Neuroscience
Month
A new Northwestern University study shows the power of language in infants’ ability to understand the intentions of others.
As the babies watched intently, an experimenter produced an unusual behavior—she used her forehead to turn on a light. But how did babies interpret this behavior? Did they see it as an intentional act, as something worthy of imitating? Or did they see it as a fluke? To answer this question, the experimenter gave 14-month-old infants an opportunity to play with the light themselves.
The results, based on two experiments, show that introducing a novel word for the impending novel event had a powerful effect on the infants’ tendency to imitate the behavior. Infants were more likely to imitate behavior, however unconventional, if it had been named, than if it remained unnamed, the study shows.
When the experimenter announced her unusual behavior (“I’m going to blick the light”), infants imitated her. But when she did not provide a name, they did not follow suit.
This revealed that infants as young as 14 months of age coordinate their insights about human behavior and their intuitions about human language in the service of discovering which behaviors, observed in others, are ones to imitate.
"This work shows, for the first time, that even for infants who have only just begun to ‘crack the language code,’ language promotes culturally-shared knowledge and actions – naturally, generatively and apparently effortlessly," said Sandra R. Waxman, co-author of the study and the Louis W. Menk Professor of Psychology at Northwestern.
"This is the first demonstration of how infants’ keen observational skills, when augmented by human language, heighten their acuity for ‘reading’ the underlying intentions of their ‘tutors’ (adults) and foster infants’ imitation of adults’ actions."
Waxman said absent language and its power in conveying meaning, infants don’t imitate these “strange” actions.
"This means that human language provides infants with a powerful key: it unlocks for them a broader world of social intentions," Waxman said. "We know that language, and especially the shared meaning within a linguistic community, is one of the most powerful conduits of the cultural knowledge that we humans transmit across generations."
The unconscious brain may not be able to ace an SAT test, but new research suggests that it can handle more complex language processing and arithmetic tasks than anyone has previously believed. According to these findings, just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, we may be blithely unaware of all the hard work the unconscious brain is doing.
In their experiments, researchers from Hebrew University in Israel used a cutting-edge “masking” technique to keep their test subjects from consciously perceiving certain stimuli. With this technique, known as continuous flash suppression, the researchers show a rapidly changing series of colorful patterns to just one of the subject’s eyes. The bright patterns dominate the subject’s awareness to such an extent that when researchers show less flashy material to the other eye (like words or equations), it takes several seconds before the brain consciously registers it.
This masking technique is “a game changer in the study of the unconscious,” the scientists write, “because unlike all previous methods, it gives unconscious processes ample time to engage with and operate on subliminal stimuli.”
To study the unconscious brain’s ability to process language, the researchers subliminally showed the subject short phrases that made variable amounts of sense: For example, subjects might see the phrase “I ironed coffee” or “I ironed clothes.” The researchers gradually turned up the contrast between the phrase and its background, and measured how long it took for the phrase to “pop” into the subject’s conscious awareness. As the nonsensical phrases popped sooner, the researchers hypothesize that the unconscious brain processed the sentence, found it surprising and odd, and quickly passed it along to the conscious brain for further examination.
To determine the unconscious brain’s mathematical abilities, the researchers presented a simple subtraction or addition equation (for example, “9 − 3 − 4 = “) to a subject, but took it away before it could pop into consciousness. Then they stopped the masking pattern and displayed a single number, asking the viewer to pronounce the number as soon as it registered. When the number was the answer to the subtraction equation (for example, “2”), the subject was quicker to pronounce it. The researchers argue that the viewer was “primed” to respond to that number because the unconscious brain had solved the equation. Oddly, they didn’t find the same clear effect with easier addition equations.
Research may prompt new investigations into white matter’s role in psychiatric disorders as well as connections between mood and myelin diseases, like MS
Animals that are socially isolated for prolonged periods make less myelin in the region of the brain responsible for complex emotional and cognitive behavior, researchers at the University at Buffalo and Mt. Sinai School of Medicine report in Nature Neuroscience online.
The research sheds new light on brain plasticity, the brain’s ability to adapt to environmental changes. It reveals that neurons aren’t the only brain structures that undergo changes in response to an individual’s environment and experience, according to one of the paper’s lead authors, Karen Dietz, PhD, research scientist in the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology in the UB School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences.
Dietz did the work while a postdoctoral researcher at Mt. Sinai School of Medicine; Jia Liu, PhD, a Mt. Sinai postdoctoral researcher, is the other lead author.
The paper notes that changes in the brain’s white matter, or myelin, have been seen before in psychiatric disorders, and demyelinating disorders have also had an association with depression. Recently, myelin changes were also seen in very young animals or adolescents responding to environmental changes.
"This research reveals for the first time a role for myelin in adult psychiatric disorders," Dietz says. "It demonstrates that plasticity in the brain is not restricted to neurons, but actively occurs in glial cells, such as the oligodendrocytes, which produce myelin."
Eye experts and scientists at the University of Southampton have discovered specific cells in the eye which could lead to a new procedure to treat and cure blinding eye conditions.
Led by Professor Andrew Lotery, the study found that cells called corneal limbal stromal cells, taken from the front surface of the eye have stem cell properties and could be cultured to create retinal cells.
This could lead to new treatments for eye conditions such as retinitis pigmentosa or wet age-related macular degeneration, a condition which is a common cause of loss of vision in older people and will affect around one in three people in the UK by age 70.
Furthermore the research, published in the British Journal for Ophthalmology, suggests that using corneal limbus cells would be beneficial in humans as it would avoid complications with rejection or contamination because the cells taken from the eye would be returned to the same patient.
Professor Lotery, who is also a Consultant Ophthalmologist at Southampton General Hospital, comments: “This is an important step for our research into the prevention and treatment of eye conditions and blindness.
“We were able to characterize the corneal limbal stromal cells found on the front surface of the eye and identify the precise layer in the cornea that they came from. We were then successful in culturing them in a dish to take on some of the properties of retinal cells. We are now investigating whether these cells could be taken from the front of the eye and be used to replace diseased cells in the back of the eye in the retina. If successful this would open up new and efficient ways of treating people who have blinding eye conditions.”
This is a promising discovery as the corneal limbus is one of the most accessible regions of the human eye and it represents 90 per cent of the thickness of the front eye wall. Therefore cells could be easily obtainable from this area with little risk to the patient’s eye and sight. However Professor Lotery says more research is needed to develop this approach before they are used in patients.
Scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have defined the molecular structure of an enzyme as it interacts with several proteins involved in outcomes that can influence neurodegenerative disease and insulin resistance. The enzymes in question, which play a critical role in nerve cell (neuron) survival, are among the most prized targets for drugs to treat brain disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
The study was published online ahead of print on November 8, 2012, by the journal Structure.
The new study reveals the structure of a class of enzymes called c-jun-N-terminal kinases (JNK) when bound to three peptides from different protein families; JNK is an important contributor to stress-induced apoptosis (cell death), and several studies in animal models have shown that JNK inhibition protects against neurodegeneration.
"Our findings have long-range implications for drug discovery," said TSRI Professor Philip LoGrasso, who, along with TSRI Associate Professor Kendall Nettles, led the study. "Knowing the structure of JNK bound to these proteins will allow us to make novel substrate competitive inhibitors for this enzyme with even greater specificity and hopefully less toxicity."
The scientists used what they called structure class analysis, looking at groups of structures, which revealed subtle differences not apparent looking at them individually.
"From a structural point of view, these different proteins appear to be very similar, but the biochemistry shows that the results of their binding to JNK were very different," he said.
LoGrasso and his colleagues were responsible for creating and solving the crystal structures of the three peptides (JIP1, SAB, and ATF-2) with JNK3 using a technique called x-ray crystallography, while Nettles handled much of the data analysis.
All three peptides have important effects, LoGrasso said, inducing two distinct inhibitory mechanisms—one where the peptide caused the activation loop to bind directly in the ATP pocket, and another with allosteric control (that is, using a location on the protein other than the active site). Because JNK signaling needs to be tightly controlled, even small changes in it can alter a cell’s fate.
"Solving the crystal structures of these three bound peptides gives us a clearer idea of how we can block each of these mechanisms related to cell death and survival," LoGrasso said. "You have to know their structure to know how to deal with them."
Sanford-Burnham researchers discovered that the protein appoptosin prompts neurons to commit suicide in several neurological conditions—giving them a new therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease and traumatic brain injury.
Dying neurons lead to cognitive impairment and memory loss in patients with neurodegenerative disorders–conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and traumatic brain injury. To better diagnose and treat these neurological conditions, scientists first need to better understand the underlying causes of neuronal death.
Enter Huaxi Xu, Ph.D., professor in Sanford-Burnham’s Del E. Webb Neuroscience, Aging, and Stem Cell Research Center. He and his team have been studying the protein appoptosin and its role in neurodegenerative disorders for the past several years. Appoptosin levels in the brain skyrocket in conditions like Alzheimer’s and stroke, and especially following traumatic brain injury.
Appoptosin is known for its role in helping the body make heme, the molecule that carries iron in our blood (think “hemoglobin,” which makes blood red). But what does heme have to do with dying brain cells? As Xu and his group explain in a paper they published recently in the Journal of Neuroscience, excess heme leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species, which include cell-damaging free radicals and peroxides, and triggers apoptosis, the carefully regulated process of cellular suicide. This means that more appoptosin and more heme cause neurons to die.
Not only did Xu and his team unravel this whole appoptosin-heme-neurodegeneration mechanism, but when they inhibited appoptosin in laboratory cell cultures, they noticed that the cells didn’t die. This finding suggests that appoptosin might make an interesting new therapeutic target for neurodegenerative disorders.
What’s next? Xu and colleagues are now probing appoptosin’s function in mouse models. They’re also looking for new therapies that target the protein.
“Since the upregulation of appoptosin is important for cell death in diseases such as Alzheimer’s, we’re now searching for small molecules that modulate appoptosin expression or activity. We’ll then determine whether these compounds may be potential drugs for Alzheimer’s or other neurodegenerative diseases,” Xu explains.
Putting a stop to runaway appoptosin won’t be easy, though. That’s because we still need the heme-building protein to operate at normal levels for our blood to carry iron. In a previous study, researchers found that a mutation in the gene that encodes appoptosin causes anemia. “Too much of anything is bad, but so is too little,” Xu says.
New therapies that target neurodegenerative disorders and traumatic brain injury are sorely needed. According to the CDC, approximately 1.7 million people sustain a traumatic brain injury each year. It’s an acute injury, but one that can also lead to long-term problems, causing epilepsy and increasing a person’s risk for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Not only has traumatic brain injury become a worrisome problem in youth and professional sports in recent years, the Department of Defense calls traumatic brain injury “one of the signature injuries of troops wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
Researchers supported by the Wellcome Trust have discovered that we use a different part of our brain to learn about social hierarchies than we do to learn ordinary information. The study provides clues as to how this information is stored in memory and also reveals that you can tell a lot about how good somebody is likely to be at judging social rank by looking at the structure of their brain.
Primates (and people) are remarkably good at ranking each other within social hierarchies, a survival technique that helps us to avoid conflict and select advantageous allies. However, we know surprisingly little about how the brain does this.
The team at the UCL Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience used brain imaging techniques to investigate this in twenty six healthy volunteers.
Participants were asked to play a simple science fiction computer game where they would be acting as future investors. In the first phase they were told they would first need to learn about which individuals have more power within a fictitious space mining company (the social hierarchy), and then which galaxies have more precious minerals (non-social information).
Whilst they were taking part in the experiments, the team used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to monitor activity in their brains. Another MRI scan was also taken to look at their brain structure.
Their findings reveal a striking dissociation between the neural circuits used to learn social and non-social hierarchies. They observed increased neural activity in both the amygdala and the hippocampus when participants were learning about the hierarchy of executives within the fictitious space mining company. In contrast, when learning about the non-social hierarchy, relating to which galaxies had more mineral, only the hippocampus was recruited.
There’s no question that our ability to remember informs our sense of self. Now research published in Clinical Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, provides new evidence that the relationship may also work the other way around: Invoking our sense of self can influence what we are able to remember.
Research has shown that self-imagination – imagining something from a personal perspective – can be an effective strategy for helping us to recognize something we’ve seen before or retrieve specific information on cue. And these beneficial effects have been demonstrated for both healthy adults and for individuals who suffer memory impairments as a result of brain injury.
These findings suggest that self-imagination is a promising strategy for memory rehabilitation. But no study has investigated the effect of self-imagination on what is perhaps the most difficult, and most relevant, type of memory: free recall.
Targeted light transmission to genetically altered brain cells stops seizures cold.
Strobe lights can trigger epileptic seizures. Now imagine a light that stops a seizure a split second after it starts.
By applying pulses of light to genetically altered nerve cells deep in rat brains, researchers at Stanford and Pierre and Marie Curie University in France have done just that. Their results, which showed for the first time how a part of the brain called the thalamus is involved with epileptic seizures, were published in Nature Neuroscience.
The study could point toward new targets for epilepsy treatment, says Ed Boyden, associate professor and leader of the Synthetic Biology Group at MIT. Boyden was not involved in the work. Some ideas “might emerge immediately from knowing new targets to insert deep brain stimulation electrodes,” a type of device already used to help people with epilepsy, Boyden says.
The latest research looked at a kind of seizure that sometimes follows damage to the cerebral cortex, the outer part of the brain, from strokes or head injuries. Previous reports had hinted that the cortex might also communicate during a seizure with the thalamus, the brain’s message relay center.
In the current study, experiments with rats confirmed that the thalamus propagates seizure activity originating in the cortex. To see if the thalamus could be a target for treating seizures, Jeanne Paz, the paper’s lead author, and her colleagues turned to optogenetics, a technology that lets researchers use light to turn brain cells on and off.
For the “genetics” part, they used a virus to insert the DNA code for a light-sensitive protein into thalamus cells of rats. When exposed to light, the protein interferes with these cells’ ability to communicate.
The researchers then developed a light source that would turn on only when a rat had a seizure. To detect seizures, they implanted electrodes into the rats’ brains. When these electrodes registered a seizure starting, light from a laser was aimed directly at the genetically altered thalamus cells. The result, the researchers found, was that flipping on the light immediately stopped the seizure activity, proving that the thalamus is needed to keep seizures going.
“We’re excited that just a brief light exposure was enough to stop the seizure,” says John Huguenard, Stanford professor of neurology and neurological sciences and an author of the study.
However, Huguenard says, an optogenetics-based brain implant to control seizures is a long way off because of the unknown risks of altering a person’s DNA with a virus. “I would want to be cautious,” he says.