumor or infection as well as inadequate control of epilepsy. Physicians or paramedics now treat status epilepticus by administering an anticonvulsant or general anesthesia, which stops the seizures.
Researchers at Emory have been looking for something different: anti-inflammatory compounds that can be administered after acute status epilepticus has ended to reduce damage to the brain. They have discovered a potential lead compound that can reduce mortality when given to mice after drug-induced seizures.
The results are scheduled for publication Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition.
"For adults who experience a period of status epilepticus longer than one hour, more than 30 percent die within four weeks of the event, making this a major medical problem," says Ray Dingledine, PhD, chair of the Department of Pharmacology at Emory University School of Medicine. "Medications that would reduce the severe consequences of refractory status epilepticus have been elusive. We believe we have an effective route to minimizing the brain injury caused by uncontrolled status epilepticus."
Dingledine’s laboratory has identified compounds that block the effects of prostaglandin E2, a hormone involved in processes such as fever, childbirth, digestion and blood pressure regulation. Prostaglandin E2 is also involved in the toxic inflammation in the brain arising after status epilepticus.
The first author of the paper is postdoctoral fellow Jianxiong Jiang, PhD, and the medicinal chemist largely responsible for developing the compounds is Thota Ganesh, PhD.
Jiang and colleagues induced status epilepticus in mice with the alkaloid drug pilocarpine, and gave them a compound, TG6-10-1, starting four hours later and again at 21 and 30 hours. TG6-10-1 blocks signals from EP2, one of four receptors for prostaglandin E2.
Among animals that received the EP2 blocker, 90 percent survived after one week, while 60 percent of a control group survived. The scientists also used nest-building behavior and weight loss as gauges of damage to the brain. Four days after status epilepticus, all the animals that received TG6-10-1 displayed normal nest-building, but more than a quarter of living control animals were not able to build nests. In addition, the brains of TG6-10-1-treated mice had reduced levels of inflammatory messenger proteins called cytokines, less brain injury and less breach of the blood-brain-barrier.
Consequences of refractory status epilepticus can include brain damage, difficulty breathing, abnormal heart rhythms and heart failure.
Dingledine says the first clinical test of an EP2 blocking compound would probably be as an add-on treatment for prolonged status epilepticus, several hours after seizures have ended. It could also be tested in similar situations such as subarachnoid hemorrhage, prolonged febrile seizures or medication-resistant epilepsy, he says.
Dingledine and his colleagues have a patent pending for novel technology related to this research. Under Emory policies, they are eligible to receive a portion of any royalties or fees received by Emory from this technology.
(Source: eurekalert.org)
Filed under brain tumors brain injury epileptic seizures general anesthesia neuroscience science
Visualizing Biological Networks in 4D
Every great structure, from the Empire State Building to the Golden Gate Bridge, depends on specific mechanical properties to remain strong and reliable. Rigidity—a material’s stiffness—is of particular importance for maintaining the robust functionality of everything from colossal edifices to the tiniest of nanoscale structures. In biological nanostructures, like DNA networks, it has been difficult to measure this stiffness, which is essential to their properties and functions. But scientists at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) have recently developed techniques for visualizing the behavior of biological nanostructures in both space and time, allowing them to directly measure stiffness and map its variation throughout the network.
The new method is outlined in the February 4 early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
"This type of visualization is taking us into domains of the biological sciences that we did not explore before," says Nobel Laureate Ahmed Zewail, the Linus Pauling Professor of Chemistry and professor of physics at Caltech, who coauthored the paper with Ulrich Lorenz, a postdoctoral scholar in Zewail’s lab. "We are providing the methodology to find out—directly—the stiffness of a biological network that has nanoscale properties."
Knowing the mechanical properties of DNA structures is crucial to building sturdy biological networks, among other applications. According to Zewail, this type of visualization of biomechanics in space and time should be applicable to the study of other biological nanomaterials, including the abnormal protein assemblies that underlie diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Zewail and Lorenz were able to see, for the first time, the motion of DNA nanostructures in both space and time using the four-dimensional (4D) electron microscope developed at Caltech’s Physical Biology Center for Ultrafast Science and Technology. The center is directed by Zewail, who created it in 2005 to advance understanding of the fundamental physics of chemical and biological behavior.
Filed under biological networks biological nanostructures electron microscopy biology science
Mystery disease unraveled by Stanford neurologist
At first, Marc Laderriere thought that his decreasing energy was just age catching up to him — he was about to be 50. But something about that explanation didn’t sit right.
"At one point, one of my doctors said, ‘This is definitely a little strange. I don’t know what you have, but it could be nerves,’" Laderriere recalled.
He was experiencing a set of symptoms that were unusual but did not strike him as significant: Hot weather sapped his strength and made him dizzy, but he was sweating less. In cool weather, he never got goose bumps.
As a young man growing up in France, Laderriere had always been active. “I did a lot of skiing, a lot of swimming,” he said. When he came to work in the United States, as a director of wine sales for the Vina Robles Winery & Vineyards in Paso Robles, he said he became a workaholic. “I completely accepted that way of life,” he said.
The more he traveled for his job, the less time and attention he paid to his health until he recognized, with some discomfort, that he was not in such great shape any more. He knew he should add exercise to his daily routine, but the fatigue he felt was overwhelming.
Laderriere, who lives in Paso Robles, started first with visits to local doctors. He had a variety of standard tests, with the thought that he might have developed diabetes. That was not the case. When one physician suggested it could be nerves, he went to see a local neurologist who sent him back to his original physician, still without a diagnosis. His symptoms continued and, finally, a local doctor suggested Stanford Hospital & Clinics.
During his first visit, he met with a group of physicians who asked him a lot questions,. “They were picking my brain,” he said, “asking me, ‘What’s wrong with this?’ I did not think to mention to them that I wasn’t sweating, but my wife was with me and she did. One of the doctors said, ‘Hmm, I think you may want to meet Dr. Jaradeh.’”
Read more
Filed under blood pressure nerves autonomic system autonomic disorder neurological disorders science
Vascular brain injury from conditions such as high blood pressure and stroke are greater risk factors for cognitive impairment among non-demented older people than is the deposition of the amyloid plaques in the brain that long have been implicated in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, a study by researchers at the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center at UC Davis has found.
Published online early today in JAMA Neurology (formerly Archives of Neurology), the study found that vascular brain injury had by far the greatest influence across a range of cognitive domains, including higher-level thinking and the forgetfulness of mild cognitive decline.
The researchers also sought to determine whether there was a correlation between vascular brain injury and the deposition of beta amyloid (Αβ) plaques, thought to be an early and important marker of Alzheimer’s disease, said Bruce Reed, associate director of the UC Davis Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center in Martinez, Calif. They also sought to decipher what effect each has on memory and executive functioning.
“We looked at two questions,” said Reed, professor in the Department of Neurology at UC Davis. “The first question was whether those two pathologies correlate to each other, and the simple answer is ‘no.’ Earlier research, conducted in animals, has suggested that having a stroke causes more beta amyloid deposition in the brain. If that were the case, people who had more vascular brain injury should have higher levels of beta amyloid. We found no evidence to support that.”
"The second,” Reed continued, “was whether higher levels of cerebrovascular disease or amyloid plaques have a greater impact on cognitive function in older, non-demented adults. Half of the study participants had abnormal levels of beta amyloid and half vascular brain injury, or infarcts. It was really very clear that the amyloid had very little effect, but the vascular brain injury had distinctly negative effects.”
“The more vascular brain injury the participants had, the worse their memory and the worse their executive function – their ability to organize and problem solve,” Reed said.
The research was conducted in 61 male and female study participants who ranged in age from 65 to 90 years old, with an average age of 78. Thirty of the participants were clinically “normal,” 24 were cognitively impaired and seven were diagnosed with dementia, based on cognitive testing. The participants had been recruited from Northern California between 2007 to 2012.
The study participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ― to measure vascular brain injury ― and positron emission tomography (PET) scans to measure beta amyloid deposition: markers of the two most common pathologies that affect the aging brain. Vascular brain injury appears as brain infarcts and “white matter hyperintensities” in MRI scans, areas of the brain that appear bright white.
The study found that both memory and executive function correlated negatively with brain infarcts, especially infarcts in cortical and sub-cortical gray matter. Although infarcts were common in this group, the infarcts varied greatly in size and location, and many had been clinically silent. The level of amyloid in the brain did not correlate with either changes in memory or executive function, and there was no evidence that amyloid interacted with infarcts to impair thinking.
Reed said the study is important because there’s an enormous amount of interest in detecting Alzheimer’s disease at its earliest point, before an individual exhibits clinical symptoms. It’s possible to conduct a brain scan and detect beta amyloid in the brain, and that is a very new development, he said.
“The use of this diagnostic tool will become reasonably widely available within the next couple of years, so doctors will be able to detect whether an older person has abnormal levels of beta amyloid in the brain. So it’s very important to understand the meaning of a finding of beta amyloid deposition,” Reed said.
“What this study says is that doctors should think about this in a little more complicated way. They should not forget about cerebrovascular disease, which is also very common in this age group and could also cause cognitive problems. Even if a person has amyloid plaques, those plaques may not be the cause of their mild cognitive symptoms.”
(Source: ucdmc.ucdavis.edu)
Filed under amyloid plaques cognitive decline cognitive impairment executive function brain injury neuroscience science
Genes linked to autism and schizophrenia are only switched on during the early stages of brain development, according to a collaboration between researchers at Imperial College London, the University of Oxford and King’s College London.

This new study adds to the evidence that autism and schizophrenia are neurodevelopmental disorders, a term describing conditions that originate during early brain development.
The researchers studied gene expression in the brains of mice throughout their development, from 15-day old embryos to adults, and their results are published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The research focused on cells in the ‘subplate’, a region of the brain where the first neurons (nerve cells) develop. Subplate neurons are essential to brain development, and provide the earliest connections within the brain.
'The subplate provides the scaffolding required for a brain to grow, so is important to consider when studying brain development,' says Professor Zoltán Molnár, senior author of the paper from the University of Oxford, 'Looking at the pyramids in Egypt today doesn't tell us how they were actually built. Studying adult brains is like looking at the pyramids today, but by studying the developing brains we are able to see the transient scaffolding that has been used to construct it.'
The study shows that certain genes linked to autism and schizophrenia are only active in the subplate during specific stages of development. The data analysis was designed by Dr Enrico Petretto, Senior Lecturer in Genomic Medicine at Imperial College London. Dr Petretto said: “We looked at the full network of genes in the brain to identify which pathways play a role in early brain development. This allowed us to find coherent clusters of genes previously associated with susceptibility to autism spectrum disorders or schizophrenia. These results provide a unique resource for our understanding of how gene behaviour changes in the mouse subplate from the early embryonic stage to adulthood. This means we are better equipped to investigate how the gene network changes in the developing brain and identify any links with neurodevelopmental disorders.”
The team was able to map gene activity in full detail thanks to these new methods which allowed them to dissect and profile gene expression from small numbers of cells. This also enabled them to identify the different populations of subplate neurons more accurately.
Professor Hugh Perry, chair of the Medical Research Council’s Neuroscience and Mental Health Board, said: “By being able to pinpoint common genetic factors for neurological conditions such as autism and schizophrenia, scientists are able to understand an important part of the story as to why things go awry as our brains develop. The Medical Research Council’s commitment to a broad portfolio of neuroscience and mental health research places us in a unique position to respond to the challenge of mental ill health and its relationship with physical health and wellbeing.”
(Source: www3.imperial.ac.uk)
Filed under brain development nerve cells neurodevelopmental disorders gene expression autism schizophrenia neuroscience science
A discovery using stem cells from a patient with motor neurone disease could help research into treatments for the condition.
The study used a patient’s skin cells to create motor neurons - nerve cells that control muscle activity - and the cells that support them called astrocytes.
Astrocyte death
Researchers studied these two types of cells in the laboratory. They found that a protein expressed by abnormalities in a gene linked to motor neurone disease, which is called TDP-43, caused the astrocytes to die.
The study, led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by the Motor Neurone Disease Association, provides fresh insight into the mechanisms involved in the disease.
Gene mutation
Although TDP-43 mutations are a rare cause of motor neurone disease (MND), scientists are especially interested in the gene because in the vast majority of MND patients, TDP-43 protein (made by the TDP-43 gene) forms pathological clumps inside motor neurons.
Motor neurones die in MND leading to paralysis and early death.
This study shows for the first time that abnormal TDP-43 protein causes death of astrocytes.
The researchers, however, found that the damaged astrocytes were not directly toxic to motor neurons.
Motor neurone disease is a devastating and ultimately fatal condition, for which there is no cure or effective treatment. -Professor Siddharthan Chandran (Director of the Euan Macdonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research)
Implications
Better understanding the role of astrocytes could help to inform research into treatments for motor neurone disease (MND).
These findings, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are significant as they show that different mechanisms are at work in different types of MND.
It is not just a question of looking solely at motor neurons, but also the cells that surround them, to understand why motor neurones die. Our aim is to find ways to slow down progression of this devastating disease and ultimately develop a cure. -Professor Siddharthan Chandran (Director of the Euan Macdonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research)
(Source: ed.ac.uk)
Filed under motor neurone disease motor neurons nerve cells stem cells mutations cells neuroscience science
‘Robot’ cells answer call to arms
By thinking of cells as programmable robots, researchers at Rice University hope to someday direct how they grow into the tiny blood vessels that feed the brain and help people regain functions lost to stroke and disease.
Rice bioengineer Amina Qutub and her colleagues simulate patterns of microvasculature cell growth and compare the results with real networks grown in their lab. Eventually, they want to develop the ability to control the way these networks develop.
The results of a long study are the focus of a new paper in the Journal of Theoretical Biology.
“We want to be able to design particular capillary structures,” said Qutub, an assistant professor of bioengineering based at Rice’s BioScience Research Collaborative. “In our computer model, the cells are miniature adaptive robots that respond to each other, respond to their environment and pattern into unique structures that parallel what we see in the lab.”
When brain cells are deprived of oxygen – a condition called hypoxia that can lead to strokes – they pump out growth factor proteins that signal endothelial cells. Those cells, which line the interior of blood vessels, are prompted to branch off as capillaries in a process called angiogenesis to bring oxygen to starved neurons.
How these new vessels form networks and the shapes they take are of great interest to bioengineers who want to improve blood flow to parts of the brain by regenerating the microvasculature.
“The problem, especially as we age, is that we become less able to grow these blood vessels,” Qutub said. “At the same time, we’re at higher risk for strokes and neurodegenerative diseases. If we can understand how to guide the vessel structures and help them self-repair, we are a step closer to aiding treatment.”
Filed under brain cells blood vessels hypoxia neurodegenerative diseases stroke medicine science
Will we ever… simulate the human brain?
A billion dollar project claims it will recreate the most complex organ in the human body in just 10 years. But detractors say it is impossible. Who is right?
For years, Henry Markram has claimed that he can simulate the human brain in a computer within a decade. On 23 January 2013, the European Commission told him to prove it. His ambitious Human Brain Project (HBP) won one of two ceiling-shattering grants from the EC to the tune of a billion euros, ending a two-year contest against several other grandiose projects. Can he now deliver? Is it even possible to build a computer simulation of the most powerful computer in the world – the 1.4-kg (3 lb) cluster of 86 billion neurons that sits inside our skulls?
The very idea has many neuroscientists in an uproar, and the HBP’s substantial budget, awarded at a tumultuous time for research funding, is not helping. The common refrain is that the brain is just too complicated to simulate, and our understanding of it is at too primordial a stage.
Then, there’s Markram’s strategy. Neuroscientists have built computer simulations of neurons since the 1950s, but the vast majority treat these cells as single abstract points. Markram says he wants to build the cells as they are – gloriously detailed branching networks, full of active genes and electrical activity. He wants to simulate them down to their ion channels – the molecular gates that allow neurons to build up a voltage by shuttling charged particles in and out of their membrane borders. He wants to represent the genes that switch on and off inside them. He wants to simulate the 3,000 or so synapses that allow neurons to communicate with their neighbours.
Erin McKiernan, who builds computer models of single neurons, is a fan of this bottom-up approach. “Really understanding what’s happening at a fundamental level and building up – I generally agree with that,” she says. “But I tend to disagree with the time frame. [Markram] said that in 10 years, we could have a fully simulated brain, but I don’t think that’ll happen.”
Even building McKiernan’s single-neuron models is a fiendishly complicated task. “For many neurons, we don’t understand well the complement of ion channels within them, how they work together to produce electrical activity, how they change over development or injury,” she says. “At the next level, we have even less knowledge about how these cells connect, or how they’re constantly reaching out, retracting or changing their strength.” It’s ignorance all the way down.
“For sure, what we have is a tiny, tiny fraction of what we need,” says Markram. Worse still, experimentally mapping out every molecule, cell and connection is completely unfeasible in terms of cost, technical requirements and motivation. But he argues that building a unified model is the only way to unite our knowledge, and to start filling in the gaps in a focused way. By putting it all together, we can use what we know to predict what we don’t, and to refine everything on the fly as new insights come in.
Continue reading
Filed under brain brain simulation Human Brain Project neuroscience science
Why we’re building a €1 billion model of a human brain
We want to reach a unified understanding of the brain and the simulation on a supercomputer is the tool. Today you have neuroscientists working on a genetic, behavioural or cognitive level, and then you have informaticians, chemists and mathematicians. They all have their own understanding of how the brain functions and is structured. How do you get them all around the same table? We think of the project as like a CERN for the brain. The model is our way of bringing everyone, and our understanding, together.
Filed under Human Brain Project Henry Markram brain brain simulation neuroscience science