Scientists Coax Brain to Regenerate Cells Lost in Huntington’s Disease

Researchers have been able to mobilize the brain’s native stem cells to replenish a type of neuron lost in Huntington’s disease. In the study, which appears today in the journal Cell Stem Cell, the scientists were able to both trigger the production of new neurons in mice with the disease and show that the new cells successfully integrated into the brain’s existing neural networks, dramatically extending the survival of the treated mice.

“This study demonstrates the feasibility of a completely new concept to treat Huntington’s disease, by recruiting the brain’s endogenous neural stem cells to regenerate cells lost to the disease,” said University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) neurologist Steve Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., co-director of Rochester’s Center for Translational Neuromedicine.

Huntington’s disease is an inherited neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of a specific cell type called the medium spiny neuron, a cell that is critical to motor control. The disease, which affects some 30,000 people in the U.S., results in involuntary movements, problems with coordination, and, ultimately, in cognitive decline and depression. There is currently no way to slow or modify this fatal disease.

For Goldman, the idea behind his strategy to treat the disease emerged from his decades-long study of neural plasticity in canaries. Songbirds like canaries have intrigued biologists because of their ability – unique in the animal kingdom – to lay down new neurons in the adult brain. This process, called adult neurogenesis, was first discovered by Goldman and Fernando Nottebohm of the Rockefeller University in the early 1980s, when the two realized that when learning new songs new neurons were added to regions of the bird’s brain responsible for vocal control.

“Our work with canaries essentially provided us with the information we needed to understand how to add new neurons to adult brain tissue,” said Goldman. “Once we mastered how this happened in birds, we set about how to replicate the process in the adult mammalian brain.”

Humans already possess the ability to create new neurons. Goldman’s lab demonstrated in the 1990s that a font of neuronal precursor cells exist in the lining of the ventricles, structures found in the core of the human brain. In early development, these cells are actively producing neurons. However, shortly after birth the neural stem cells stop generating neurons and instead produce glia, a family of support cells that pervade the central nervous system. Some parts of the human brain continue to produce neurons into adulthood, the most prominent example is the hippocampus where memories are formed and stored. But in the striatum, the region of the brain that is devastated by Huntington’s disease, this capability is “switched off” in adulthood.

Goldman and his team spent the past decade attempting to unravel the precise chemical signaling responsible for instructing neural stem cells when to create neurons and when to create glia cells. One of the most critical clues came directly from the earlier research with canaries. In the part of the bird’s brain were new songs are acquired and neurons added, the scientists observed the regulated expression of a protein called brain derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF.  When the production of this protein is triggered, the local neural stem cells are instructed to produce neurons.

At the same time, the scientists also realized that they had to simultaneously suppress the bias of these stem cells to produce glia. They found that when BDNF was combined with another molecule called noggin – a protein that inhibits the chemical pathway that dictates the creation of glial cells – they could successfully switch the stem cell’s molecular machinery over to the production of neurons.

The next challenge was how to deliver these two proteins – BDNF and noggin – precisely and in a sustained fashion to the area of the brain involved in Huntington’s disease. To do so, they partnered with scientists at the University of Iowa to modify a viral gene therapeutic, called an adeno-associated virus, to deliver the necessary molecular instructions to the neural stem cells.

The virus infected the target cells in the brains of mice with Huntington’s disease and triggered the sustained over-expression of both BDNF and noggin. This, in turn, activated the neighboring neural stem cells which began to produce medium spiny motor neurons. The new neurons were continuously generated and migrated to the striatum, the region of the brain impacted by Huntington’s disease, where they then integrated into the existing neuronal networks. 

The researchers were able to significantly extend the survival of the treated mice, in some cases doubling their life expectancy. The researchers also devised a way to tag the new neurons and observed that the cells extended fibers to distant targets within the brain and establish electrical communication. 

After having established the ability to generate new replacement neurons in mouse models of Huntington’s disease, the researchers also demonstrated that they could replicate this technique in the brains of normal squirrel monkeys, a step that brings the research much closer to tests in humans. 

“The sustained delivery of BDNF and noggin into the adult brain was clearly associated with both increased neurogenesis and delayed disease progression,” said Goldman. “We believe that our data suggest the feasibility of this process as a viable therapeutic strategy for Huntington’s disease.”

Evidence from a quiet MRI: Breastfeeding benefits babies’ brains

A study using brain images from “quiet” MRI machines adds to the growing body of evidence that breastfeeding improves brain development in infants. Breastfeeding alone produced better brain development than a combination of breastfeeding and formula, which produced better development than formula alone.

A new study by researchers from Brown University finds more evidence that breastfeeding is good for babies’ brains.

The study made use of specialized, baby-friendly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to look at the brain growth in a sample of children under the age of 4. The research found that by age 2, babies who had been breastfed exclusively for at least three months had enhanced development in key parts of the brain compared to children who were fed formula exclusively or who were fed a combination of formula and breastmilk. The extra growth was most pronounced in parts of the brain associated with language, emotional function, and cognition, the research showed.

This isn’t the first study to suggest that breastfeeding aids babies’ brain development. Behavioral studies have previously associated breastfeeding with better cognitive outcomes in older adolescents and adults. But this is the first imaging study that looked for differences associated with breastfeeding in the brains of very young and healthy children, said Sean Deoni, assistant professor of engineering at Brown and the study’s lead author.

“We wanted to see how early these changes in brain development actually occur,” Deoni said. “We show that they’re there almost right off the bat.”

The findings are in press in the journal NeuroImage and available now online.

Deoni leads Brown’s Advanced Baby Imaging Lab. He and his colleagues use quiet MRI machines that image babies’ brains as they sleep. The MRI technique Deoni has developed looks at the microstructure of the brain’s white matter, the tissue that contains long nerve fibers and helps different parts of the brain communicate with each other. Specifically, the technique looks for amounts of myelin, the fatty material that insulates nerve fibers and speeds electrical signals as they zip around the brain.

Deoni and his team looked at 133 babies ranging in ages from 10 months to four years. All of the babies had normal gestation times, and all came from families with similar socioeconomic statuses. The researchers split the babies into three groups: those whose mothers reported they exclusively breastfed for at least three months, those fed a combination of breastmilk and formula, and those fed formula alone. The researchers compared the older kids to the younger kids to establish growth trajectories in white matter for each group.

The study showed that the exclusively breastfed group had the fastest growth in myelinated white matter of the three groups, with the increase in white matter volume becoming substantial by age 2. The group fed both breastmilk and formula had more growth than the exclusively formula-fed group, but less than the breastmilk-only group.

“We’re finding the difference [in white matter growth] is on the order of 20 to 30 percent, comparing the breastfed and the non-breastfed kids,” said Deoni. “I think it’s astounding that you could have that much difference so early.”

Deoni and his team then backed up their imaging data with a set of basic cognitive tests on the older children. Those tests found increased language performance, visual reception, and motor control performance in the breastfed group.

The study also looked at the effects of the duration of breastfeeding. The researchers compared babies who were breastfed for more than a year with those breastfed less than a year, and found significantly enhanced brain growth in the babies who were breastfed longer — especially in areas of the brain dealing with motor function.

Deoni says the findings add to a substantial body of research that finds positive associations between breastfeeding and children’s brain health.

“I think I would argue that combined with all the other evidence, it seems like breastfeeding is absolutely beneficial,” he said.

Compulsive no more

MIT study sheds light on what causes compulsive behavior, could improve OCD treatments.

By activating a brain circuit that controls compulsive behavior, MIT neuroscientists have shown that they can block a compulsive behavior in mice — a result that could help researchers develop new treatments for diseases such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette’s syndrome.

About 1 percent of U.S. adults suffer from OCD, and patients usually receive antianxiety drugs or antidepressants, behavioral therapy, or a combination of therapy and medication. For those who do not respond to those treatments, a new alternative is deep brain stimulation, which delivers electrical impulses via a pacemaker implanted in the brain.

For this study, the MIT team used optogenetics to control neuron activity with light. This technique is not yet ready for use in human patients, but studies such as this one could help researchers identify brain activity patterns that signal the onset of compulsive behavior, allowing them to more precisely time the delivery of deep brain stimulation.

“You don’t have to stimulate all the time. You can do it in a very nuanced way,” says Ann Graybiel, an Institute Professor at MIT, a member of MIT’s McGovern Institute for Brain Research and the senior author of a Science paper describing the study.

The paper’s lead author is Eric Burguière, a former postdoc in Graybiel’s lab who is now at the Brain and Spine Institute in Paris. Other authors are Patricia Monteiro, a research affiliate at the McGovern Institute, and Guoping Feng, the James W. and Patricia T. Poitras Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and a member of the McGovern Institute.

Controlling compulsion

In earlier studies, Graybiel has focused on how to break normal habits; in the current work, she turned to a mouse model developed by Feng to try to block a compulsive behavior. The model mice lack a particular gene, known as Sapap3, that codes for a protein found in the synapses of neurons in the striatum — a part of the brain related to addiction and repetitive behavioral problems, as well as normal functions such as decision-making, planning and response to reward.

For this study, the researchers trained mice whose Sapap3 gene was knocked out to groom compulsively at a specific time, allowing the researchers to try to interrupt the compulsion. To do this, they used a Pavlovian conditioning strategy in which a neutral event (a tone) is paired with a stimulus that provokes the desired behavior — in this case, a drop of water on the mouse’s nose, which triggers the mouse to groom. This strategy was based on therapeutic work with OCD patients, which uses this kind of conditioning.

After several hundred trials, both normal and knockout mice became conditioned to groom upon hearing the tone, which always occurred just over a second before the water drop fell. However, after a certain point their behaviors diverged: The normal mice began waiting until just before the water drop fell to begin grooming. This type of behavior is known as optimization, because it prevents the mice from wasting unnecessary effort.

This behavior optimization never appeared in the knockout mice, which continued to groom as soon as they heard the tone, suggesting that their ability to suppress compulsive behavior was impaired.

The researchers suspected that failed communication between the striatum, which is related to habits, and the neocortex, the seat of higher functions that can override simpler behaviors, might be to blame for the mice’s compulsive behavior. To test this idea, they used optogenetics, which allows them to control cell activity with light by engineering cells to express light-sensitive proteins.

When the researchers stimulated light-sensitive cortical cells that send messages to the striatum at the same time that the tone went off, the knockout mice stopped their compulsive grooming almost totally, yet they could still groom when the water drop came. The researchers suggest that this cure resulted from signals sent from the cortical neurons to a very small group of inhibitory neurons in the striatum, which silence the activity of neighboring striatal cells and cut off the compulsive behavior.

“Through the activation of this pathway, we could elicit behavior inhibition, which appears to be dysfunctional in our animals,” Burguière says.

The researchers also tested the optogenetic intervention in mice as they groomed in their cages, with no conditioning cues. During three-minute periods of light stimulation, the knockout mice groomed much less than they did without the stimulation.

Scott Rauch, president and psychiatrist-in-chief of McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass., says the MIT study “opens the door to a universe of new possibilities by identifying a cellular and circuitry target for future interventions.”

“This represents a major leap forward, both in terms of delineating the brain basis of pathological compulsive behavior and in offering potential avenues for new treatment approaches,” adds Rauch, who was not involved in this study.

Graybiel and Burguière are now seeking markers of brain activity that could reveal when a compulsive behavior is about to start, to help guide the further development of deep brain stimulation treatments for OCD patients.

Alzheimer’s, Schizophrenia, and Autism Now Can Be Studied With Mature Brain Cells Reprogrammed from Skin Cells

Difficult-to-study diseases such as Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, and autism now can be probed more safely and effectively thanks to an innovative new method for obtaining mature brain cells called neurons from reprogrammed skin cells. According to Gong Chen, the Verne M. Willaman Chair in Life Sciences and professor of biology at Penn State University and the leader of the research team, “the most exciting part of this research is that it offers the promise of direct disease modeling, allowing for the creation, in a Petri dish, of mature human neurons that behave a lot like neurons that grow naturally in the human brain.” Chen added that the method could lead to customized treatments for individual patients based on their own genetic and cellular information. The research will be published in the journal Stem Cell Research.

"Obviously, we don’t want to remove someone’s brain cells to experiment on, so recreating the patient’s brain cells in a Petri dish is the next best thing for research purposes and drug screening," Chen said. Chen explained that, in earlier work, scientists had found a way to reprogram skin cells from patients to become unspecialized or undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). "A pluripotent stem cell is a kind of blank slate," Chen explained. "During development, such stem cells differentiate into many diverse, specialized cell types, such as a muscle cell, a brain cell, or a blood cell. So, after generating iPSCs from skin cells, researchers then can culture them to become brain cells, or neurons, which can be studied safely in a Petri dish."

Now, in their new research, Chen and his team have found a way to differentiate iPSCs into mature human neurons much more effectively, generating cells that behave similarly to neurons in the brain. Chen explained that, in their natural environment, neurons are always found in close proximity to star-shaped cells called astrocytes, which are abundant in the brain and help neurons to function properly. “Because neurons are adjacent to astrocytes in the brain, we predicted that this direct physical contact might be an integral part of neuronal growth and health,” Chen explained.

To test this hypothesis, Chen and his colleagues began by culturing iPSC-derived neural stem cells, which are stem cells that have the potential to become neurons. These cells were cultured on top of a one-cell-thick layer of astrocytes so that the two cell types were physically touching each other.

"We found that these neural stem cells cultured on astrocytes differentiated into mature neurons much more effectively," Chen said, contrasting them with other neural stem cells that were cultured alone in a Petri dish. "It was almost as if the astrocytes were cheering the stem cells on, telling them what to do, and helping them fulfill their destiny to become neurons."

To demonstrate the superiority of the neurons grown next to astrocytes, Chen and his co-authors used an electrophysiology recording technique to show that the cells grown on astrocytes had many more synaptic events — signals sent out from one nerve cell to the others. In another experiment, after growing the neural stem cells next to astrocytes for just one week, the researchers showed that the newly differentiated neurons start to fire action potentials — the rapid electrical excitation signal that occurs in all neurons in the brain. In a final test, the team members added human neural stem cells to a mixture with mouse neurons. “We found that, after just one week, there was a lot of ‘cross-talk’ between the mouse neurons and the human neurons,” Chen said. He explained that “cross-talk” occurs when one neuron contacts its neighbors and releases a chemical called a neurotransmitter to modulate its neighbor’s activity.

"Previous researchers could only obtain brain cells from deceased patients who had suffered from diseases such as Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, and autism," Chen said. "Now, researchers can take skin cells from living patients — a safe and minimally invasive procedure — and convert them into brain cells that mimic the activity of the patient’s own brain cells." Chen added that, by using this method, researchers also can figure out how a particular drug will affect a particular patient’s own brain cells, without needing the patient to try the drug — eliminating the risk of serious side effects. "The patient can be his or her own guinea pig for the design of his or her own treatment, without having to be experimented on directly," Chen said.

Balancing mitochondrial dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease

Many diseases are multifactorial and can not be understood by simple molecular associations alone. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with toxic transformations in two classes of protein,amyloid beta and tau, but they do not explain the full underlying pathology. On the cellular scale, much of the real-time morphological changes in neurons can be attributed to their underlying mitochondrial dynamics—namely fission, fusion, and the motions between these events. Last year, researchers from Harvard Medical School made the intriguing discovery that alterations in tau could lead to a doubling in the length of mitochondria. This week, they published a review article in Trends in Neuroscience, in which they seek to explain the primary features of AD in terms of mitochondrial dynamics.

Together with a collaborator from the Queensland Brain Institute, the Harvard researchers arrive at the conclusion that, like many other neurological diseases, AD is fundamentally an energy problem. While some proteins, like APOE-ɛ4 can predispose one to AD, point defects in individual proteins can not account for AD in the same way that a single alteration in hemoglobin leads to sickle cell disease. Attempts to assign casual relations to the complex interactions of tau or amyloid, with hundreds of other proteins inside neurons have frequently served to cloud, rather than simplify the AD story.

In years gone by, it was possible to publish a paper about how phosphorylation at certain sites on proteins, like tau, could lead to any number of downstream events. Tau is one of many proteins that control the assembly and stability of microtubules, critical structures that are among those compromised in AD. The problem now, is that we know tau comes in so many flavors—it is a big family of different isoforms with different properties depending on how they are processed. As far as simple phosphorylation, tau has been found to have 79 potential sites, with at least 30 of them normally phosphorylated.

A welcome simplification to this situation of compounding molecular complexity, is that many pathways converge onto convenient pre-existing packets of time, space, and predictable molecular structure—the mitochondria. As opposed to massive cell-wide molecular accounting, describing a few sub-cellular morphological features may be a more tractable approach not only to capture disease etiology, but perhaps to treat it.

To this end, the researchers apply existing knowledge regarding some of the molecular players in AD, to a few of the well-established control points in mitochondrial dynamics. State transitions between fission and fusion are, at the moment at least, characterized by only a small handful of proteins. This simple formula might be prescribed as the following: molecular pathway locally effects the organelle dynamics, then, the dynamic behavior of organelle accounts for the disease. The imposition of this middleman can potentially simplify much of the vast body of fact and conjecture associated with the disease.

The elongation of mitochondria by tau can be caused by increasing fusion, decreasing fission, or both. One function of tau is to stabilize F-actin networks which prevents a key fission protein from ever reaching the mitochondria. Elongated mitochondria do not necessarily cause AD. In fact, amyloid beta, which is concentrated inside mitochondria, has been shown to cause increased fission and decreased fusion. When the balance between fission and fusion is pushed too far in either direction, the result is bad news for neurons. If there are defects in the transport of mitochondria, as seems to be the case in many neurological diseases, their redistribution is unable to compensate for this loss of balance.

Specific disease-associated isoforms and phosphorylation states of tau can lead to AD through the loss of mitochondria in axons. In studies of AD tissue, mitochondria have been found to be preferentially redistributed to the soma. These selective localizations can take place quickly, and are therefore difficult to quantify except by live videomicroscopy. In synapses, the mitochondria have been observed to be longer lived, and to play a more critical role in calcium regulation then those elsewhere. Disruption in the normal handling of calcium has been attributed to many aspects of AD, particularly synaptic pathology.

The canonical dogma that action potentials lead to vesicle fusion and transmitter release exclusively through the entry of extracellular calcium has recently been enhanced with the understanding that mitochondria contribute significantly to the synaptic calcium cycle. While mitochondria clearly do not depolarize as rapidly as whole spiking cells,(generally when mitochondria are depolarized there is some problem) their calcium transporters operate quickly to mop up and redistribute calcium. To say that mitochondria might single-handedly initiate vesicle fusion, or for that matter minipotentials or full-blown spikes, would await future experimental corroboration.

Countless scores of papers over the years have attempted to make sense of the myriad synaptic pathways underlying memory and LTP. They might be better understood when mitochondria are viewed as the primary authors of synaptic vesicle release probability, and by implication, “spontaneous” release (vesicle fusion in the absence of a spike). As in disease states, specific pathways, structures and organelles have significant roles to play in many aspects of brain function—but causally relating the motions and dynamics of mitochondria to these phenomena now gives the broadest interpretive power.

Researchers Discover How Brain Circuits Can Become Miswired During Development

Researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College have uncovered a mechanism that guides the exquisite wiring of neural circuits in a developing brain — gaining unprecedented insight into the faulty circuits that may lead to brain disorders ranging from autism to mental retardation.

In the journal Cell, the researchers describe, for the first time, that faulty wiring occurs when RNA molecules embedded in a growing axon are not degraded after they give instructions that help steer the nerve cell. So, for example, the signal that tells the axon to turn — which should disappear after the turn is made — remains active, interfering with new signals meant to guide the axon in other directions.

The scientists say that there may be a way to use this new knowledge to fix the circuits.

"Understanding the basis of brain miswiring can help scientists come up with new therapies and strategies to correct the problem," says the study’s senior author, Dr. Samie Jaffrey, a professor in the Department of Pharmacology.

"The brain is quite ‘plastic’ and changeable in the very young, and if we know why circuits are miswired, it may be possible to correct those pathways, allowing the brain to build new, functional wiring," he says.

Disorders associated with faulty neuronal circuits include epilepsy, autism, schizophrenia, mental retardation and spasticity and movement disorders, among others.

In their study, the scientists describe a process of brain wiring that is much more dynamic than was previously known — and thus more prone to error.

Proteins Sense the Environment to Steer the Axon

During brain development, neurons have to connect to each other, which they do by extending their long axons to touch one another. Ultimately, these neurons form a circuit between the brain and the target tissue through which chemical and electrical signals are relayed. In this study, researchers investigated neurons that travel up the spinal cord into the brain. “It is very critical that axons are precisely positioned in the spinal cord,” Dr. Jaffrey says. “If they are improperly positioned, they will form the wrong connections, which can lead to signals being sent to the wrong target cells in the brain.”

The way that an axon guides and finds its proper target is through so-called growth cones located at the tips of axons. “These growth cones have the ability to sense the environment, determine where the targets are and navigate toward them. The question has always been — how do they know how to do this? Where do the instructions come from that tell them how to find their proper target?” Dr. Jaffrey says. The team found that RNA molecules embedded in the growth cone are responsible for instructing the axon to move left or right, up or down. These RNAs are translated in growth cones to produce antenna-like proteins that steer the axon like a self-guided missile.

"As a circuit is being built, RNAs in the neuron’s growth cones are mostly silent. We found that specific RNAs are only read at precise stages in order to produce the right protein needed to steer the axon at the right time. After the protein is produced, we saw that the RNA instruction is degraded and disappears," he says.

"If these RNAs do not disappear when they should, the axon does not position itself properly — it may go right instead of left — and the wiring will be incorrect and the circuit may be faulty," Dr. Jaffrey says.

RNAs have Tremendous Power over Brain Development

The research finding answers a long-standing puzzle in the quest to understand brain wiring, says Dr. Dilek Colak, a postdoctoral associate in Dr. Jaffrey’s laboratory.

"There have been a series of discoveries over the last five years showing that proteins that control RNA degradation are very important for brain development and, when they are mutated, you can have spasticity or other movement disorders," Dr. Colak says. "That has raised a major question — why would RNA degradation pathways be so critical for properly creating brain circuits?

"What we show here is that not only does RNA need to be present in growth cones to give instructions, it then also needs to be removed from the growth cones to take away those instructions at the right time," she says. "Both those processes are critical and it may explain why there are so many different brain disorders associated with ineffective RNA regulation."

"The idea that control of brain wiring is located in these RNA molecules that are constantly being dynamically turned over is something that we didn’t anticipate," Dr. Jaffrey adds. "This tells us that regulating these RNA degradation pathways could have a tremendous impact on brain development. Now we know where to look to tease apart this process when it goes awry, and to think about how we can repair it."

(Image: Chad Baker)

Mapping the Brain

Freiburg Researchers Use Signals from Natural Movements to Identify Brain Regions

Whether we run to catch a bus or reach for a pen: Activities that involve the use of muscles are related to very specific areas in the brain. Traditionally, their exact location has only been determined through electrical stimulation or unnatural, experimental tasks. A team of scientists in Freiburg has now succeeded for the first time in mapping the brain’s surface using measurements of everyday movements.
Attributing abilities to specific brain regions and identifying pathological areas is especially important in the treatment of epilepsy patients, as severe cases require removal of neural tissue. Until now, such “mapping” involved stimulating individual regions of the brain’s surface with electric currents and observing the reaction or sensation. Alternatively, patients were asked to perform the same movements again and again until the physicians isolated the corresponding patterns in brain activity. However, these methods required for the patient to cooperate and to provide detailed answers to the physicians’ questions. This is a prerequisite that small children or patients with impaired mental abilities can hardly meet, and hence there is a need for other strategies.

Scientists from the group of Dr. Tonio Ball at the Cluster of Excellence “BrainLinks-BrainTools” and the Bernstein Center Freiburg report in the current issue of NeuroImage that the brain’s natural activity during everyday movements can also be used to reliably identify the regions responsible for arm and leg movements.

The researchers examined data from epilepsy patients who had electrodes implanted under their skull prior to surgery. Using video recordings, the team captured the spontaneous movements of their patients, searching for concurrent signals of a certain frequency in the data gathered on the surface of the brain. They succeeded in creating a map of the brain’s surface for arm and leg movements that is as accurate as those created through established experimental methods.

A big hope for the team of researchers is also to gain new insights into the control of movements in the brain, as their method allows them to explore all manner of behaviors and is no longer limited to experimental conditions. Last but not least, the scientists explain that this new method of analyzing signals from the brain will contribute to the development of brain-machine interfaces that are suitable for daily use.

Weird: Nuclear Bomb Tests Reveal Adults Grow New Brain Cells

Aboveground nuclear bomb testing in the 1950s and 1960s inadvertently gave modern scientists a way to prove the adult brain regularly creates new neurons, research reveals.

Researchers used to believe that the brain changed little once it finished maturing. That view is now considered out of date, as studies have revealed how changeable — or plastic — the adult brain can be.

Much of this plasticity is related to the brain’s organization; brain cells can alter their connections and communications with other brain cells. What has been less clear is whether, and to what extent, the human brain grows brand-new neurons in adulthood.

"There was a lot in the literature showing there was neurogenesis in rodents and every animal studied," said study researcher Kirsty Spalding, a biologist at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, "But there was very little evidence of whether this happens in humans."

Tantalizing clues

Scientists had reason to believe it does. In adult mice, the hippocampus, a structure deep in the brain involved in memory and navigation, turns over cells all the time. Some of the biological markers linked to this turnover are seen in the human hippocampus. But the only direct evidence of new brain cells forming in the region came from a 1998 study in which researchers looked at the brains of five people who had been injected with a compounded called BrdU that cells take up into their DNA. (The compound was once used in experimental cancer studies, but is not used anymore for safety reasons.)

The BrdU study revealed that neurons in the hippocampuses of the participants contained the compound in their DNA, indicating these brain cells had formed after the injections. The oldest person in the study was 72, suggesting new neuron creation, known as neurogenesis, continues well into old age.

The 1998 study was the only direct evidence of such neurogenesis in the human hippocampus, however. Spalding and her colleagues wanted to change that. Ten years ago, they began a project to track the age of neurons in the human brain using an unusual tool: spare molecules left over from Cold War-era nuclear bomb tests.

Learning to love the bomb

Between 1945 and 1962, the United States conducted hundreds of aboveground nuclear bomb tests. These tests largely stopped with the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, but their effects remained in the atmosphere. The neutrons sent flying by the bombs reacted with nitrogen in the atmosphere, creating a spike in carbon 14, an isotope (or variation) of carbon.

This carbon 14, in turn, did what carbon in the atmosphere does. It combined with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, and was then taken in by plants, which use carbon dioxide in photosynthesis. Humans ate some of these plants, along with some of the animals that also ate these plants, and the carbon 14 inside ended up in their bodies.

When a cell divides, it uses this carbon 14, integrating it into the DNA of the new cells that are forming. Carbon 14 decays over time at a known rate, so scientists can pinpoint from that decay exactly when the new cells were born.

Over the past decade, Spalding and her colleagues have used the technique in a variety of cells, including fat cells, refining it along the way until it became sensitive enough to measure tiny amounts of carbon 14 in small hippocampus samples. The researchers collected samples, with family permission, from autopsies in Sweden.

They found the tantalizing 1998 evidence was correct: Human hippocampuses do grow new neurons. In fact, about a third of the brain region is subject to cell turnover, with about 700 new neurons being formed each day in each hippocampus (humans have two, a mirror-image set on either side of the brain). Hippocampus neurons die each day, too, keeping the overall number more or less in balance, with some slow loss of cells with aging, Spalding said.

This turnover occurs at a ridge in the hippocampus known as the dentate gyrus, a spot known to contribute to the formation of new memories. Researchers aren’t sure what the function of this constant renewal is, but it could relate to allowing the brain to cope with novel situations, Spalding told LiveScience.

"Neurogenesis gives a particular kind of plasticity to the brain, a cognitive flexibility," she said.

Spalding and her colleagues had used the same techniques in other regions of the brain, including the cortex, the cerebellum and the olfactory bulb, and found no evidence of newborn neurons being integrated into those areas. The researchers now plan to study whether there are any links between neurogenesis and psychiatric conditions such as depression.

The new findings are detailed in the journal Cell.

Rapid, Irregular Heartbeat May Be Linked to Problems with Memory and Thinking

People who develop a type of irregular heartbeat common in old age called atrial fibrillation may also be more likely to develop problems with memory and thinking, according to new research published in the June 5, 2013, online issue of Neurology®, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Problems with memory and thinking are common for people as they get older. Our study shows that on average, problems with memory and thinking may start earlier or get worse more quickly in people who have atrial fibrillation,” said study author Evan L. Thacker, PhD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham. “This means that heart health is an important factor related to brain health.”

The study involved people age 65 and older from four communities in the United States who were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Participants did not have a history of atrial fibrillation or stroke at the start of the study. They were followed for an average of seven years, and received a 100-point memory and thinking test every year. People who had a stroke were not included in this analysis after the stroke. Of the 5,150 participants, 552, or about 11 percent, developed atrial fibrillation during the study.

The study found that people with atrial fibrillation were more likely to experience lower memory and thinking scores at earlier ages than people with no history of atrial fibrillation. For example, from age 80 to age 85 the average score on the 100-point test went down by about 6 points for people without atrial fibrillation, but it went down by about 10 points for people with atrial fibrillation.

For participants ages 75 and older, the average rate of decline was about three to four points faster per five years of aging with atrial fibrillation compared to those without the condition.

“This suggests that on average, people with atrial fibrillation may be more likely to develop cognitive impairment or dementia at earlier ages than people with no history of atrial fibrillation,” Thacker said.

Thacker noted that scores below 78 points on the 100-point test are suggestive of dementia. People without atrial fibrillation in the study were predicted on average to score below 78 points at age 87, while people with atrial fibrillation were predicted to score below 78 points at age 85, two years earlier.

“If there is indeed a link between atrial fibrillation and memory and thinking decline, the next steps are to learn why that decline happens and how we can prevent that decline,” said Thacker.